• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Trump's Second Term

"I thought it would be worse" -- Trump's new line on his Iran "excursion" is that he actually thought it would hurt the economy more than it has

That was just your little secret, then. You expected this and more. Despite declaring that nobody, not even the experts, considering the Iranians might fight back.

Try to give your lies some semblance of coherence.
 
Conway is right

“Everything Trump touches…”
.
 
A bit more about the buffoon's idiotic Pearl Harbor joke:


President Donald Trump on Thursday invoked Japan's December 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor when speaking about recent U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran during a bilateral meeting at the White House with Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi.

Asked by a reporter why the U.S. didn't tell Japan or other allies about its decision to strike Iran before it did so, the president said: "We went in very hard and we didn’t tell anybody about it because we wanted surprise. Who knows better about surprise than Japan? OK, why didn’t you tell me about Pearl Harbor?"

"You believe in surprise, I think, much more than us," Trump added, referencing the 1941 attack on the American fleet at Pearl Harbor in Hawaii that precipitated the United States' entry into World War II.

Trump's comment drew a few laughs from around the Oval Office, which was occupied by Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and other administration officials. Members of the Japanese delegation and members of the U.S. and Japanese press corps were also in the room.
 
A bit more about the buffoon's idiotic Pearl Harbor joke:

He's such an imbecile, as are those who laughed. He isn't funny, he just isn't. I'm so over his cultist's simpering seal claps at his poor attempts at humor.
 
Tulsi Gabbard next to be thrown under the bus?


Rumors continue to swirl about Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard‘s future as critics on Wednesday slammed her testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee, especially when she declared that it is not the Intelligence Community’s “responsibility” to determine what constitutes an imminent national security threat — a claim that received tremendous blowback.

“Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime?” asked U.S. Senator Jon Ossoff (D-GA).

“The Intelligence Community assessed that Iran maintained the intention to rebuild and to continue to grow their nuclear enrichment capability,” Gabbard replied.

“Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was a, quote, imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime, yes or no?” Ossoff pressed.

“Senator, the only person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the president,” Gabbard responded.

“False,” Ossoff replied. “This is the worldwide threats hearing where you present to Congress national intelligence, timely, objective, and independent of political considerations.”

Podcaster Paul Rieckhoff, an Iraq War veteran and founder of a veterans nonprofit, slammed Gabbard’s remarks.

“I don’t think she survives this,” Rieckhoff wrote. “She’s already not trusted in Trump world as a former Democrat. And not trusted by most people period. Sooner or later, Trump is gonna dump her and blame her.”

“But like Noem, Hegseth, and so many others, she shouldn’t have been there in [the] first place,” he added. “And anyone who voted for her is responsible for this mess now. It’s all coming to the fore now. They are all being revealed. That’s what war does. Especially forever war that is now overflowing beyond US control. Our enemies are celebrating yet again. And we are all less safe. More and more by the minute.”

In other words, like so many other Schitler appointees, she doesn't know how the ◊◊◊◊ to do her job.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom