Mojo
Mostly harmless
It is just the position that we cannot know anything about gods.Doesn't the term "agnostic" leave a door open to possibility?
It is just the position that we cannot know anything about gods.Doesn't the term "agnostic" leave a door open to possibility?
Having read a good number of NDE testimonies, I see plenty about the afterlife.That NDEs almost certainly tell us nothing about what, if anything, happens after death.
If by "agnostic" you mean "not sure whether God exists", then that is in fact an atheist position. Either you believe God exists or you don't.Doesn't the term "agnostic" leave a door open to possibility?
Haven't you read Greek mythology? "Great Zeus!"It is just the position that we cannot know anything about gods.
Of course it does. There is a very remote possibility that some entity resembling a general concept of a god may appear someday and do something apparent to a majority population of our planet that resembles close enough the general concept of a god's singular abilities that people in general accept it as such. There is no evidence, barring anecdotes, that such a thing has ever happened in the past. And no reason to think that such an entity currently exists.Doesn't the term "agnostic" leave a door open to possibility?
I thought atheists were sure God doesn't exist.If by "agnostic" you mean "not sure whether God exists", then that is in fact an atheist position. Either you believe God exists or you don't.
Like the Second-coming of Christ?Of course it does. There is a very remote possibility that some entity resembling a general concept of a god may appear someday and do something apparent to a majority population of our planet that resembles close enough the general concept of a god's singular abilities that people in general accept it as such.
Many of us here are familiar with Greek mythology. Just as we are familiar with christian mythology. The sources for both equally lack any basis for believing them to be true or accurate.Haven't you read Greek mythology? "Great Zeus!"
"...is not there at all." Corrected.Unfortunately, faith requires believing even when the evidence is not all there.
That is one possibility, although I am not sure that the appearance of such an entity would be "second" as there is rather little actual evidence, bar mythology, for the first.Like the Second-coming of Christ?
Seems that the first coming garnered a reasonable amount of attention. ???
I find the idea incredibly problematic: why do we have to wait for someone to almost die to receive a message of critical importance? Why use such an unreliable conduit as someone who has just undergone a traumatic experience?Great question, thanks.
Usually the person who experiences an NDE comes back with a message.
Typically a life-changing experience for them. We need to listen to them. IMHO
That's a valid question about whether the Genesis account is literal of figurative.Many of us here are familiar with Greek mythology. Just as we are familiar with christian mythology. The sources for both equally lack any basis for believing them to be true or accurate.
No.Do you believe in Zeus too? If not, why not?
They seem to be tailored to the individual.If NDEs were real, wouldn't they all be the same?
Seems to be the only way to really get our attention.why do we have to wait for someone to almost die to receive a message of critical importance?
Maybe they're orchestrated by different kinds of kami?If NDEs were real, wouldn't they all be the same?
Having read a good number of NDE testimonies, I see plenty about the afterlife.
No, atheists don't believe that God exists. That includes people who "aren't sure".I thought atheists were sure God doesn't exist.
Agnostics aren't sure.
Are you aware that mythology is mythical?Haven't you read Greek mythology? "Great Zeus!"
What do you conclude from that?
A meaningless existence?