HSienzant
Philosopher
American Thinker
May 22, 2024
A Forensic Analysis Of The X-Rays of JFK’s Skull Yields Surprising Results
By Jerome R. Corsi
We now know with forensic certainty that two frontal headshots and one shot from the rear at a low angle (not from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository) killed JFK. The evidence for these conclusions comes from a new book, The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy: The Final Analysis, that I have recently published with Dr. David W. Mantik, who has a Ph.D. in physics and a medical practice extending over five decades as a radiation oncologist and who has seen the JFK autopsy skull X-rays more than anyone else.
https://www.americanthinker.com/art...of_jfk_s_skull_yields_surprising_results.html
Mantik is arguing out of both sides of his mouth. On the one hand, he claims the X-rays are fakes:
https://themantikview.org/
Based on three powerful clues from the extant autopsy X-rays at NARA, this data shows that the three skull X-rays are copies and that each one has been critically altered. One change was done quite specifically to incriminate Oswald. For further discussion, see his e-book, JFK's Head Wounds.
On the other hand, he argues the X-rays are legitimate and reveal a tangential entry wound in JFK's right temple:
https://www.americanthinker.com/art...of_jfk_s_skull_yields_surprising_results.html
Using a densitometer, Dr. Mantik measured the light coming through the X-rays millimeter-by-millimeter (with some measurements at a tenth-of-a-millimeter calibration). After analyzing the JFK right lateral autopsy [x-ray], Dr. Mantik provided forensic proof that the third and final shot hit JFK in the right temple by the ear.
If the X-rays are faked, then you can draw no legitimate conclusions from them. If the X-rays are legitimate, you can reach conclusions, but your conclusions may not be correct.
In addition, your argument (or Mantik's and Corsi's that you cite here) is that Cyril Wecht and the other qualified forensic pathologists (with over 100,000 autopsies conducted in total between all the members of the panel) who reviewed the extant autopsy materials for the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) didn't understand what they were looking at? And that the three original autopsists who had the body in front of them couldn't determine an entry wound from an exit wound? And Mantik determined this from fake X-rays?
It appears from here he will say anything as long as it sells.
For starters, you could explain how the X-rays he examined can be both legitimate and fake. Then, explain how his conclusions about what constitutes an entry wound from an exit from faked X-rays can be meaningful.
Last edited: