The Great Zaganza
Maledictorian
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2016
- Messages
- 29,847
Landlord of Elon Musk’s X seeks $13.6 million in lawsuit. Here’s why
Apparently the company is behind on its rent payments.
taking a book out of Trump's playbook
Landlord of Elon Musk’s X seeks $13.6 million in lawsuit. Here’s why
Apparently the company is behind on its rent payments.
Just checking in.
An informal poll, is there more free speech or less free speech in the west since Musk bought the platform?
People avoid binary yes no answers, but be brave and try.
free speech does no apply to a privately held company
Will answer properly later, I see people unbanned by Musk to first consider, it is complex.Less.
For example Media Matters being pursued in the courts for publishing a report X agrees was truthful and accurate (truthful and accurate according to X's lawsuit) but X didn't like. Actual legal cases have a chilling effect on organisations publishing truthful articles as they have to weigh in whether they can afford to defend themselves against a even groundless lawsuit.
How many times did Twitter file lawsuits against organisations publishing stories about Twitter it's owners didn't like prior to Musk's purchase?
Will answer properly later, I see people unbanned by Musk to first consider, it is complex.
Could you rephrase that in English please ?
Could you rephrase that in English please ?
English only go good when making a point, English go bad when asked to support any claim.
You want a binary answer to something that obviously isn't measurable?Just checking in.
An informal poll, is there more free speech or less free speech in the west since Musk bought the platform?
People avoid binary yes no answers, but be brave and try.
Will answer properly later, I see people unbanned by Musk to first consider, it is complex.
Both you and Musk have made it abundantly clear that y'all only support free speech that you agree with. That means that you're raging hypocrites.
Just checking in.
An informal poll, is there more free speech or less free speech in the west since Musk bought the platform?
People avoid binary yes no answers, but be brave and try.
Less.Less.
For example Media Matters being pursued in the courts for publishing a report X agrees was truthful and accurate (truthful and accurate according to X's lawsuit) but X didn't like. Actual legal cases have a chilling effect on organisations publishing truthful articles as they have to weigh in whether they can afford to defend themselves against a even groundless lawsuit.
How many times did Twitter file lawsuits against organisations publishing stories about Twitter it's owners didn't like prior to Musk's purchase?
"...and a court order that would reinstate her on the hit series...."
What they would have to redo the whole season to add her "back" in?
Criticise TwiX and get suspended.
https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/...suspended-after-writing-critique-of-platform/
Ah, "free speech".![]()
Less.
TwiX is attempting to silence journalists who produce inconvenient facts.
TeiX is not the government. What don't you understand about that?
I despise Twist for doing that, but think trying to use the power of the state to force them to put the jounalist back on is a case of the cure being worse then the disease.
You do understand that nobody is arguing against Musk having the right to do what he likes with his property, right? We're discussing the rank hypocrisy of his claim to be all about unfettered free speech while his actions frequently give lie to that claim.
It's possible you need to do some homework, reading through this thread and its prequel.