What was proven? Marasca-Bruno Supreme Court was not a merits court and therefore does not do any establishing of facts or weighing up of evidence. Its pontification - pure pie in the sky pfaffing - that Sollecito's DNA was there by a 'flawed' investigation was never a finding of fact by any court with the legal remit to find such a fact.
Neither court is equipped to weigh up evidence. All the ECHR does is based on what is put in front of it. Notice Dalla Vedova didn't dare put the proper case files in front of it re the Calunnia conviction, he slyly used a different court - Boninsegna - who was simply a third party commentator to the the Massei/Nencini court. He can speculate the police showed undue familiarity and what have you but that was just his personal opinion; no more relevant than yours or mine. Out of an entire shopping list of every breach under the ECHR statute book, the greedy pair (Knox and her counsel) only succeeded on one and a procedural point on another. Instead of the €2,000,000.00 compo demanded by the convict she was awarded just €18K, not even enough to reimburse Della Vedova's air fares.
What was proven? All eight points I cited.. you know, the ones you're too dishonest to address.
Better tell Masi-Martuscelli of the Florence Supreme Court that they have got it all wrong when it says Knox was at the cottage when Kercher was killed. Likewise Marasca-Bruno spells out Knox washed Kercher's blood from her hands and did name Lumumba to cover up for Guede. Plus the burglary was staged. This is set in stone and in the legal annals in perpetuity. ETA: Oh, you spotted a typo. That is the only joy you are likely to get here.
Hellmann? Get away with you.
Funny, I say the same about Massei and Nencini yet you keep going back to those overturned opinions. Your dishonesty and disingenuousness is legendary!
Pop quiz... WHAT was the evidence used by the court to know Amanda was at the cottage when Meredith was killed.
Hellmann and Conti & Vecchiotti were largely struck out by Chieffi, remember? (Except for the Calunnia conviction, confirmed!) Expunged, binned, shredded.
Mixed DNA: in Filomena's room and in the bathroom. Knox freshly having bled the same time as Kercher. (No, it wasn't from her pierced ear.)
Your post demonstrates your high level of ignorance or biased interpretation of legal matters. As you have been told in previous responding posts, the Chieffi CSC panel, under Italian law, did quash the Hellmann Court of Appeal verdict. The Chieffi CSC panel could not, and did not, eliminate the valid (admissible) evidence in the case. Thus, the report of the court-appointed experts, Conti and Vecchiotti, remained in evidence, as did the elements of Stefanoni's lab reports, lab documents, testimony including but not limited to those police who collected the knife from Sollecito's kitchen, and the video recordings of scientific police activities including but not limited to the collection of the bra clasp. Also not eliminated from the record is the fact that Stefanoni did not document, and thus did not provably conduct, certain forensic activities required for reliable LCN - LT DNA profiling. Nor did she provide the defense with the full complement of results for the negative and positive controls that she ran, nor did she provide the defense with copies of the DNR raw data electronic files.
Yes they can, they just cannot defend them on the basis that they're innocent.
It was rather difficult to claim he wasn't there since he knew from monitoring the news while he was on the run in Germany that they had his handprint and shoeprints in blood.
No, it wasn't. It was based on Stefanoni's later discredited "Kercher's DNA on the blade" and "RS's DNA on the hook".
Yes, Hellmann, just like Massei and Nencini, were "struck out", remember? Apparently not, as you consistently cite from Massei and Nencini as if they were still relevant. C&V were not, could not be "struck out", or in any other way, be discredited. Remember? Again, apparently not.
