Apollo 11 Moon Landing Revisited: Hoax ~vs~ Debunk

[Andy_Ross]

Very.

Which side of the moon never receives sunlight?

 

[Andy_Ross]

We were talking about mining the craters on the Moon believed to be full of ice where the sun has not shone for billions of years.

You said, and just confirmed the 'side' of the moon that doesn't receive sunlight.

That is not the same as craters.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

Yes, we get that Armstrong was legendary and an amazing test pilot. But is landing a lunar module onto the moon's surface really just like landing a plane..?

A facetious remark, but it was a type of craft which he had painstakingly trained to fly, and understood, and he had the skills and attention to detail and nerve to do the job without panicking or getting confused or flustered. In all those ways which actually matter it was indeed like the several types of aircraft he had qualified to fly.

 

[Vixen]

Do you? Do you understand how water might be used to help make it?

Electrolysis splits the water into hydrogen and oxygen.

 

[Vixen]

But this would be like the generals trying to do a Jedi mind trick on millions of scientists and engineers all over the world for half a century, telling them to ignore facts about geometry, radiation, technology etcetera that they know are true.

Why won't you acknowledge this?*



* That's a rhetorical question.

I have acknowledged that this means much to you. I understand.

Please stop using the 'millions of people' appeal.

 

[GlennB]

We were talking about mining the craters on the Moon believed to be full of ice - or rather elements that make up water - where the sun has not shone for billions of years.

Your actual words have been quoted back to you. You were talking about a
side of the moon, not craters.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

We were talking about mining the craters on the Moon believed to be full of ice

But you decided to talk instead about a "side of the moon that has never had any sunlight", instead of the lunar poles which receive oblique sunlight.

... - or rather elements that make up water

Those elements would be hydrogen and oxygen. Lunar craters are not going to be full of those gases. They are the materials you might hope to make from the water that might be found.

 

[Vixen]

Now which side of the moon would that be?

Here you go:

Deep in the craters of the Moon's south pole lurk permanently shadowed regions: areas that have not seen sunlight in over two billion years. Now, NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter is shedding a new light on some of our satellite's darkest mysteries.





For complete transcript, click here.
This video is also available on our YouTube channel.

 

[Vixen]

At that point I assumed she was talking about the miniscule (as a percentage of lunar surface area) parts in deep polar craters that never get sunlight. But her recent wording is unambiguously implying a side of the moon that never gets light.

Haha you just did a quick google to discover I was right. So now it's a game of semantics.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

Ahead again.

You can imagine you're ahead and yet be galloping off in the wrong direction. Again.

 

[Mojo]

ISS, SpaceX = space stations. So big deal.

What is SpaceX's orbital period?

 

[Andy_Ross]

Here you go:

Deep in the craters of the Moon's south pole lurk permanently shadowed regions: areas that have not seen sunlight in over two billion years. Now, NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter is shedding a new light on some of our satellite's darkest mysteries.





For complete transcript, click here.
This video is also available on our YouTube channel.

A side of the moon isn't mentioned

 

[SteveAitch]

Which side of the moon never receives sunlight?

The inside?


better late than never...

 

[Andy_Ross]

Haha you just did a quick google to discover I was right. So now it's a game of semantics.

You said a side of the moon.

 

[zooterkin]

Here you go:

Deep in the craters of the Moon's south pole lurk permanently shadowed regions: areas that have not seen sunlight in over two billion years. Now, NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter is shedding a new light on some of our satellite's darkest mysteries.





For complete transcript, click here.
This video is also available on our YouTube channel.

Thanks for once again demonstrating your method of doing a quick search and grasping the wrong end of the stick.

Where does that say that one side of the Moon receives no sunlight?

 

[Jack by the hedge]

I have acknowledged that this means much to you. I understand.

Please stop using the 'millions of people' appeal.

Millions of people with the relevant expertise and knowledge to understand why the moonhoax grifters arguments are ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ is a different argument from the one you are decrying.

 

[Andy_Ross]

Don't forget Armstrong being able to pilot the LM.
He had training on the Lunar Lander Research Vehicle.

 

[Vixen]

No.

You told us it was something we could Google. You were trying to say "people of average intelligence." But that's too colloquial for a Triple-Niner, so you had to try to dress it up with some statisticksy-sounding language to make yourself seem smarter than you actually are.

That is not correct. It was simply a factual correction. Please can you not mention it again. Thanks.

 

[zooterkin]

That is not correct. It was simply a factual correction. Please can you not mention it again. Thanks.

Six steps ahead...

 

[Jack by the hedge]

Vixen already knows Armstrong trained to fly that simulator as she previously argued that the time it crashed was a reason why it would have been considered too dangerous to try it for real.

Well I assume she knows something about the vehicle. At least that it must have existed. Some reference she found on a moonhoax site probably.