And in the UK it is not behind honour system age verification, it is behind strong age verification systems. If it isn't the websites and owners can face fines and criminal action. Fines can be £18 million or 10% of their annual turnover, whoever is higher, executives can face up to 2 years in jail, UK ISPs can be ordered to restrict access thus losing access to the UK market. I don't think it goes far enough, for example any payment providers should be targeted even if it is ones the UK state may not want to ban throughout the UK because of the disruption it would cause e.g. the credit card companies.
FTFY. Also, porn is content created to inspire lust.
No it isn't. Lust is sexual desire for another person. What porn inspires is sexual arousal.
Well said. I'll adjust accordingly.
I have presented lots of evidence. For me, the overriding factor is that it is harming children. We also know that the porn business model (i.e. easy access) will never preclude such exposure. Which ever way you slice it, access to porn is, for most, more important than childhood wellbeing. In many ways, porn is worshipped as a God.
No, you haven't. You've presented like minded people's opinions. This hardly constitutes evidence.
Evidence from those considered to be experts in the field - and a lot of it relating to children.
Nonsense, these individuals are hardly experts. They are religious zealots.
It's not an assumption at all. But a starting point. It must be proven that it is for me to consider any actions are needed.
No details and not proven.
No details and not proven.
Porn is axiomatically good for people? Certainly, under nihilism, ethical matters can be decided on a whim. In terms of right and wrong, there is no recourse if a nihilist decides that underage porn is ethically sound.
No, you have to prove they are experts..
First of all, I didn't say that. I said that harm to individuals must be proven BEFORE we decide it to be harmful. I take a neutral stance until then. I contend nothing close to solid evidence demonstrates it to be harmful to the viewer. You have a much more demonstrable argument that alcohol is.
www.bbc.co.uk
Of course. People with no last name always sound cool. If you look, every person on their team has no last name, and is therefore cool.
