Andy_Ross
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2010
- Messages
- 83,781
-
Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more
Ed Applying luma curve to photos and footage
- Thread starter nt1
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 9/11 9/11 evidence
Pixel42
Schrödinger's cat
Are you planning to demonstrate which is which after nt1 has done his thing, Andy, or simply tell him? I'm wondering if it might be worth PMing the correct answers to a couple of other posters in advance for independant confirmation if it's the latter.
JimOfAllTrades
Master Poster
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 2,145
Excellent idea. Always good to keep everything documented so the results can't be called into question.
On another note, some nice shots there. Well done!
Jack by the hedge
Safely Ignored
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2009
- Messages
- 27,100
I bet it's a truck question and there are alien spaceships in all 6. But in 3 the cloaking device was on and in the other 3 the flying saucers were photoshopped out.
So it's actually a test to see if nt1 can detect alien cloaking tech.
So it's actually a test to see if nt1 can detect alien cloaking tech.
nt1 has no way to be sure those members are trustworthy. He could instead be sent an encrypted copy of the answers, with the key sent after he's made the analysis.
Thermal
August Member
But he should trust AR to put the correct answers in the encryption?
There's no way that a charge of shenanigans can't be laid, no matter the outcome. We're all interested in this stuff, so surely honor system should suffice?
Thermal
August Member
If I'm reading the odds right, OP has a 5% chance of guessing all three right randomly (50% of guessing one of the first six, 40% one of the next 2 out of 5, and 25% of the last one out of four). If he can identify the tampered element in each (boat added in pic 3, dead farmer removed in pic 6, etc), then he is far beyond the range of lucky guess.
I think shenanigans by Andy Ross is not anything to worry about, because he is not trying to win at all costs; we would all be intrigued by nt1s method.
Eta: and this test will be exponentially more difficult, as it is dealing with digitally originated images, digitally altered with modern high pixels to clean up the "masking". Not like the fuzzy edged 2001 pics from video tape
I think shenanigans by Andy Ross is not anything to worry about, because he is not trying to win at all costs; we would all be intrigued by nt1s method.
Eta: and this test will be exponentially more difficult, as it is dealing with digitally originated images, digitally altered with modern high pixels to clean up the "masking". Not like the fuzzy edged 2001 pics from video tape
Last edited:
Thermal
August Member
arthwollipot
Limerick Purist Pronouns: He/Him
I volunteer.
arthwollipot
Limerick Purist Pronouns: He/Him
I have the data. I've screenshotted it (for the timestamp). I will not further participate in any part of this conversation until the reveal.
Last edited:
Thermal
August Member
I got the 36 DMs with a different set of results in each...
I mean, I got one too.
I mean, I got one too.
Thermal
August Member
I predict a nice, suddenly quiet thread where posters can relax and enjoy a little peace and tranquility.
Thermal
August Member
I'm just going to work on my tan for a while, propped against this massive pile of unanswered questions and challenges, while we move into Day Three of the Missing nt1 Watch. If one of you guys could photoshop a milk carton with a "Have you seen me?" pic of our missing protagonist, it might help. Don't forget the alpha halo. A beta halo will do if you're all out.
Cosmic Yak
Philosopher
He seems to have moved on to chemtrails, in another thread.
JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
Color me surprised. With halo.
Thermal
August Member
C'mon, nt1, ya boring. Look, I'll give you the first one: pic number 1 has a tree's reflection added where there is no tree on the shore.
{Eta: or the reflection was slid over or the tree causing reflection was slid or however you want to say "reflection not jibing"}
Now get ya ass in gear for the rest. Me and the rest of the thread already got them all.
{Eta: or the reflection was slid over or the tree causing reflection was slid or however you want to say "reflection not jibing"}
Now get ya ass in gear for the rest. Me and the rest of the thread already got them all.
Last edited:
Generic reason. Everything about the event needs to be openly reinvestigated by the federal government. It is believed by many that it never was investigated properly. Those many have different beliefs and different views.
9/11 is the only foreign attack on a U.S. state. A state. All other attacks do not meet that criteria. Im saying it deserved a better investigation and still does.
Flight 11. 63 cancel. 17 no shows.
That is enough for me. This is a public forum. I respect your skepticism. Not your tone. I use comments like yours to help me look at things. I am not here to fufill any of tour personal requirements or interests.
I do appreciate your time. Thank you
You want truth. You want accuracy. You want reality.
Then use the word conspiracy properly.
9/11 was a conspiracy by definition. The only conviction in the US for 9/11 WAS CONSPIRACY.
so. There. Thats my connection. 9/11 was a conspiracy. The. Cancelations happened on flights used in that conspiracy. Boom.
as far as your actual question? No. I do not currently have that. We will have to see if there is any connection that leads to further reading.
The names and interviews of one flight are in an fbi file. Only 2 lists exist. The other two were never supplied to an investigation
Thank you
These are the extra words of no use.