Er, Andi Meister was the Estonian government minister for transport when he was appointed head of the Estonian element of the JAIC. He resigned in protest of what he believed was information being withheld from the Estonian side by the Swedes.
Note the word 'assumption' instead of 'confirmed'. Of course the Jaic knew Tammes drowned because his body was recovered. The others are presumed to have drowned.
It would have proven as bunkum that the two naval divers who claimed they witnessed Captn Andresson had a bullet wound or bullet wounds to the head were mistaken. We are none the wiser as to whether Andresson was actually in control of the ship during the course of events, given the unidentified bod under the flagbox.
Insurance doesn't replace damaged reputations, nor does it settle questions raised about competence. No amount of coverage can change the fact that a ship with their name on it is now covered by the Baltic Sea. I'll let the engineers in the discussion explain more about why that's important, should they so choose.
Absolutely. Its good that you confirm that your previous statement was incorrect about that JAIC did not mention the bridge crew.
When that person is the point of the inquiry. Not so here.
You've never worked in that industry. Your uninformed opinion is irrelevant.
"Because I say so."
Asked and answered.
Conspiratorial twaddle.
Asked and answered. He is a poor source for the reasons already given.
At best an unsubstantiated rumor. In any case, irrelevant to the investigation.
According to "Analysgruppen" report, part 1 pages 89 and 90, the Swedish Maritime Administration did a public tender for the dive. 15 companies were invited to submit a proposal. 11 of them did. The contract was awarded to Rockwater A/S from Stavanger Norway.
How can it ascertain how the ship sank if they haven't even verified the captain was at the steering wheel, as it were, when events unfolded? Responsibility has to be apportioned. Well of course they will have gone to some lengths for the answers, except it would appear to be 'classified' to us. The question is, why?
Er, owned by Halliburton in the USA and one of the most expensive of the tenders.
Remind us again how many forensic engineering investigations you have personally participated in? Use primes notation if necessary.
Show us the source of the evaluation of the different proposals, where they were rated from fulfilling the requirements, experience and cost.
It's in the JAIC report that you claim that you have read and know. Actually in exactly the chapter that I linked to, the one that you did claim does not exist.
Tesla in Sweden is still owned by Tesla US, is it not; Elon Musk at the helm..?
Saying 'it is an assumption' is akin to guesswork, when surely it MUST know. Well, of course, you might think it matters not a jot what the captain was doing or where he was, as one can blame the two strong waves.
If the ship is sinking why wouldn't the captain leave at some point if he could?
Tesla Sweden AB is a Swedish company, that is owned by a US Company. That does not make the Staff at Tesla Sweden AB stop being Swedish.
