I agree that it was difficult to watch.Has anyone else seen the recent movie "Sovereign" starring Nick Offerman and Dennis Quaid? It's a hard watch, but well worth it.
I agree that it was difficult to watch.Has anyone else seen the recent movie "Sovereign" starring Nick Offerman and Dennis Quaid? It's a hard watch, but well worth it.
Yer man there, Mr Frown (sic), is quite the eejit...To the point of giving an average eejit an unwarrented reputation for excessive stupidity, rather than being, well, just a bit of an eejit.
Why is he allowed out in public unsupervised?
I haven't spotted any British ones trying this particular stupidity, although they are often very keen on things like the Uniform Commercial Code and Black's Law Dictionary.
I think they’ve caught onto that, thus Résumé’s observation,May I recommend that you adopt the term: 'sovcidiots' ?
If enough people start using it, the concept that they are idiots may eventually soak into the mess that should be their minds.
(wiki link added to Résumé’s post)They're calling themselves American State Nationals now.
He's okay with it.I think they’ve caught onto that, thus Résumé’s observation,
(wiki link added to Résumé’s post)
PPS: I hope he/she appreciates the autocorrect of their moniker.
He's okay with it.
Oh damn.
Have I been misreading your handle all this time?
I've always read it as resume as in: "As you were" or "You may keep going with what you were doing".
You're correct; I read that post wrong.Oh damn.
Have I been misreading your handle all this time?
I've always read it as resume as in: "As you were" or "You may keep going with what you were doing".
Sadly in Australia, many of the 'nationalists'/Australia first idiots (the 'thinking' of, not the political party, although there is a LOT of crossover in the two groups) have a similar load of .... as in the laws dont apply since the times of Federation here, so they are all 'sovereign' and can do whatever they want - strange that they are also real big on using US sovcit stuff mixed liberally in like the whole commercial law, marine laws stuff and even some claiming protection under the US constitution lol (I fairly recently saw on youtube a Aussie sovcit loudly proclaiming that the whole arrest was invalid because they hadn't 'Miranderised him' LOL)If you follow Scottish nationalist sites there are a number of 'sovereign citizens' posts. Essentially they claim that since the declaration of arbroath the people of scotland are sovereign so the the treaty of union is invalid, so scotland is independent and westminster laws cannot be applied to scots in Scotland. I am not sure that push it as far as not paying taxes or registering cars etc.
Like many people before have said: It's abject, complete and abyssal stupidity.Sadly in Australia, many of the 'nationalists'/Australia first idiots (the 'thinking' of, not the political party, although there is a LOT of crossover in the two groups) have a similar load of .... as in the laws dont apply since the times of Federation here, so they are all 'sovereign' and can do whatever they want - strange that they are also real big on using US sovcit stuff mixed liberally in like the whole commercial law, marine laws stuff and even some claiming protection under the US constitution lol (I fairly recently saw on youtube a Aussie sovcit loudly proclaiming that the whole arrest was invalid because they hadn't 'Miranderised him' LOL)
Oh the stupidity is a given of course- or they wouldn't be sovcits in the first place....Like many people before have said: It's abject, complete and abyssal stupidity.
I like The Captain (an Aussie) on Youtube but even by Aussie standards, he's pretty rude and crude lol (so would send most yanks into hysterics lol)I like watching the SC on OP:L when the cops take their vehicles.
"Optional citizens" "op. cit." for short.May I recommend that you adopt the term: 'sovcidiots' ?
If enough people start using it, the concept that they are idiots may eventually soak into the mess that should be their minds.
Wargamers who take the game too seriously??It's the modern version of people who think they are magicians: utter the correct formulae and everything will work out extra good, just for you, because you are so much more clever than the common rabble! Whether it's writing your name in all-caps on a document application or inscribing sigils in blood on a parchment scroll it's the same basic idea: there are secret loopholes in the rules if you just know them.
That they don't actually work has never been an impediment to the pursuit and practice of these things.
Miranda Rights don't exist here, but an arresting police officer does have to tell you that you are under arrest, and what you are under arrest for, or the arrest is not lawful. I know this because the case in which I was pleased to do my civic duty as a juror hinged on whether the arrest was lawful or not.(I fairly recently saw on youtube a Aussie sovcit loudly proclaiming that the whole arrest was invalid because they hadn't 'Miranderised him' LOL)
The Parliament may take over from the States their public debtsas existing at the establishment of the Commonwealth, or a proportion thereof according to the respective numbers of their people as shown by the latest statistics of the Commonwealth, and may convert, renew, or consolidate such debts, or any part thereof; and the States shall indemnify the Commonwealth in respect of the debts taken over, and thereafter the interest payable in respect of the debts shall be deducted and retained from the portions of the surplus revenue of the Commonwealth payable to the several States, or if such surplus is insufficient, or if there is no surplus, then the deficiency or the whole amount shall be paid by the several States.

Same over here in I think all of the countries. But like in the USA you can be detained without being arrested but only under certain circumstances.Miranda Rights don't exist here, but an arresting police officer does have to tell you that you are under arrest, and what you are under arrest for, or the arrest is not lawful. I know this because the case in which I was pleased to do my civic duty as a juror hinged on whether the arrest was lawful or not.