dirtywick
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2006
- Messages
- 10,266
i want to talk a little bit about his strategic reserve announcement, the obvious insider trading that happened a result, and why this is worse than bog standard government and private business corruption.
first of all, the announcement itself neglected to include btc and eth, the two biggest and most popular block chains. that's kind of funny, even though he came back later and was like "well obviously btc and eth, that goes without saying" but i think it's more likely that they were so focused on the ◊◊◊◊ coin block chains they'll be using to siphon the money with.
trump's very russian thing of having a czar for everything's crypto czar david sacks goes on to dubiously say he doesn't hold any crypto has heavy ties to solana, the crypto used in various rug pull bitcoin schemes, including javier milei, melania, and trump's own rug pull trump coin and the ftx fraud that saw billions of retail investors money wiped out. i’ve outlined others in his admin with direct ties to crypto coins and tech above, and there will be more names by the end. and forget all the ties to musk for now
so, what do they do with it? insider trade off the info? obviously but that’s nothing new or notable. money is going to be spent, insiders buy up and profit, a government contract is fulfilled. there’s money skimmed yeah.
but what makes this worse is with crypto, nothing is happening. the money is added to the pot and the earlier in you are the more you reap. then eventually money is withdrawn. the bitcoin isn’t producing value, which at least with a $40k government stapler you are getting a stapler.
and the real question is under what circumstance would the government selling crypto makes strategic sense? how is it not just the government buys, crypto goes up, the early adopters sell and make a killing? are they proposing that they buy early, the government buys, the government sells, and they hold the bag because they’re nice and want to help with the debt.
this is a ponzi
first of all, the announcement itself neglected to include btc and eth, the two biggest and most popular block chains. that's kind of funny, even though he came back later and was like "well obviously btc and eth, that goes without saying" but i think it's more likely that they were so focused on the ◊◊◊◊ coin block chains they'll be using to siphon the money with.
trump's very russian thing of having a czar for everything's crypto czar david sacks goes on to dubiously say he doesn't hold any crypto has heavy ties to solana, the crypto used in various rug pull bitcoin schemes, including javier milei, melania, and trump's own rug pull trump coin and the ftx fraud that saw billions of retail investors money wiped out. i’ve outlined others in his admin with direct ties to crypto coins and tech above, and there will be more names by the end. and forget all the ties to musk for now
so, what do they do with it? insider trade off the info? obviously but that’s nothing new or notable. money is going to be spent, insiders buy up and profit, a government contract is fulfilled. there’s money skimmed yeah.
but what makes this worse is with crypto, nothing is happening. the money is added to the pot and the earlier in you are the more you reap. then eventually money is withdrawn. the bitcoin isn’t producing value, which at least with a $40k government stapler you are getting a stapler.
and the real question is under what circumstance would the government selling crypto makes strategic sense? how is it not just the government buys, crypto goes up, the early adopters sell and make a killing? are they proposing that they buy early, the government buys, the government sells, and they hold the bag because they’re nice and want to help with the debt.
this is a ponzi