That's his claim, certainly.
Where is the proof it is an accurate claim?
Mr Anders Björkman graduated from Chalmers University of Technology in 1969 with a. M.Sc. in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering.
"some outstanding questions about the estonia".
Bahnhof
http://privat.bahnhof.se › factgroup › est › bilaga2
Mr Anders Björkman graduated from Chalmers University of Technology in 1969 with a. M.Sc. in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering. He spent a year in ...
And that proves what?He worked as a loss adjuster in marine insurance.
A document where he gives himself the title of 'marine architect' is worthless.
That that document is not evidence that he was a marine architect, as I said.And that proves what?
Sure. Some random guy faked his qualifications just to fool a a few people on a website forum!That that document is not evidence that he was a marine architect, as I said.
I could produce a document giving myself the title of 'Brain surgeon', which would be equally worthless.
That's half true. His desired audience wasn't just a web forum but the world at large. And yes, he pretended to be something he isn't in order to get undeserved attention.Sure. Some random guy faked his qualifications just to fool a a few people on a website forum!
Do you understand that when you present at a conference, they simply recite whatever qualifications you claim?Anders Björkman graduated from Chalmers University of Technology in 1969 with a. M.Sc. in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering.
"some outstanding questions about the estonia".
Nahhhh, surely people wouldn't do THAT.....That's half true. His desired audience wasn't just a web forum but the world at large. And yes, he pretended to be something he isn't in order to get undeserved attention.
Any evidence?That's half true. His desired audience wasn't just a web forum but the world at large. And yes, he pretended to be something he isn't in order to get undeserved attention.
Is it a naval college?Chalmers is rated 165 in the world and no. 1 in Sweden, according to this webpage.
![]()
Chalmers University of Technology
Learn more about studying at Chalmers University of Technology including how it performs in QS rankings, the cost of tuition and further course information.www.topuniversities.com
For which part? The evidence that he sought wider attention than just a web forum is ample in the form of his numerous appearances and publication. The evidence that he was pretending to be something he isn't is his quite evident incompetence.Any evidence?
It DOES have a department of Mechanics and Maritime Services.Is it a naval college?
Vixen seemed to insist that he specifically went to a naval college.It DOES have a department of Mechanics and Maritime Services.
Firstly, I have had my email allocated a ticket number.You're merely repeating his claim, or sources that repeat his claim without evidence. The second document you've presented is a reproduction of a "paper" Bjorkman wrote.
Since you've not actually provided any evidence, I figured I'd do your job for you.
I am emailing Chalmers University of Technology.
The email will state the following:
Hello there, apologies if this is the incorrect email address to use for this kind of enquiry, however I thought I should reach out to you.
I am involved in a discussion regarding Anders Bjorkman, a man who claims to have been a naval engineer. He also claims that he received an M.Sc. in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering from your university in 1969. I was hoping that you would be able to confirm whether or not this is the case?
Again, apologies if this is not the correct place to be making this enquiry, and if that is the case, could you please provide the proper channel for my request?
Yours Faithfully, [my name]
[td][td]Ditt ärende nedan har registrerats med ärendenummer T-2511-5473 .[/td] [td][/td]Hej Edward Baylis,
We have registered your case below with ticket T-2511-5473.[/td]
It DOES have a department of Mechanics and Maritime Services.
They do not teach naval architecture.Vixen seemed to insist that he specifically went to a naval college.
First, as has been explained to you ad nauseam, he has demonstrated that he is "doolally" in physics, including nuclear physics. One simply cannot be a competent naval architect without a strong understanding of physics. Why is this so hard for you to accept?History is littered with people who are expert in one area but totally doolally in others. Scientists such as Bacon believed in alchemy and astrology, for example. To my mind it is the search of knowledge that drives them and the former is how Chemistry came to be born.
Count me in that "we" as well.I'm happy for him to speak for me.
So that's a 'we'
Did they in 1969?They do not teach naval architecture.