Cont: Luton Airport Car Park Fire part II

Status
Not open for further replies.
Vixen said:
Er no! The Gov.uk page written by er, the same Sunak government, which put an embargo on revealing the make and model of the vehicle involved? That one? The one that doesn't want anything to go wrong with FIL's Tata friendship and likely multi-billion pound financial investment in lithium-ion batteries factory...?


I will await the Fire Brigade official report, thank you.
Click to expand...


LOL this is an entirely laughable position. A position that, coming from the great mind of this particular CT-cultist, was entirely predictable. In fact, I nearly penned a satirical CT-esque "rebuttal" of the statement - along almost these exact lines - when I first read ohms' reporting of it earlier today.
 
Vixen said:
Er no! The Gov.uk page written by er, the same Sunak government, which put an embargo on revealing the make and model of the vehicle involved? That one? The one that doesn't want anything to go wrong with FIL's Tata friendship and likely multi-billion pound financial investment in lithium-ion batteries factory...?


I will await the Fire Brigade official report, thank you.
Click to expand...

Don't forget to include the United States in that conspiracy. The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration published that study that said that Li-ion EVs fires aren't any more intense than gas or diesel vehicle fires. And you know that's just wrong, what with your hours of study of the Daily Mail comments threads and consultations with car salesmen and people who worked at parking garages.
 
Steve said:
"Every person bar one is in on the coverup. Official statements are always made to hide the truth. The real 'facts' are the ones that I believe. Only when my 'facts' are confirmed will the investigation be complete." / Resident CTist.

Makes a person wonder how some people function IRL.
Click to expand...

There's probably an element of "Look what I found! Tell me I'm smart and stick it to the refrigerator with a banana magnet!".

Some people never grasp the concept of "look what I realized was scrap and threw away" as a declaration of intelligence.

But yeah, it's a lot like blaming all evidence against your religious beliefs on demons.
 
zooterkin said:
I deny that I'm a replicant. But then I would, wouldn't I?


Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion... C-beams in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate... tears in the rain...
Click to expand...

You're in on it without even knowing you're in on it. That's how sinister and hypercompetent They are.
 
Vixen said:
Er no! The Gov.uk page written by er, the same Sunak government, which put an embargo on revealing the make and model of the vehicle involved? That one? The one that doesn't want anything to go wrong with FIL's Tata friendship and likely multi-billion pound financial investment in lithium-ion batteries factory...?


I will await the Fire Brigade official report, thank you.
Click to expand...
More childish, conspiratorial, bollocks.
Grow up and admit your were completely wrong.
 
catsmate said:
More childish, conspiratorial, bollocks.
Grow up and admit your were completely wrong.
Click to expand...

Rubbish. The person commissioned to write the GOV.Uk page extolling the virtues and benefits of EV's and rather patronisingly telling us all how very safe they are (when TfL have taken fleets of EV buses out of circulation because of the issue of - ahem - 'accidental ignition') is simply writing an enthusiastic puff piece to 'reassure the public'. The author concerned obviously has to show zeal and marketing skills in the PR job. He or she quoting Beds Fire Chief Hodgkinson's 11 October press release (in his or her own words) is simply that person gaslighting some imaginary opponent of ULEZ rules and pro-Oil lobbyist. It's straightforward propaganda.

What we are looking at here in this thread are the actual facts of a specific matter not the pros and cons of net zero.

The book is open for betting: will the Fire Brigade Report mention the specific make and model and year of the vehicle concerned or will it carry on with a noncommittal descriptive which technically isn't really true but also isn't blatantly lying either.

My sixpence says the latter.


.
 
Last edited:
Vixen said:
Rubbish. The person commissioned to write the GOV.Uk page extolling the virtues and benefits of EV's and rather patronisingly telling us all how very safe they are (when TfL have taken fleets of EV buses out of circulation because of the issue of - ahem - 'accidental ignition') is simply writing an enthusiastic puff piece to 'reassure the public'. The author concerned obviously has to show zeal and marketing skills in the PR job. He or she quoting Beds Fire Chief Hodgkinson's 11 October press release (in his or her own words) is simply that person gaslighting some imaginary opponent of ULEZ rules and pro-Oil lobbyist. It's straightforward propaganda.

What we are looking at here in this thread are the actual facts of a specific matter not the pros and cons of net zero.

The book is open for betting: will the Fire Brigade Report mention the specific make and model and year of the vehicle concerned or will it carry on with a noncommittal descriptive which technically isn't really true but also isn't blatantly lying either.

My sixpence says the latter.


.
Click to expand...

So you don't have any source for your opinion? You were lying when you stated there was an embargo?
 
Vixen said:
...
The book is open for betting: will the Fire Brigade Report mention the specific make and model and year of the vehicle concerned or will it carry on with a noncommittal descriptive which technically isn't really true but also isn't blatantly lying either.

My sixpence says the latter.
Click to expand...

And if that much detail is given no doubt you'll move on to demanding chassis and engine numbers, right?
 
It's a super-secret embargo, and you just have to consider the complete lack of evidence as proof the evidence has been embargoed.

Big Battery has been working on this for a long time. Tesla tried to stop them and look what happened to him. They knew a shift in the world economy from oil to electricity was too big to fail so they've been planting sleeper agents (who don't even know it, just like that Geena Davis movie) to activate as "early adopters" and covering up the inevitable catastrophic fires. Any new buildings in your town where you can't quite recall what used to be there? Hasty coverup of an EV fire. They even socially engineered the word "gaslighting" so that anyone who said they thought they were gaslighting us would be reinforcing the message that gas is bad. You won't believe how deep this rabbit hole goes.

So, no, the fire brigade won't say it was an EV fire because they're all replicants too. You're next.
 
Vixen said:
Rubbish. The person commissioned to write the GOV.Uk page extolling the virtues and benefits of EV's and rather patronisingly telling us all how very safe they are (when TfL have taken fleets of EV buses out of circulation because of the issue of - ahem - 'accidental ignition') is simply writing an enthusiastic puff piece to 'reassure the public'. The author concerned obviously has to show zeal and marketing skills in the PR job. He or she quoting Beds Fire Chief Hodgkinson's 11 October press release (in his or her own words) is simply that person gaslighting some imaginary opponent of ULEZ rules and pro-Oil lobbyist. It's straightforward propaganda.

What we are looking at here in this thread are the actual facts of a specific matter not the pros and cons of net zero.

The book is open for betting: will the Fire Brigade Report mention the specific make and model and year of the vehicle concerned or will it carry on with a noncommittal descriptive which technically isn't really true but also isn't blatantly lying either.

My sixpence says the latter.


.
Click to expand...

The fire service have already said it wasn't an EV.

They released the information months ago.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom