• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Does 'rape culture' accurately describe (many) societies?

Poem said:
No I didn't. You haven't been following.

Like I said, I was talking about porn and the deliberate attempt to big up pedo transgression.

Obvious misrepresentation. See above.

You should be cognisant of the fact that you have misunderstood me. I am only repeating the view of those that support the UK's coming Crime and Policing Bill which will ban online what is already illegal offline.

Is that clear?
Click to expand...

I really haven't misunderstood you at all.

Have a lovely day.
 
Poem said:
Actually addressing my post would substantiate that but you didn't. Hit and run?
Click to expand...

It's very difficult to hit a constantly moving target.

If I'm being completely honest, I really don't think you argue in good faith and that you put your conclusions before your deliberations. I'm not interested in debating with someone with that attitude. But you can denigrate me for this if it makes you feel any better.

Have a lovely day.
 
3point14 said:
It's very difficult to hit a constantly moving target.

If I'm being completely honest, I really don't think you argue in good faith and that you put your conclusions before your deliberations. I'm not interested in debating with someone with that attitude. But you can denigrate me for this if it makes you feel any better.

Have a lovely day.
Click to expand...
Pathetic. Put up or shut up.
 
3point14 said:
It's very difficult to hit a constantly moving target.

If I'm being completely honest, I really don't think you argue in good faith and that you put your conclusions before your deliberations. I'm not interested in debating with someone with that attitude. But you can denigrate me for this if it makes you feel any better.

Have a lovely day.
Click to expand...
Here is you getting it totally wrong:

theprestige said:
Probably not a popular opinion, but I think being sexually attracted to a sixteen year-old who closely approaches our ideal standard of beauty is a healthy response. Indulging in that sexual attraction to form a romantic interest is not, however, a good thing. So I see nothing particularly reprehensible about porn that celebrates the youth and beauty of people just this side of what is legal. As long as everyone really is legal, and what's on the tin is legal.
Click to expand...
To which I replied:
Poem said:
Sure, attraction to such is normal .....
Click to expand...
However, you stated:
3point14 said:
You clearly stated that you find it disgusting that persons over the age of majority who look younger than they are can be found sexually attractive ..............
Click to expand...
How about manning up and admitting your mistake?
 
Poem said:
How about manning up and admitting your mistake?
Click to expand...

As I say, I don't think you debate with honesty and I don't think I made a mistake. I think you revise your statements, without admitting that you do so, in response to points that give the lie to your position.

I really don't think you have a particularly critical attitude towards this topic and I think you're arguing way more from emotion than from logic. not that it's wrong to have an emotional reaction, but, in order to demonstrate a point, you need logic. not just raw outrage and other people's quotes.

I honestly don't think there's a single piece of evidence or an argument you could hypothesise that would cause you to change your position, so me debating with you is pointless. And, as I say, I believe you don't argue with integrity and constantly move goalposts. I'm not interested in that discussion.

Please do, however, continue to have a lovely day.
 
3point14 said:
As I say, I don't think you debate with honesty and I don't think I made a mistake. I think you revise your statements, without admitting that you do so, in response to points that give the lie to your position.

I really don't think you have a particularly critical attitude towards this topic and I think you're arguing way more from emotion than from logic. not that it's wrong to have an emotional reaction, but, in order to demonstrate a point, you need logic. not just raw outrage and other people's quotes.

I honestly don't think there's a single piece of evidence or an argument you could hypothesise that would cause you to change your position, so me debating with you is pointless. And, as I say, I believe you don't argue with integrity and constantly move goalposts. I'm not interested in that discussion.

Please do, however, continue to have a lovely day.
Click to expand...
Anything but deal with the specifics of what I wrote. Waste of time.
 
Pornocracy:
The book also warns of a dystopian future where AI-powered porn and sextech threaten to reduce us all to masturbating meat puppets on an algorithmic production line.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom