Donald Trump

Wait, what??

ANOTHER seagull-OP Trump thread?

Do we have the bandwidth?

They have the bandwidth, but this thread should be merged into one of the other Trump threads (probably the Trump Presidency one) just for the sake of keeping a clean uncluttered board, something I like.
 
They have the bandwidth, but this thread should be merged into one of the other Trump threads (probably the Trump Presidency one) just for the sake of keeping a clean uncluttered board, something I like.

No, I don't like someone coming in, creating a new thread for something that's been discussed in excruciating detail already, and having the thread/title merged with a longstanding previous one. Where does it stop? Let the thread die and fall off the front page.
 
Last edited:
It's normal to be prideful of an accomplishment. This letter to the Editor was well written for a rant against Trump. I would like to question the OP about how exactly Trump raised current consumer pricing (this should be good). The implication I'm getting from the letter is Trump called his corporate buddies during Biden's term and told them to raise prices? Is that an accurate assessment?
 
I, too, enjoy querying seagulls who join a forum, make one post, and log out never to be heard from again.
 

Donald Trump did not fail at his job. That job was NOT being President of the USA. That job was being Putin's puppet. As a puppet, Trump did a very satisfactory job of inciting chaos in the USA, putting down the USA's Intel community in front of Putin, allowing a disease called COVID-19 to run-a-muck, and setting up a disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Trump was so good at his job that Putin is setting him up as a puppet for a second term in the US Presidency, and should Putin succeed, there will be no election in 2028, and I question if there will be a USA.
 
Donald Trump did not fail at his job. That job was NOT being President of the USA. That job was being Putin's puppet.

I don't disagree, but I think there is also a domestic role. Trump upstages literally everything and so distracts media attention away from what smarter sinister people are doing. I'm sure the architects of Project 2025 were very much counting on Trump to keep the spotlight on him and off them.
 
A letter to the editor is not an article.

Spamming for attention isn't, either.

Does this guy think this is some Pulitzer Prize level **** and his career will take off if he plasters this all over the internet enough? A lot of little teenage blue-eyed groupies, free drugs, that kind of thing? I mean, it's OK, but no one is founding a religion over it.

*deep into week two, SeagullWatch '24 continues*
 
Does this guy think this is some Pulitzer Prize level **** and his career will take off if he plasters this all over the internet enough? [/I]

Probably not.

I'd say it's a naive attempt to put more sand in Trump's Vaseline, so good on him for that, but it's kinda late to point out that Trump is a ****.
 
Perhaps this belongs in R&P, or Psychology if we had such a subforum, but I am fascinated with the mentality of joining a forum, making a one-post spam thread, and immediately logging out, never to return.
 
Perhaps this belongs in R&P, or Psychology if we had such a subforum, but I am fascinated with the mentality of joining a forum, making a one-post spam thread, and immediately logging out, never to return.

It's very similar to when scammers text "hello" then when you reply that you don't know them they start asking questions. It's basically just a way to call attention to their site in hopes of running up the numbers of their own pet project.
 

Back
Top Bottom