• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Ed Israel/US Attacks Iran /Yet Another Country/Iran

I don't really understand the motivation behind liberals and progressives passionately defending a theocratic dictatorship that has stripped half of its population of any rights whatsoever, actively persecutes other religions and atheists, and executes homosexuals or anyone who speaks against the theocracy, and has repeatedly declared its intention to terrorize western nations and kill us all.

Is the hatred for Trump so extreme that you will defend a regime that is completely antithetical to everything you claim to hold dear... just to make it clear how much you dislike the current democratically elected president of the US?
 
I don't really understand the motivation behind liberals and progressives passionately defending a theocratic dictatorship that has stripped half of its population of any rights whatsoever, actively persecutes other religions and atheists, and executes homosexuals or anyone who speaks against the theocracy, and has repeatedly declared its intention to terrorize western nations and kill us all.

Is the hatred for Trump so extreme that you will defend a regime that is completely antithetical to everything you claim to hold dear... just to make it clear how much you dislike the current democratically elected president of the US?

I don't know anyone who doesn't detest the theocracy of Iran. Trump's not-a-war war will not end that. You are naive if you think it will. And in the meantime, it hurts the people of Iran, possibly as much, or more, as their own leaders have.

My enemy's enemy is not automatically my friend.
 
I don't really understand the motivation behind liberals and progressives passionately defending a theocratic dictatorship that has stripped half of its population of any rights whatsoever, actively persecutes other religions and atheists, and executes homosexuals or anyone who speaks against the theocracy, and has repeatedly declared its intention to terrorize western nations and kill us all.
Hey sure Saudi Arabia sucks and we clearly should have invaded them.
 
Including your aircraft carrier full of ◊◊◊◊ with burned out accommodation?

"We had the UK say - this is three weeks ago - we'll send our aircraft carriers, which aren't the best aircraft carriers, by the way. They're toys compared to what we have."

Downing Street says America has never requested aircraft carriers from the UK and the UK has never offered to send any.
 
Why didn't you link to the actual story?

And what does that story consist of? Anonymous sources who have "concerns" about what they think might be the case. These anonymous sources are not actually privy to what intelligence Trump is getting, they have no first-hand knowledge and don't even claim to. Other than the fact that it flatters your preconceptions, why should anyone take these rumors seriously?

These sources validate Trump's cluelessness about this war and pretty much everything that we all can observe every time he speaks.

You seem to disagree.

Please cite in detail what makes you think Trump has any idea what he's talking about.
 
I don't really understand the motivation behind liberals and progressives passionately defending a theocratic dictatorship that has stripped half of its population of any rights whatsoever, actively persecutes other religions and atheists, and executes homosexuals or anyone who speaks against the theocracy, and has repeatedly declared its intention to terrorize western nations and kill us all.

Is the hatred for Trump so extreme that you will defend a regime that is completely antithetical to everything you claim to hold dear... just to make it clear how much you dislike the current democratically elected president of the US?

No one is defending Iran, but thanks for sharing the Fox News talking points you credulously accept as reality.
 
Trump on NATO: "I was doing a test. I said, 'I'd love to have you come up. Bring your boats. You can sail through the beautiful Hormuz Straits and you can protect people that are being shot at.' They didn't do it. And that's small potatoes. Do you understand what I'm saying?"

Yes. Everyone understands what you are saying. You started a stupid fight with no exit planned and wanted to see if you could browbeat your allies into jumping into the same seething mess with you. And it turned out they weren't stupid enough to fall for that. And you're whining and using that to back off from your commitment to NATO even though this never had anything to do with NATO.

In short, your an idiot and a liability. That is what you are saying.
 
These sources validate Trump's cluelessness about this war and pretty much everything that we all can observe every time he speaks.

You seem to disagree.

Please cite in detail what makes you think Trump has any idea what he's talking about.
You are confused about where the burden of proof lies. I'm not the one making the positive claim here.
 
I don't really understand the motivation behind liberals and progressives passionately defending a theocratic dictatorship that has stripped half of its population of any rights whatsoever, actively persecutes other religions and atheists, and executes homosexuals or anyone who speaks against the theocracy, and has repeatedly declared its intention to terrorize western nations and kill us all.

Is the hatred for Trump so extreme that you will defend a regime that is completely antithetical to everything you claim to hold dear... just to make it clear how much you dislike the current democratically elected president of the US?

And it should be noted that it isn't "liberals and progressives" who are against this war, it's 61% of Americans. You don't get to that number with just "liberals and progressives".

Seriously, turn off Fox News before your brain completely liquifies and leaks out of your ears.
 
Why didn't you link to the actual story?

And what does that story consist of? Anonymous sources who have "concerns" about what they think might be the case. These anonymous sources are not actually privy to what intelligence Trump is getting, they have no first-hand knowledge and don't even claim to. Other than the fact that it flatters your preconceptions, why should anyone take these rumors seriously?
I notice you haven't disagreed with the news report, just the summary.
So here is the first part

WASHINGTON — Each day since the start of the war in Iran, U.S. military officials compile a video update for President Donald Trump that shows video of the biggest, most successful strikes on Iranian targets over the previous 48 hours, three current U.S. officials and a former U.S. official said.

What good reason is there for the Commander in Chief to get such video shorts apart from "entertainment" and feeling important?

What would you have said about if Obama did that for Afghanistan?

It shows that the commander in chief lacks the concentration to understand the situation. And this is a commander in chief who is particularly keen on claiming to take command and design decisions where other presidents would have delegated to experts.

Does that previous sentence remind anyone of any famous 20th century leader?
 
The countries most affected by the lack of oil delivery are all in Asia: China, South Korea, Japan, Philippines etc.

China could absolutely organize and safeguard a Demilitarized Strait of Hormuz - but the US would never let that happen
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom