• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: JFK Conspiracy Theories VIII

This is the cable from the CIA's Mexico City station about what they had on Oswald, and what they did, and who they forwarded the information to:


This report continues with an overview of everything that happened after the assassination. There's no tap dancing here. The CIA went hard into their investigation (s), and were looking at everything quietly hoping to link Oswald to either Cuba and or the Soviets,
 
PookieBear said:
Unlikely by an average schmuck, yes.

I used to know a guy who was an NYPD policeman. He once had to protect the President and be his bodyguard for the day.

They took a bazillion steps to hide his own assignment from him, until literally the last minute. Even he didn't know who he was protecting....until Obama came out to introduce himself.
Click to expand...

PookieBear: You said in the Epstein thread that you don't trust the NYPD. Why are you quoting this claimed acquaintance from the NYPD as a reliable source here? Do you trust what he told you?
 
Assassinating a President is rather pointless, as they are so easily and quickly replaced. If you do it for revenge, you might as well wait until they are out of Office for your convenience.

Killing top level Judges, or key Party members or the biggest political Donors - that would have a far greater impact.
 
People who think that all it takes to prove culpability for a crime is to assign a motive, with no faffing about to get into the messy mechanics of how they did it necessary, might want to consider that Oswald had a motive too. He was an insignificant, mediocre little man with an ego that made him see himself as a world-class intellect unfairly disregarded by society, who found himself in a position where he could really make a mark on it by being in the right place and time with a gun. That's motive, means, and opportunity. That the size of the man (or his motive) didn't match the size of the crime is neither here nor there- to disbelieve it on that account alone is just to believe that ◊◊◊◊ never really just happens, that every large effect must be a consequence of some equivalent cause.
 
Last edited:
turingtest said:
People who think that all it takes to prove culpability for a crime is to assign a motive, with no faffing about to get into the messy mechanics of how they did it necessary, might want to consider that Oswald had a motive too. He was an insignificant, mediocre little man with an ego that made him see himself as a world-class intellect unfairly disregarded by society, who found himself in a position where he could really make a mark on it by being in the right place and time with a gun. That's motive, means, and opportunity. That the size of the man (or his motive) didn't match the size of the crime is neither here nor there- to disbelieve it on that account alone is just to believe that ◊◊◊◊ never really just happens, that every large effect must be a consequence of some equivalent cause.
Click to expand...
All true. Plus he desired fame. He thought defecting to Russia would get him on the front page of the world's newspapers, and make him a celebrity in the Soviet Union with all the bells and whistles. Instead, they put him to work in a Minsk television factory, so he decided to come back to the US with his hot Russian wife. The first thing he asked his mother upon getting off the plane at Love Field in Dallas was, "Where are the reporters?", and was crushed to learn nobody cared about a defector undefecting back to the US.

He wanted fame so badly he jumped at the chance for an interview on live radio in New Orleans after his arrest after an altercation handing out fliers:


This got him a brief interview on local TV News:


But he gained nothing from these activities, which he found out the hard way when he applied for a travel visa into Cuba, and learned the Soviets were not going to assist his efforts in any way (he pulled a gun on Soviet Embassy staff, which ended any hopes. The same gun he'd use to shoot Tippet).

In fact Oswald has a similar profile shared by many mass shooters: smart guy who realized he was going nowhere in life.
 
PookieBear said:
Unlikely by an average schmuck, yes.

I used to know a guy who was an NYPD policeman. He once had to protect the President and be his bodyguard for the day.

They took a bazillion steps to hide his own assignment from him, until literally the last minute. Even he didn't know who he was protecting....until Obama came out to introduce himself.
Click to expand...

"I heard it from a friend who, heard it from a friend who, heard it from another..."

So many of your posts are some form of anecdotal composition, that I am starting to wonder if your penchant for conspiracies has not made you a target for tall (or at least exaggerated) tales. Also, FYI, common sense is not some nebulous ability uniformly inherent in humans. Rather, it is the wisdom acquired through life experience, usually outside of a formal education setting. This is why the "common" sense of a person raised in a city is notably different than that of a person raised rurally.
 
PookieBear said:
Unlikely by an average schmuck, yes.
Click to expand...
Actually, I disagree. Any assassination of the president is going to have to be by an average schmuck, working alone.

As soon as you start adding more people into the mix, it's going to be found out. Anyone high profile is going to be watched.
 
pgwenthold said:
Actually, I disagree. Any assassination of the president is going to have to be by an average schmuck, working alone.

As soon as you start adding more people into the mix, it's going to be found out. Anyone high profile is going to be watched.
Click to expand...

Well, it doesn't have to be a lone nutter, but it's much more likely. A state could, of course, plot the assassination of the leader of another country, and quite possibly successfully carry it out. The problem is that this could be uncovered, and that would effectively constitute an act of war. The adverse consequences would far outweigh the possible benefits.
 
Axxman300 said:
Oh great, here we go. The UFO lady is now the JFK-Epstein lady. At some point we might give Rep. Anna Paulina Luna her own dedicated thread because there's no CT she doesn't buy into:

floridapolitics.com

Anna Paulina Luna to lead task force on government secrets, from JFK shooting to Jeffrey Epstein’s network

The effort will also look into UFOs, 9/11 and more.
floridapolitics.com floridapolitics.com

Luna...tic...
Click to expand...

Here's her press conference.



At about 8:20 she says she wants to call members of the Warren Commission as witnesses. :faint:
 
The first thread I ever read on this site was JFK part 1V, 'The One with the Whales'. Nothing that CTs offer ever seems to progress. I'd have thought that 'doing your own "research"' might, just might encompass reading stuff contra to the cult.
 
Axxman300 said:
Oh great, here we go. The UFO lady is now the JFK-Epstein lady. At some point we might give Rep. Anna Paulina Luna her own dedicated thread because there's no CT she doesn't buy into:

floridapolitics.com

Anna Paulina Luna to lead task force on government secrets, from JFK shooting to Jeffrey Epstein’s network

The effort will also look into UFOs, 9/11 and more.
floridapolitics.com floridapolitics.com

Luna...tic...
Click to expand...
The new forum is a bit tricky to understand. Anyway that might be a good start, there are some that just cannot accept that everything may not be a conspiracy.
 
Allen773 said:
Clint Hill has passed away at 93.

www.cbsnews.com

Clint Hill, Secret Service agent who jumped onto JFK's car after the president was shot, dies at 93

"I'll live with that to my grave," a weeping Clint Hill told Mike Wallace on "60 Minutes" in 1975.
www.cbsnews.com www.cbsnews.com

He never had time for JFK assassination conspiracy theories.

RIP.
Click to expand...
I bought an autographed copy of Five Days in November a while back. He only heard two shots. Doesn't mean there were only two shots, and he was moving after the one he heard.
 
SpitfireIX said:
Here's her press conference.



At about 8:20 she says she wants to call members of the Warren Commission as witnesses. :faint:
Click to expand...
I'd say she's gonna need help from Sylvia Browne, but she's dead, too.

Everyone who served on the committee is dead. Four of the assistant council are still alive, aged 96, 94, 93 and 92. And two of the staff are still alive, aged 85 and 88. If she wants to interview any of the surviving people even associated with the Warren Commission, she'd better hurry.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom