The mother strongly denies she is the author of Woody's works. She simply transcribed it for him. For example, I recently sent off a magazine article. The editor sent me back a preview copy, heavily edited to fit their publishing style. However, I am still its author and composer of the thoughts therein. Yes, YouTubers feel strongly about whatever message they are presenting. It doesn't mean they've proven anything. Yesterday, I watched half a YouTube video claiming cats and dogs came back in spirit form after death, quoting Edgar Cayce as the authority in this. I mean, when watching YouTube, suspend credulity and view it as the 'entertainment' it is, instead of seeing it as gospel truth, and what could be more entertaining than controversy on a sensitive topic?