Hmm, well I hope that doesn't land us in a situation where youths experiencing gender dysphoria get the optimal care in some countries, and in other countries their well-being is sacrificed to the culture wars. That would be a shame.
The girls’ mothers were at a loss as to what they should do, but came to the same conclusion — that safeguarding was called for to protect their daughters from rushing into taking powerful hormones and making irreversible physical changes they might later regret.
Tragically, both women have now effectively lost contact with their beloved daughters.
They have also been cut out of all medical discussions pertaining to their children — who, if not already referred to adult gender services, soon will be.
No comment on the suicidality risk, but I think a far more likely scenario is "I can make my child's life hell, they'll still transition eventually, and they'll resent me for the rest of my life, or I can support them now and maintain a good relationship with them".
You're missing a scenario.
"I can affirm my child's beliefs and support them through blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries so that they love me right now, but then they'll hate me when they hit their mid-twenties and realize they were wrong in their beliefs and they resent that I let them damage their bodies and sterilize themselves, and I failed in my duty as a parent to make decisions for their long-term health and wellbeing."
You know how Parents would say you weren't allowed to pierce your ears until you were an adult?
Or get tattoos until you were an adult?
Well, you aren't allowed to transition until you are an adult either.
Sticking with that solves so many problems.
Interesting example of what I'm talking about earlier. This UK tabloid is written very sympathetically to the anti-trans parents of late teen trans children, but it demonstrates exactly how parents digging in their heels to be vicious transphobes accomplish little more than making sure they aren't part of their soon to be adult children's lives.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/24097207/high-court-action-gender-clinics-neurodiverse-teenagers/
The transphobic parents that respond by throwing a tantrum and acting like maniacs likely think they're acting in their child's best interests or will achieve some other good outcome, but usually all they accomplish is making their children deeply resent them and, at best, delaying their transition (medical or social) until they are free from their parent's influence in adulthood.
I still say suicide is a (somewhat) red herring.
It doesn't "prove" anything either way.
If X is wrong it's wrong and if X is right it's right. "Believe X or I'll kill myself and you don't want me to kill myself do you?" (or 3rd person versions of it) are emotional manipulation, not an argument.
Pointing out that people with serious mental health disorders may kill themselves (or have other negative outcomes) if they don't get proper treatment for those disorders is not emotional manipulation.
Ok, but let's not pretend that the current gallop by reactionaries to pass anti-trans laws are motivated by anything but outright animus.
I'm discussing the trans issue in the context that actually exists, not the one you might prefer existed.
Would you just stop making assumptions of malice for anyone who doesn't carry the same torch as you? FFS. Most of them are not motivated by animus, that's your own imagineered motivation. Most of them are motivated by CHILDREN BEING PERMANENTLY HARMED AND STERILIZED WHEN THERE'S INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE THAT LOPPING OFF HEALTH BODY TISSUE AND GIVING KIDS DRUGS THAT DESTROY THEIR FUTILITY ACTUALLY RESULTS IN LONG TERM BENEFITS FOR THE KID, OR THAT THE KID IS EVEN ACTUALLY HAPPIER ABOUT IT FOR MORE THAN A SHORT SPAN OF TIME.
Social media. Which seems to have driven up both teen suicide and gender dysphoria rates.
Social media (which is social the same way North Korea is democratic) causes mental illness.
Lol cope. Sure, they'll come back into their lives aaaaaaaaaaaannnny minute now and tell them how right there were all along.
Finally, some progress!
If we accept that gender dysphoria is a serious mental health disorder, then wouldn't it stand to reason that the first approach should be to treat the mental health disorder? Wouldn't surgery and pharmaceutical intervention be a last resort approach?
To my knowledge, there is no other current mental health disorder where the first treatment path is drugs and surgeries that cause bodily harm and produce sterility.
Here's a concept I'd like enlightened liberals to keep in mind: Sorting males like Lia Thomas and Laurel Hubbard into male sports leagues and record books is not driven by bigotry, but by actual, testable, demonstrable differences between the two sexes in terms of athletic performance. Sometimes one's sex really does matter more than one's subjective sense of self. If you cannot wrap your head around this, do not claim to be driven by skepticism and a dedication to following the evidence wherever it leads.Here's a concept I'd like enlightened centrists to have seared in their head: "You can't ignore that intense bigotry is the factor driving one side of the conversation just because you'd prefer to be having a reasonable, good faith debate".
Yes those wicked birth mothers got exactly what they deserved. Going forward, we can expect the kids to move much more quickly on this. New Zealand is funding an agency called inside out to get transitioning on the road at primary schools.Interesting example of what I'm talking about earlier. This UK tabloid is written very sympathetically to the anti-trans parents of late teen trans children, but it demonstrates exactly how parents digging in their heels to be vicious transphobes accomplish little more than making sure they aren't part of their soon to be adult children's lives.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/24097207/high-court-action-gender-clinics-neurodiverse-teenagers/