Yup, without American weapons IDFascists would not have been able to destroy Gaza.
The USA did no fighting for Israeli in 1973. We did not "fight a war for them".
Sorry, but "A Clean Break" was a real Zionist strategy document for re-shaping the Middle East, and called for regime change in Iraq, Syria, Iran. Many of the people pushing Bush to invade Iraq participated in this document, and many more supported it. A leading publication of Neo-Conservatives is a Jewish magazine called "Commentary".
Absolutely not. They are basically a dependent of the USA.
apnews.com
by your logic, Iran should quit the NPT and Israel would no longer have a reason to attack its program.
www.theguardian.com
I'm not a big fan of the idea. On balance I'd probably condemn. I think diplomats are fair game, but it's a game that gets very awkward for you very fast, once you start playing.Question: If Israel decide to whack Iran's foreign minister during talks with the European counterparts, will you:
a) support
b) condemn
c) wait to see what Israel does and then say that that's what they should have done.
Europe and Iran will try diplomacy as US weighs joining fight with Israel
Iran’s foreign minister will meet in Geneva on Friday with counterparts from Germany, France and the United Kingdom.
Please post your votes to this thread with emojis.
I made a statement of fact, one which you were evidently ignorant of. The issue of what different actors should do is separate, and your assumptions about my position on that are just as wrong.
Not to me. What point do you see?
What was the point of assassinating the hostage negotiator?
I don't know. I'm literally asking you to tell me what the point was.
That's understandable. I still don't see how Iranian diplomats meeting with their French, German, and UKian counterparts matters in this regard.
Aw, the poor babies.
Nobody wants to make deals they think won't be good for them. Everyone wants to make deals they think will be good for them. If someone is unwilling to negotiate, that just means they don't think they can get a deal that's good for them, it doesn't actually mean that they wouldn't take a good deal. They may or may not be right about that, but if you think they're wrong, if you think a good deal is possible, then that's the sticking point, not the decision to not negotiate based on not thinking you can get a good deal.
The Bushehr design is similar to Western reactor designs, and very different from the RBMK design at Chernobyl. The design differences are important, because it's precisely the inherently dangerous RBMK design that allowed Chernobyl to happen. A loss of power at Beshehr might lead to a meltdown and radioactive leak along the lines of what happened in Fukushima, but it would not produce a Chernobyl-style explosive excursion.
