case in pointThat's a terrible thing to say about @JayUtah
Rusty Tyler said:
Why would you conclude that a supernatural event would not be shared in writing?
Because someone shared their experience with the world.
And they weren't alone.
It's an epidemic. - LOL
Who said they have to be taken seriously?As you can probably tell, I'm a little annoyed and dispirited at the state of the world. And especially I'm depressed that people who are capable of posting things like "evidentiary evidence" have to be taken seriously.
A cynic or a skeptic might wonder whether this man secretly worked in concert with the "healer".The next Sunday morning the healed man testified that he had been healed by God, and he pointed to me as the one who had prayed for him.
One of the oldest healing tricks.
So did I. Since you love stories, here's mine.It would be dishonest to claim that all healing stories are false.
I witnessed a healing myself.
Have you seen it demonstrated? It can be pretty convincing, unless you know the trick. Like the Balducci Levitation.One of the oldest healing tricks.
Cost too much to print so they could be dropped.There are few things funnier than people trying to interpret a series of manuscripts cherry-picked by various groups to try to give legitimacy to their religion.
Rusty, my apologies, I haven't been reading the thread. What's your opinion on the Apocrypha? And please specify which apocrypha and your individual take on them.
Thanks
No - the Jews and Christians share some of the pre-Jesus-times texts, the Jews knew that Jesus couldn't be the messiah and knew that he was simply a very naughty boy so didn't need to lie about that and create new "teachings".That would be your reaction.
Probably the minority position.
The Bible is a collection of religious texts that is central to Christianity o
r Judaism,and esteemed in other Abrahamic religions such as Islam. Bibles are anthologies
with varying canonical texts across traditions.
There's a good short (8 mins) video that demonstrates the trick and the con. He references DB a few times.Derren Brown demonstrated such a 'healing' on one occasion I seem to recall.
Cost too much to print so they could be dropped.
Plus a lot of the books dropped disagreed with protestantism's sola fide philosophy.Precisely. Whoever wrote the gospels, even the older sections were not eyewitnesses, never mind the copying of each others' homework, and additions that were being added into the 5th century, for example the "whoever is without sin throw the first stone.... splat....Mother how many times do I have to tell you?!" story is a 5th century addition. It's only by the 5th century that the canon was set, we could have ended up with a lot of other books that the early Christians accepted as gospel as the official gospels. And Revelation only just made it into the canon, which we should be grateful for as so many good horror books and movies have come from that book. Plus then you have the dropping of some of the books by the protestant sects - for very sound theological reasons: dropping the books made the bible cheaper to print. As with all crime syndicates - follow the money.
You have it backwards. Where's the proof that things "outside of nature" exist?Doesn't that assume that there is nothing outside of nature?
Where's the proof?
There are genealogies provided. Scoff if you care to.
And why are we begging the question?I'm torn.
Part of me is sympathetic to the evolutionary view and another part rejects it.
If Adam was not the first man, then what original sin did Jesus pay the penalty for?
And why are we paying for the sin of Eve? - LOL
Derren Brown demonstrated such a 'healing' on one occasion I seem to recall.