According to the propaganda outlet
Arutz Sheva, sure. We've already established Arutz Sheva's foundation in religious Zionism. And yet they're your go-to source for information.
I make it a habit of perusing the Israeli press, all of it. Some in Hebrew, some in Russian, some in English, and some in Arabic (translated by AI).
Of course, Russian is also one of the primary languages spoken/read in Israel, considering the rather large 15% percentage of the population that prefers their native tongue.
Here is the entire article INN offered regarding the placement of physical boundary markers:
As part of the ceasefire agreement and in accordance with the directive of the political echelon, IDF troops under the Southern Command have begun marking the Yellow Line in the Gaza Strip, which marks the area over which IDF forces hold control, to establish tactical clarity on the ground.
The marking consists of a concrete barrier with a pole painted yellow, standing 3.5 meters high.
The concrete barriers are being placed approximately every 200 meters, with adjustments made based on terrain conditions between each marker. The marking process will continue in the coming period.
What, pray tell, is your complaint about that dispatch being propaganda?
I hope you don't mind if I dismiss your obvious religious propaganda with disdain.
I do mind, because you are dismissing their factual reporting as invalid merely because your position is that "Religious Zionism" is somehow inherently evil (or deserving of disdain, just because..)
Did you know that Arutz Sheva broadcasts in three languages? The first two are obviously Hebrew and English, but do you know what the third is? Russian. Isn't that interesting?
Not sure why it's "interesting" with 15% of the population of the country being native Russian-speakers.
(Over a million came pouring into the country during the 1990's, as the Soviet Union collapsed and Jews were allowed to leave)
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
planigale notes that the INN article offered the information about HAMAS links to alJazeera "without criticism or clear attribution" -- that not accurate, because in the second paragraph of the story, the original source is mentioned.
In today's bizarre 'media' environment, it behooves all of us to dig a bit deeper on what's presented, by every outlet.
That is going to become even a bigger problem of reliability, trustworthiness, accuracy and 'spin' as more and more news organizations simply regurgitate AI-generated material without attribution.
Also, I found her linking to massacres by Israel upon Arabs to be disingenious.
Nearly all the references were from the previous century. And occurred during wartime, not out of the clear blue sky.
