• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Split Thread Diversity Equity and Inclusion and merit in employment etc

And what about federal agencies no longer honoring or celebrating Black History month, Holocaust Remembrance Day, St Patricks Day, Columbus Day? Why spit on our beautiful diversity?
Those poor Irish-Americans, sadly unable to properly celebrate their heritage without a federal holiday and decorations in every federal office. /s

Anyway, you asked about ethnic affinity clubs at West Point. I take it you found my answer satisfactory.
 
Last edited:
How about assuming someone is acting in bad faith without even knowing what their have to say?
If someone has a history of acting in bad faith, I'm not going to care what they have to say on any given topic.
 
Those poor Irish-Americans, sadly unable to properly celebrate their heritage without a federal holiday and decorations in every federal office. /s

Anyway, you asked about ethnic affinity clubs at West Point. I take it you found my answer satisfactory.
Trump has threatened to pull Federal funding from ANY college that has ethnic affinity clubs.
 
Those poor Irish-Americans, unable to properly celebrate their heritage, without taxpayer dollars in their pockets. /s
So you think its ok to crack down on people celebrating their heritage. Because you think somehow acknowledging and celebrating one's heritage is a bad thing, and we should punish students for doing this.
 
So you think its ok to crack down on people celebrating their heritage. Because you think somehow acknowledging and celebrating one's heritage is a bad thing, and we should punish students for doing this.
Nobody is cracking down on this. Nobody is punishing students for this. Students are not entitled to have the federal government fund their ethnic celebrations.
 
Nobody is cracking down on this. Nobody is punishing students for this. Students are not entitled to have the federal government fund their ethnic celebrations.
You're confusing the issue with an unrealistic framing. If, hypothetically, a school gets funding from the state for student clubs, and one of those clubs is the African American Student Alliance, it would be a textbook case of viewpoint discrimination to say that "ethnic affinity" clubs aren't entitled to funding.

You're not going to find the federal government "funding ethnic celebrations" directly, and probably not even indirectly. They'll instead fund something else entirely, and then threaten to revoke that funding because the school, or some student group, expresses a viewpoint they don't like.
 
You're confusing the issue with an unrealistic framing. If, hypothetically, a school gets funding from the state for student clubs, and one of those clubs is the African American Student Alliance, it would be a textbook case of viewpoint discrimination to say that "ethnic affinity" clubs aren't entitled to funding.

You're not going to find the federal government "funding ethnic celebrations" directly, and probably not even indirectly. They'll instead fund something else entirely, and then threaten to revoke that funding because the school, or some student group, expresses a viewpoint they don't like.
You don't like the framing talk to @Hercules56
 
No. I've been responding to his framing all along.
Here's what you were responding to:

"Trump has threatened to pull Federal funding from ANY college that has ethnic affinity clubs."

That's not a claim that the administration is going to pull federal funding for such clubs. You're just badly misinterpreting the claim.
 
And this


So i ask again, what is so wrong with celebrating and recognizing our nation's cultural and ethnic diversity???
I question your dual premise that these are the only ways to recognize "cultural and ethnic diversity" and that this is the only thing such programs did. Also, the headline is clickbait. The programs in question were paused for review, they may or may not get shut down. If they were engaged in racial discrimination (as many such programs are), then that's not just celebrating diversity. That's engaging in racial discrimination, and it is right and proper that such clubs be shut down. If they are not, then a review will show that they are not and I have no problem with them starting up again.
 
If someone has a history of acting in bad faith, I'm not going to care what they have to say on any given topic.
LMFTFY: If you don't like what someone has to say, you (like Arth) can conveniently claim that they are a bad faith actor to justify not having tio consider their arguments.
 
Here's what you were responding to:

"Trump has threatened to pull Federal funding from ANY college that has ethnic affinity clubs."

That's not a claim that the administration is going to pull federal funding for such clubs. You're just badly misinterpreting the claim.
Edit: found the source of that quote in this thread.

What I haven't seen is a source for the claim.
 
Last edited:
LMFTFY: If you don't like what someone has to say, you (like Arth) can conveniently claim that they are a bad faith actor to justify not having tio consider their arguments.
You haven't fixed anything. You're just falsely imputing motivations.

Ziggurat said:
I've searched the last few pages of this thread, and cannot find the sentence you put in quotes anywhere except this post. Where are you getting this from?
Post #1,928, on this page.
 
So here's an actual source for the actual Trump administration position:

At its core, this policy is actually very, very simple:
"If an educational institution treats a person of one race differently than it treats another person because of that person’s race, the educational institution violates the law."

If anyone here object to anything in that policy, I suggest they refer to the actual policy, and not some third party's characterization of that policy.
 
This is more or less irrelevant, and has no legal force. What's relevant is the effect of the executive orders they have issued.
Executive orders have no legal force on anyone who isn't part of the executive branch. But if you're concerned about an executive order rather than the relevant agency position, then you should cite the relevant text of the executive order you think matters. In no case are third party characterizations of agency positions or executive orders more determinative than the actual positions or orders themselves.
 
Executive orders have no legal force on anyone who isn't part of the executive branch.
That isn't particularly true, due to delegated power. It's also kind of irrelevant. Like I said--what's relevant is the effect of the executive orders. You might want to consider who sued to enjoin these orders, and why they had standing.

In no case are third party characterizations of agency positions or executive orders more determinative than the actual positions or orders themselves.
Who said it was "more determinative"? It was broadly accurate, and was then mischaracterized.
 

Back
Top Bottom