Prediction thread: What will the U.S. gov't do that most resembles the Third Reich?

[d4m10n]

Then you obviously don't know "The Code".

Did you want us to move to the conspiracy theory forum?

There are around 65 million Latinos in the U.S. which is nearly one-fifth of the population.

"Round up all the brown people" is insane and impossible, even considering just that one subset who fit the bill.

 

[Norman Alexander]

Did you want us to move to the conspiracy theory forum?

There are around 65 million Latinos in the U.S. which is nearly one-fifth of the population.

"Round up all the brown people" is insane and impossible, even considering just that one subset who fit the bill.

More than 20 million is the number originally proposed for removal by Trump.

Assessing Trump’s aggressive deportation goals (part 1): how many migrants and which ones? - Elcano Royal Institute

Trump's ‘Operation Aurora’ aims to implement his campaign-promised immigration policies, including mass deportation of imnmigrants.

www.realinstitutoelcano.org

 

[d4m10n]

More than 20 million is the number originally proposed for removal by Trump.

Did he mention "brown people" or are you reading that part in?

Have we been given subtle assurances that illegal immigrants from Europe will get a pass?

 

[Donal]

As long as they marry him. But they may choose to go back home

 

[dann]

Are you actually predicting an (attempted) annexation of Canada in the next four years?

You didn't say that it had to be in the next four years. You just said that you'll check the thread again in four years.
As mentioned above, it took Hitler almost 20 years to annex Austria, and I seriously doubt that Trump will live as long as Carter.

Prediction thread: What will the U.S. gov't do that most resembles the Third Reich?​

I've seen several posters freely comparing the current American regime to the one which rose to power in 1930s Germany.
I'm curious to know how deep this comparison runs, in the minds of those that make it. Do they expect the establishment of work camps for the masses of untermenschen? An armed invasion of Greenland for the sake of lebensraum in the east? New laws banning interracial marriage and stripping selected ethnic groups of citizenship? Mass deportation schemes akin to the Madagascar Plan?
I'll check back on this thread in four years to see whose predictions were closest to the truth and offer them a free lunch at CSICon.

Besides, he has already started his attempt to annex Canada. His idea just isn't very popular.
At least, Hitler had a lot of support in Austria for his Heim-ins-Reich policy.

Anschluß (Wikipedia)
Nazi Germany's agents cultivated pro-unification tendencies in Austria, and sought to undermine the Austrian government, which was controlled by the Austrofascist Fatherland Front, which opposed unification. During an attempted coup in 1934, Austrian chancellor Engelbert Dollfuss was assassinated by Austrian Nazis. The defeat of the coup prompted many leading Austrian Nazis to go into exile in Germany, where they continued their efforts to unify the two countries.

That goes for his attempt to annex Greenland, too. Why do you think he sent Junior on a mission to the island? To get a tan? However, the annexation of Greenland won't be for Aryan Lebensraum. It will be for the minerals, for show (Look how yuuuge I made us!) and maybe for deportations*.
One of the things he hasn't attempted yet is to pay some Dutchman to set fire to Lord Snowdon.
As for your offer, I doubt that there will be a CSICon in four years.

* Not an entirely new idea, but I don't know if this is where he got it - if that's his intention:
DF vil sende flygtninge til Grønland (Altinget.dk, Sep 16, 2015)
Igen, igen: DF vil sende flygtninge til Grønland (KNR.gl, Aug 30, 2023)
Grønlands første flygtning (Weekendavisen.dk, June 27, 2019)

 

[dann]

I mean, he says a lot of ◊◊◊◊ things. Remember when Mexico paid for our new wall?
The whole point of a prediction game is to test what you believe will actually happen, in real life.

And he's still pissed off about it.
A lot of stuff that Hitler attempted wasn't a roaring success:

Nazi Germany (Wikipedia)
The Third Reich, which the Nazis referred to as the Thousand-Year Reich, ended in May 1945, after only 12 years, when the Allies defeated Germany and entered the capital, Berlin, ending World War II in Europe.

That is a success rate of only 1.2%.

 

[d4m10n]

That is a success rate of only 1.2%.

Which is still well above the percentage of new fence paid for by Mexico. This thread isn't for discussing failed policy initiatives, though, it's for predicting "what the U.S. gov't will do" that reasonably resembles something else that was done in another place and time.

 

[dann]

And that's why you mentioned that Trump didn't make Mexico pay for the wall, right?!
Since you introduced attempts, I pointed out that, much like Hitler, Trump may attempt to do stuff that he doesn't succeed in doing, i.e. that he didn't manage to make Mexico pay for the wall (and never got anywhere close to finishing it) doesn't mean that it was never his intention.
You are the one who suddenly introduced Trump's failed policy initiative to argue that sometimes he just "says a lot of ◊◊◊◊ things."
So it seems that whatever occurs to you - besides "predicting "what the U.S. gov't will do"" - is OK for you to introduce, but the rest of us are not allowed to object to your arguments.

I mean, he says a lot of ◊◊◊◊ things. Remember when Mexico paid for our new wall?
The whole point of a prediction game is to test what you believe will actually happen, in real life.

It may seem obvious to you, but it isn't always easy to distinguish between the different kinds of Trump insanity, i.e. between the declaration of actual intentions, misdirection, testing the waters and catchphrases. Drain the swamp, Crooked Hillary, deep state and lock her up were examples of the latter, and probably all ideas he got from Cambridge Analytica before he tried them out.
I doubt that he himself is able to distinguish between them.

 

[d4m10n]

It may seem obvious to you, but it isn't always easy to distinguish between the different kinds of Trump insanity, i.e. between the declaration of actual intentions, misdirection, testing the waters and catchphrases. Drain the swamp, Crooked Hillary, deep state and lock her up were examples of the latter, and probably all ideas he got from Cambridge Analytica before he tried them out. I doubt that he himself is able to distinguish between them.

This thread is about what they will actually get the U.S. government to do, not what they say they will do. For example, in the first Trump term they passed huge corporate tax cuts, eliminated environmental regulations, and changed the composition of the federal courts in favor of Federalist Society ideologues. These are policy changes that actually happened and in most cases haven't yet been undone.

So it seems that whatever occurs to you - besides "predicting "what the U.S. gov't will do"" - is OK for you to introduce, but the rest of us are not allowed to object to your arguments.

Object all you like but please make an actual prediction or two at some point.

 

[theprestige]

I'd kinda like to see a prediction that doesn't equally resemble a communist regime.

 

[Norman Alexander]

Did he mention "brown people" or are you reading that part in?

You are being deliberately obtuse, now. I've already explained this. Project 2025 = KKK with a suit. Take it from there.

Have we been given subtle assurances that illegal immigrants from Europe will get a pass?

Are there any of those? Remember: By Project 2025 definition, white = not illegal.

 

[arthwollipot]

I'd kinda like to see a prediction that doesn't equally resemble a communist regime.

Technologarchy is pretty much the opposite of communism.

 

[d4m10n]

You are being deliberately obtuse, now. I've already explained this.

No, you've merely asserted it.

Are there any of those?

Around ¾ million from Europe and Canada as of 2022.

Remember: By Project 2025 definition, white = not illegal.

I cannot remember something that you never actually demonstrated to be true.

I've linked to the full PDF upthread but you've yet to connect any of your assertions to the source text.

 

[Beerina]

What will the U.S. gov't do that most resembles the Third Reich?

Resembles, how about flat on clones it? As in Hitler demanded the Sudetenland to "protect ethnic Germans", and the world capitulated.

Here, the world was doing the right thing and fighting the good fight. So enter the moden Chamberlain, but with a Hitler-loving twist. We don't have to give in because of being in a currently militarily weak state.

We give in because we want Hitler to win.

 

[Norman Alexander]

No, you've merely asserted it.

Facts are tricky for you?

Around ¾ million from Europe and Canada as of 2022.

Being European and Canadian doesn't automatically make them white. You have confused nationality with skin colour.

I cannot remember something that you never actually demonstrated to be true.

Apart from what is reported daily in the media, I guess not.

I've linked to the full PDF upthread but you've yet to connect any of your assertions to the source text.

You don't seem, or don't want, to understand that there is a ton of eubtext in that document. Just like in SCOTUS rulings on the constitution. For a start, the authors are unreconstructed KKK, masters of lying. You simply CANNOT take them at their absolute word in that document. What they mean by what they have written is nothing like what you think they mean.

 

[d4m10n]

Being European and Canadian doesn't automatically make them white.

You asked about undocumented people from Europe in particular; I gave you the best data available. That aside, we can safely conclude that a significant proportion of immigrants from very light-skinned parts of the world are themselves light-skinned, if we care about skin color.

(I don't, but you keep bringing it up.)

You don't seem, or don't want, to understand that there is a ton of [subtext] in that document.

Since you claim to know the subtext, would you care to paste some of it in here?

 

[d4m10n]

I'm trying to think of a clarifying analogy here, Norman.

Imagine someone told you that the Old Testament is really about the aliens who built a network of stargate portals, and that they know this from the subtext of the Torah, as understood from the original Masoretic texts. How would you get them to show you what they consider proof? Would you find it persuasive if they assured you they can see it themselves?

 

[Norman Alexander]

You asked about undocumented people from Europe in particular; I gave you the best data available. That aside, we can safely conclude that a significant proportion of immigrants from very light-skinned parts of the world are themselves light-skinned, if we care about skin color.

White Europeans are exempt from ICE roundups...currently. You do know there are Europeans of indian, African and Middle Eastern descent, yes? Some are even Muslims. Skin colour is the selection criteria.

Since you claim to know the subtext, would you care to paste some of it in here?

You HAVE heard of the KKK, yes? Do you need a history lesson?

 

[Norman Alexander]

I'm trying to think of a clarifying analogy here, Norman.

Imagine someone told you that the Old Testament is really about the aliens who built a network of stargate portals, and that they know this from the subtext of the Torah, as understood from the original Masoretic texts. How would you get them to show you what they consider proof? Would you find it persuasive if they assured you they can see it themselves?

"Clarifying"??!! SRSLY?

 

[Darat]

Do a military deal with Russia?