The core concept of Socialism is social ownership rather than private ownership of the means of production. A member run co-op would be socialist, so would a government run factory. Funding social services on the other hand isn't Socialist unless the government provides the service directly rather than paying a private company to do it.
Social security isn't really a service, Medicare doesn't provide medical services directly so neither of these is truly socialist in nature. Police and military services, on the other hand are provided directly by the government instead of being contracted out to private mercenaries, so i think you could make a case for them being Socialist.
FWIW DeSantis wanting government to run the improvement zone and be the provider of services to Disney is Socialist in nature, and Socialist in the worst way. The problem with government directly providing goods and services is that government failures can often make the services less efficient. In most cases this is accidental, but lets face it, providing more expensive less efficient services to Disney is the whole point.
