• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The sinking of MS Estonia: Case Reopened Part VII

Vixen said:
@BlueMoutain: re your comments elsewhere:

  1. It was confirmed by a naval official at the official investigation that the EPIRBS were automatic EPIRBS.
  2. It was confirmed by a Norwegian professor of Metallurgy that the type of deformation seen in the bow were compatible with an explosives reaction and she did say this type of deformation in reinforced steel is only reproducible in a laboratory and at temperatures >800°C. If you want to mock an expert, that reflects on you, not me.
  3. Underwater images did indeed show submersible track marks on the Baltic Sea bed.
Click to expand...
Same old lies?

I thought this had been sunk and left to rot.
 
Vixen said:
@BlueMoutain: re your comments elsewhere:

  1. It was confirmed by a naval official at the official investigation that the EPIRBS were automatic EPIRBS.
  2. It was confirmed by a Norwegian professor of Metallurgy that the type of deformation seen in the bow were compatible with an explosives reaction and she did say this type of deformation in reinforced steel is only reproducible in a laboratory and at temperatures >800°C. If you want to mock an expert, that reflects on you, not me.
  3. Underwater images did indeed show submersible track marks on the Baltic Sea bed.
Click to expand...
Has the long awaited "official report" been released that confirms any of your fantasies? Remember, the one you were so patiently waiting to read? If not your repetitive and worthless opinions are repetitive and worthless and should not be cluttering up this fine forum.
 
Steve said:
Has the long awaited "official report" been released
Click to expand...
Expected end of 2025:
The passenger ship M/V ESTONIA sank in 1994. A Joint Accident Investigation Commission (JAIC) investigated the accident and published their final report in 1997. When new information emerged in 2020 the Estonian Safety Investigation Bureau initiated a preliminary assessment of the new information. The Safety Investigation Authority, Finland, and the Swedish Accident Investigation Authority assist the Estonian authority. A final report is expected to be published at the end of 2025. The work on the preliminary assessment is led by Estonia.
Click to expand...

The Swedish site seem to link to additional information from the ROV/Sonar investigations.
 
Steve said:
Has the long awaited "official report" been released that confirms any of your fantasies? Remember, the one you were so patiently waiting to read? If not your repetitive and worthless opinions are repetitive and worthless and should not be cluttering up this fine forum.
Click to expand...

It is certainly most unfortunate you are forced to read a topic you are not interested in, presumably because your finger keeps clicking on it?

I wonder if there is a solution.
 
Vixen said:
@BlueMoutain: re your comments elsewhere:
  1. It was confirmed by a naval official at the official investigation that the EPIRBS were automatic EPIRBS.
Click to expand...
Asked and answered many times. False.

Vixen said:
  1. It was confirmed by a Norwegian professor of Metallurgy that the type of deformation seen in the bow were compatible with an explosives reaction and she did say this type of deformation in reinforced steel is only reproducible in a laboratory and at temperatures >800°C. If you want to mock an expert, that reflects on you, not me.
Click to expand...
Asked and answered. You are not competent to evaluate those findings. I am. They're wrong.

Vixen said:
  1. Underwater images did indeed show submersible track marks on the Baltic Sea bed.
Click to expand...
Asked and answered. You don't know what "submarine" means here.

Armchair detective are worse than useless.
 
Vixen said:
Your justification for comparing me to David Irving.
Click to expand...
What, exactly, do you think my point was in the comparison?

Afterall, if you're asking me to provide a citation that you're a holocaust denier I'd point out that I never accused you of being one.

So what comparison do you think I'm making so I can either provide the citation or point out why you're...misunderstanding my point let's say.
 
MarkCorrigan said:
What, exactly, do you think my point was in the comparison?

Afterall, if you're asking me to provide a citation that you're a holocaust denier I'd point out that I never accused you of being one.

So what comparison do you think I'm making so I can either provide the citation or point out why you're...misunderstanding my point let's say.
Click to expand...


It seems unfathomable to you (no pun intended) that anyone could be genuinely interested in this topic. This was a NEWS item about a REAL investigation. So please stop making out there is no cause for anyone to be interested in it except for nutters.
 
Vixen said:
It seems unfathomable to you (no pun intended) that anyone could be genuinely interested in this topic. This was a NEWS item about a REAL investigation. So please stop making out there is no cause for anyone to be interested in it except for nutters.
Click to expand...
Not something I claimed.

Again, I'm not saying that you need to be nutter butters to be interested in the sinking of the Estonia.

If you believe I am saying that quote me saying it.

Also, that doesn't answer my question. You're making up my side of the argument again. Naughty naughty. So come on, what do you think my comparison meant?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom