The nugget of truth is that Hunter is corruptly enriching himself by virtue of his close familial ties to a US politician.
Has that been established? Whether we like it or not our societies are structured that close familial ties are how most people enrich themselves, there are some ways that can be done that our societies label as "corrupt" but most aren't, so has it established that he has done what his society labels as corrupt?
I thought that was the point under consideration?