• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The sinking of MS Estonia: Case Reopened Part VII

Then allow me to spell it out, in words of as few syllables as practicable.

It is difficult to grasp, because it is utter nonsense written by someone who knows nothing about commercial diving or marine operations.

The ignorance persists despite several posters taking the time to explain various aspects of these disciplines (the distinguishing features of a dive ship, the numbers of persons involved, permits and consents, etc etc). Secret dive indeed :ROFLMAO:.
So, Question 1: How did you find out about the Bemis, Evertsson and Kurm dives?
Question 2: How do you know these were the ONLY dives not authorised by Sweden or appropriate Treaty authority?
 
Last edited:
Was it your source for the claim that he dealt in spacecraft?
I am unable to tell you of the first moment I learned of this claim but I can assure you, it is common knowledge that this is a belief of some, which can be found in any reference book re MV Estonia, as facts have a habit of existing in their own right and cannot be owned by any one individual.
 
I am unable to tell you of the first moment I learned of this claim but I can assure you, it is common knowledge that this is a belief of some, which can be found in any reference book re MV Estonia ...
Citation, please.
 
Last edited:
How would I know? I am citing notable persons in current affairs of what they have said re Vononin.
As far as I can tell, you haven't cited anyone regarding the claim that the case contained software, merely asserted it yourself:

Software technology , silly. As can be carried in an attaché case.


Who are these notable people?



I never make anything up. All of my comments are sourced, unless I state 'IMV'.


Estonia Ferry Disaster com
 

Back
Top Bottom