Mojo
Mostly harmless
Are you claiming that if you hadn't attacked during this crucial two-week window, Iran would have crossed some sort of rubicon that would have led to them inevitably having nuclear weapons at some indeterminate point in the future?Second, the two week timeline is for us to attack, it is not the timeline for them to get nuclear weapons. If you had read Rubio's interview in full, you would understand the logic of that claim. You can argue the claim is wrong, but you either don't understand or are misrepresenting what the claim is. Because it isn't that Iran was about to get nuclear weapons.
Or are you claiming that attacking in this two-week window will prevent Iran from ever having nuclear weapons?
Last edited:
