• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Tim Walz campaign, and the ******** attacks upon him.

Walz's retired rank is so hot of an issue that it's all over the media. Veterans and active duty military members around the world are rioting because of it, it is a huge concern for us all.....

I wonder if the trolls actually believe that the above will happen if they keep beating the dead horse enough.
 
dirtywick said:
the trump campaign beating up women doing their jobs by trying to stop them from filming in veteran cemetaries reminded me, did we ever settle in on whether or not walz got his rank right? seems more important than ever
Click to expand...

What Trump's aide did by pushing the ANC employee aside is bad enough without exaggerating the incident. "Women" were not "beat up".

At the very least, that aide should be permanently barred from entering the ANC and, at most, charged with assault without injury.
 
thaiboxerken said:
Walz's retired rank is so hot of an issue that it's all over the media. Veterans and active duty military members around the world are rioting because of it, it is a huge concern for us all.....

I wonder if the trolls actually believe that the above will happen if they keep beating the dead horse enough.
Click to expand...

Don't forget the ASPCA demonstrating at Walz's campaign stops for daring to play with a dog not his own at a dog park.
 
Stacyhs said:
What Trump's aide did by pushing the ANC employee aside is bad enough without exaggerating the incident. "Women" were not "beat up".

At the very least, that aide should be permanently barred from entering the ANC and, at most, charged with assault without injury.
Click to expand...

that’s not how i see it.
 
Stacyhs said:
Were "women beat up"? No. Saying so is, therefore, more than an exaggeration: it's just plain false whether it's how you see it or not. Like I said, the truth is bad enough.
Click to expand...

thanks for your input again but i don't see it that way. i'm not interested in figuring out the details of how much how violence a woman has to suffer before she has been beat up or simply shoved around or whatever you think i should be saying. i've got it under control.

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-medal-of-honor-2669100315/

in other news, trump is back to saying the medal of honor is worse than the medal of freedom. but, he calls it the congressional medal of honor. wondering which army regulation he violated by saying that wrong, and also has walz ever said the same thing and also got it wrong?
 
dirtywick said:
that’s not how i see it.
Click to expand...

??? OK. How do you see it?

What I think is funny about this incident is how Trump staged this to point out the deaths in the drawdown of Afghanistan. And like the rest of Trump's attacks it not only missed the mark. A desperate attack at best since Joe Biden was President, not Harris.

But instead of focusing news cycles of Harris attempting to defend this tragedy, it has been news cycle after news cycle of him defending more bad behavior by him and his campaign.
 
dirtywick said:
thanks for your input again but i don't see it that way. i'm not interested in figuring out the details of how much how violence a woman has to suffer before she has been beat up or simply shoved around or whatever you think i should be saying. i've got it under control.
Click to expand...

OK. Apparently, you're also "not interested" in facts and prefer hyperbole that distorts those facts.


in other news, trump is back to saying the medal of honor is worse than the medal of freedom. but, he calls it the congressional medal of honor.
Click to expand...

Trump's pathological need to lie, misrepresent facts, be hyperbolic, and never, ever admit being wrong is well-known.

wondering which army regulation he violated by saying that wrong, and also has walz ever said the same thing and also got it wrong?
Click to expand...

I have no idea what your point is here.:confused:
 
Last edited:
Stacyhs said:
OK. Apparently, you're also "not interested" in facts and prefer hyperbole that distorts those facts.
Click to expand...

if i wasn’t clear by now what i am not interested in is your input on my word choice.

Trump's pathological need to lie, misrepresent facts, be hyperbolic, and never, ever admit being wrong is well-known.



I have no idea what your point is here.:confused:
Click to expand...

i’m making fun of anyone silent on this that was trying to discredit walz by nitpicking army regulations
 
dirtywick said:
thanks for your input again but i don't see it that way. i'm not interested in figuring out the details of how much how violence a woman has to suffer before she has been beat up or simply shoved around or whatever you think i should be saying. i've got it under control.
Click to expand...

dirtywick said:
if i wasn’t clear by now what i am not interested in is your input on my word choice.
Click to expand...

And I really don't care if you're interested in my input or not. But facts are facts: ONE woman, not two or more, was "pushed aside". She wasn't hurt and didn't even fall to the ground so she was in no way "beat up".

There's just no need to employ disingenuous tactics like that when the actual facts are bad enough because it diminishes the truth.

i’m making fun of anyone silent on this that was trying to discredit walz by nitpicking army regulations
Click to expand...

OK.
 
Stacyhs said:
And I really don't care if you're interested in my input or not. But facts are facts: ONE woman, not two or more, was "pushed aside". She wasn't hurt and didn't even fall to the ground so she was in no way "beat up".

There's just no need to employ disingenuous tactics like that when the actual facts are bad enough because it diminishes the truth.
Click to expand...

well i don’t agree with that at all so it seems we are at an impasse
 
Stacyhs said:
What Trump's aide did by pushing the ANC employee aside is bad enough without exaggerating the incident. "Women" were not "beat up".

At the very least, that aide should be permanently barred from entering the ANC and, at most, charged with assault without injury.
Click to expand...

And the Trump campaign should be sued by her for libel for calling her mentally ill, despicable and saying she had a mental episode.
 
i have the discretion to choose how to express myself and i don’t care about nitpicking my phrasing when it’s ancillary to the point i was making. i also don’t think it diminishes the truth. so i get what you’re saying but i don’t agree and that’s kind of all there is to it.
 
CarbShark said:
And the Trump campaign should be sued by her for libel for calling her mentally ill, despicable and saying she had a mental episode.
Click to expand...

That was Trump's spokesperson, Steven Cheung, who claimed the employee was to blame and co-campaign manager Chris LaCivita who called her "despicable".

As usual, every accusation by them is a confession.
 
Rule no.1: Trump is never to blame for anything, ever.
Rule no.2: Trump deserves credit for everything, all the time.
Rule no.3: everyone who disagrees is deranged/a Dem operative/Deep State/Fake News/a Demon
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom