Interesting question. My understanding is that CAIS still leads to a male-typical skeletal structure, including a male-typical pelvis. The distribution of fat across the body tends to be a bit more female-typical though. I'm not sure how that's going to influence center of mass.
Rather than just name-calling, how about you tell me exactly what in my posts represents hate in your mind?
Why don't you have this same level of care and empathy toward females when it comes to single-sex spaces? Females who are naked in the shower are vulnerable, and feel a lot of fear and dehumanization when there's a strange male who can see them without consent. But you support males having the special privilege of overriding female boundaries in showers and changing rooms.
I have always made this clear right, from the outset. Its not my fault if you can't keep up or have been too lazy to read back.
That often happens when people get pissy and butthurt because their claims and opinions are challenged using facts and evidence. They can't stand the heat of having their claims put under close scrutiny, which usually results in the inconsistency and stupidity of those claims being exposed.
BOOM
A nothinburger issue that consumes the hateful karens of this world. How dare those people try to live their lives in a way that offends me! Something must be done! Next up, homosexuals and atheists.
...says the man who never had to face, and never will have to face, the "nothingburger issue" of dealing with a menstrual flood in a public toilet, who is never likely to have to deal with the "nothingburger issue" of being raped and needing the male-free services of a rape crisis centre, who will never have to deal with the "nothingburger issue" of being beaten to a pulp by a male partner and needing the male-free environment of a domestic abuse shelter.
I'd like you to take a step back just a moment and really think about your position.
It's certainly the view of misogynists.
Karen is a dreadfully hateful word, and it is specifically towards women. A woman who feels strongly about something, or has the gall to complain about something, is a Karen. It's a term that means a woman should just STFU.
Yeah, I guess that's true, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't try to work on that. Just for your own sake.
So as to avoid this little digression and allow you to focus on my question.
You seem to have missed the part where I mentioned "how those terms should be interpreted when they appear in the EqA" and even put part of that in italics for emphasis, hoping no one would miss it.
Nope. This is a mixed sex facility which is permissible, although they might get challenged on indirect discrimination.
Why not? It is obvious from their statements and their behavior that they mean a pond for transwomen and ciswomen rather than a pond for females only.
The SC judgement did not purport to tell service providers how to use gendered language, so far as I can tell, unless they are found in violation of some provisions of the EA.
Says who and where did they say it?
Because the EA must interpret "women" as "female", when discrimination is alleged. That's the SC ruling.
Not if you are the Scottish Ministers, who already stipulated that they wrote their 2018 law atop the meanings of the EA 2010.
I don't think they said anything about facilities anywhere in the decision.