Ed Applying luma curve to photos and footage

[nt1]

And how about Andy's six photos then?

Whatever six they are. Im very sure we will see them soon. Thanks for the reply.

 

[nt1]

Go back and address JayUtah's two posts explaining mathematically and showing by example why your technique merely creates bright lines along edges in pictures which have been oversampled to upscale them from low resolution to a higher resolution.

You are wasting your time otherwise. We know why your technique draws bright borders around objects, and that it is not evidence the pictures have been faked.

Hi jack. No sir. I will continue with my subject.

The fact you said mathmatically about photo forensics is my reasoning to move on. Thank you for the input. Ill address it as i see fit. The same way my input is addressed as you see fit.

 

[nt1]

Try it out. Give it a shot

 

[nt1]

Give it a second thought. Try it yourself. But a little time in. Youll be interested in the results.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

Using the luma curve exposes altered and composite footage that is not genuine in images.

Simple as that.

False. Simple as that. You have not addresssed the explanation of why you are wrong. Until you do, you're completely wasting your time.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

Whatever six they are. Im very sure we will see them soon. Thanks for the reply.

If you don't know what Andy's six photos are then you have probably put so many people on ignore that you cannot follow what's being said in this thread and you are wasting everyone's time.

 

[nt1]

I suggest you get a free app and a free gpt. Speak to it. Try multiple images from multiple sources.

The generation and source does not change the results enough to warrant total dismissal.

In fact. Sometimes it makes almost no difference.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

The fact you said mathmatically about photo forensics is my reasoning to move on.

And that is all we need to know to realise you are not even going to try to understand why you're entirely wasting your time.

 

[arthwollipot]

Whatever six they are. Im very sure we will see them soon. Thanks for the reply.

Several people have given you links to the six photos. Your protests that you have no idea which six photos we are talking about just exposes your dishonesty.

Sorry. As a solution holder I said I would not take part in this thread.

 

[nt1]

Try it. Dont just stare and comment and take other users words for it. Try it. Do your own reaearch and make a solid opinion. Based on your time and your mind and your reaearch.

Read up on what it does and doesnt show.

Read up on what false results look like.

It will be interesting. I promise

 

[Pixel42]

Whatever six they are. Im very sure we will see them soon. Thanks for the reply.

We've already seen them. You have been given links to where they were originally posted (though how you could possibly have missed them is a mystery) at least three times. You agreed to do this simple test. If you don't, you will have no credibility. Simple as that.

 

[nt1]

Oh good. Because that is now.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

Claim: history should contain unaltered footage.

9/11 was not investigated by agencies looking at stuff on YouTube. Sorry if this comes as a surprise.

Tell us how low resolution analog video can be transferred to YouTube while remaining "unaltered". It's literally that transfer process which creates the pictures your technique draws borders on.

 

[nt1]

 

[nt1]

View attachment 61575

Try it. For yourself. Then come back. And lets discuss.

 

[nt1]

9/11 was not investigated by agencies looking at stuff on YouTube. Sorry if this comes as a surprise.

Tell us how low resolution analog video can be transferred to YouTube while remaining "unaltered". It's literally that transfer process which creates the pictures your technique draws borders on.

Maybe they should go back and do that.

Dont forget.

I can get some .gov pictures too.

Lets do that next.

Get pictures posted on .gov websites. That should clear up the youtube comment.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

You keep altering photos to make them look unnatural and then ask an AI to agree with you the photos now look unnatural.

Which part of that are we supposed to be impressed by?

 

[nt1]

9/11 was not investigated by agencies looking at stuff on YouTube. Sorry if this comes as a surprise.

Tell us how low resolution analog video can be transferred to YouTube while remaining "unaltered". It's literally that transfer process which creates the pictures your technique draws borders on.

Maybe they should go back and do that.

Dont forget.

I can get some .gov pictures too.

Lets do that next.

Get pictures posted on .gov websites. That should

 

[nt1]

 

[Andy_Ross]

Whatever six they are. Im very sure we will see them soon. Thanks for the reply.

Here they are

Ed Post in thread 'Applying luma curve to photos and footage'

Jun 1, 2025

Here are 6 pictures

Which ones have been tampered with.

• Andy_Ross

•