• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Jewish advocate wants Perth trader in 'Nazi' memorabilia closed down

Speaking as a reenactor, because it can be fun.

I reenacted the Battle of Hastings. Am I participating in the bloody conquest of a sovereign kingdom? Am I continuing to oppress the Anglo-Saxons by reenacting the battle that made them all serfs to feudal French lords? No. It's just a fun hobby. With the safety of the participants ensured, nothing is better than fighting with your friends. And if what you're doing is historical reenactment, rather than LARPing (I have done both), it is worth striving for historical accuracy.

But this does mean that if you're reenacting the American Civil War, someone's got to be the Confederates. Hence why someone might be interested in collecting "bad-guy" memorabilia. Nazi memorabilia in particular is problematic because of the way society today views Nazi iconography and imagery, so while technically legal, it's probably not something that anybody should be wanting to get deeply into. Civil war reenactors are seeing this too with the backlash against displaying the Confederate flag. Same thing. Someone's hobby gets unsavoury. Time for a new hobby.


OK, but what are the collectors of Nazi memorabilia enacting, the Holocaust? There's a difference.
 
Exactly. We are not talking about German WWI medals and so on, but Nazi memorabilia.

(Note: I'm assuming you mean WWII here, otherwise it makes no sense)

OK, so define what "Nazi memorabilia" is? You say "We are not talking about German WWII medals", so let me try to pin down what you mean by this...

Would you consider an Iron Cross awarded to a Luftwaffe pilot "Nazi" memorabilia?

How about an Iron Cross awarded to an Oberleutnant of the Waffen-SS who was an officer at a death camp? Nazi memorabilia?

What if the Iron Cross was awarded to an officer when he was in the Wehrmacht, before he later became a full blown Nazi and joined the Allgemeine-SS? "Nazi" memorabilia?

What if that Iron Cross was the one awarded to Oberst (Colonel) Claus von Stauffenberg, a Wermacht officer, member of the Nazi party, who was executed by firing squad for his involvement in the July 20 plot to assassinate Adolf Hitler? "Nazi" memorabilia?

... and how would you know the difference between them anyway?

You see, these are the kinds of problems you are faced with when you try to use vague, ill-defined terms to apply blanket "one size fits all" judgements.
 
Last edited:
(Note: I'm assuming you mean WWII here, otherwise it makes no sense)

OK, so define what "Nazi memorabilia" is? You say "We are not talking about German WWII medals", so let me try to pin down what you mean by this...

Would you consider an Iron Cross awarded to a Luftwaffe pilot "Nazi" memorabilia?

How about an Iron Cross awarded to an Oberleutnant of the Waffen-SS who was an officer at a death camp? Nazi memorabilia?

What if the Iron Cross was awarded to an officer when he was in the Wehrmacht, before he later became a full blown Nazi and joined the Allgemeine-SS? "Nazi" memorabilia?

What if that Iron Cross was the one awarded to Oberst (Colonel) Claus von Stauffenberg, a Wermacht officer, member of the Nazi party, who was executed by firing squad for his involvement in the July 20 plot to assassinate Adolf Hitler? "Nazi" memorabilia?

... and how would you know the difference between them anyway?

You see, these are the kinds of problems you are faced with when you try to use vague, ill-defined terms to apply blanket "one size fits all" judgements.

And then there are the people who want to 'rules lawyer' this all, because it is too difficult to say 'nazis are bad, we don't want to have anything to do with them'.

And to answer your questions. 'yes' to all of the 4 considerations you've given above.
 
It's important to remember that Blewett's business is not really a walk-in public one (except perhaps if his shop in Perth is of that type). These are auctions and items catalogued. It is not just Nazi memorabilia, it is Soviet, Japanese, British, USA, and all kinds of nasty regimes throughout recent history. Whilst I shy away from Nazi memorabilia (ugh) I can see the fascination with history and that there are 'genuine' collectors, not just people with a Nazi fetish. If something is banned, it makes them all the more desirable and expenisve, no?

However, I can also see the point of view of Perth's Jewish population, especially the older ones who may still have handed down memories of Nazi Germany.

One of my old ex-bosses (who sold the business on when I started there but his artwork [which was truly bizarre, still hung everywhere in the offices; a wine shippers] was Rudolph Nassauer, who wrote the prize-winning book, The Hooligan*, about the Third Reich Nazi mindset. Rudy fled to England aged 15, and later married Booker-prizewinning novelist, Bernice Rubens. Anyway, in interviews, Rudy explains that when he returned to Germany he was so full of anger and emotion about what the Germans had done to his people (he was Jewish) he just wanted to flee the country and never return. Plus my best friend at school told me all about her grandparents incredible suffering there, so I have always been sensitive about this issue since. What I can't stand are the extreme Zionist Israelis who are more interested in bullying than debating.


*Peter Owen of The Independent called Nassauer, "an underrated writer whose most important work, The Hooligan, the first in-depth analysis of Nazi psychology, became a Sixties cult book."

The moral is: there are two sides to every issue.
 
The Third Reich is not worthy of remembrance. Some Nazi symbols are already banned in the two biggest states of Australia. Let’s go for a national ban.
Pure virtue signalling. Legislation enacted only for the purpose of expressing a POV.

Like the ban on drugs, it could only create a criminals' paradise.
 
And then there are the people who want to 'rules lawyer' this all, because it is too difficult to say 'nazis are bad, we don't want to have anything to do with them'.

And to answer your questions. 'yes' to all of the 4 considerations you've given above.

Well, I would answer 'no' to all of the above.

To me, they are just medals awarded to soldiers. They are no different from medals such as Purple Hearts awarded to American servicemen, or British medals awarded to British servicemen.
 
Well, I would answer 'no' to all of the above.

To me, they are just medals awarded to soldiers. They are no different from medals such as Purple Hearts awarded to American servicemen, or British medals awarded to British servicemen.

But they're not 'just medals awarded to soldiers', aren't they? They're medals awarded to nazi soldiers and in some of your examples even to ss soldiers.
And they're certainly not equivalent to say a Purple Heart medal.

The Iron Cross medals were awarded to nazi soldiers who distinguished themselves when killing people during the nazi wars of conquest. Wars of conquest whose purpose was to murder, or failing that to enslave, as many people as possible.
 
But they're not 'just medals awarded to soldiers', aren't they? They're medals awarded to nazi soldiers and in some of your examples even to ss soldiers.
And they're certainly not equivalent to say a Purple Heart medal.

The Iron Cross medals were awarded to nazi soldiers who distinguished themselves when killing people during the nazi wars of conquest. Wars of conquest whose purpose was to murder, or failing that to enslave, as many people as possible.

Agreed
 
But they're not 'just medals awarded to soldiers', aren't they?

Yes, they are

They're medals awarded to nazi German/Prussian soldiers....

FTFY

and in some of your examples even to ss soldiers.

Iron Crosses were awarded to Prussian soldiers between 1871–1918, and even earlier during the Napoleonic Wars. The SS didn't even exist then.

And they're certainly not equivalent to say a Purple Heart medal.

A combat medal is a combat medal is a combat medal. Some are more prestigious than others, but when it boils down to it, a medal just a piece of metal used as an award.

The Iron Cross medals were awarded to nazi German/Prussian soldiers who distinguished themselves when killing people during the nazi wars of conquest. Wars of conquest whose purpose was to murder, or failing that to enslave, as many people as possible.

FTFY again.

Soldiers fight in wars because they are made to do so, and will suffer severe consequences if they refuse. Most German solders, sailors and airmen were not Nazis.

https://www.lse.ac.uk/Research/rese...ng-world-war-two-through-eyes-german-soldiers

LSE Professor of International History Sönke Neitzel specialises in the history of war, especially the First and Second World Wars. In 2001 Neitzel discovered a new source for researching the Third Reich and its military machine: secretly recorded conversations of German prisoners of war (POWs) in British and American captivity. The reports, held in the National Archives in London and Washington, D.C., run to about 150,000 pages.

Unlike official documents or even private letters—which German soldiers knew would be reviewed and censored—the recorded chats of the German POWs represent candid, even casual, exchanges between comrades.

Neitzel’s research revealed that most soldiers were not interested in National Socialism or the ‘new order’ that Nazi leaders sought to impose upon Europe. Their worldviews, shaped by the violent exigencies of war, were largely shaped by the core group to which they belonged, their unit, their duty, the next battle, and their weapons of war.

Critically, Neitzel’s research underscored that for most German soldiers the Second World War was in the main a continuation of the First World War: bigger, probably more brutal, but in the end the same war for the same reason, which was defence of the Homeland against foreign aggression.​
 
Yes, they are



FTFY



Iron Crosses were awarded to Prussian soldiers between 1871–1918, and even earlier during the Napoleonic Wars. The SS didn't even exist then.



A combat medal is a combat medal is a combat medal. Some are more prestigious than others, but when it boils down to it, a medal just a piece of metal used as an award.



FTFY again.

Soldiers fight in wars because they are made to do so, and will suffer severe consequences if they refuse. Most German solders, sailors and airmen were not Nazis.

https://www.lse.ac.uk/Research/rese...ng-world-war-two-through-eyes-german-soldiers

LSE Professor of International History Sönke Neitzel specialises in the history of war, especially the First and Second World Wars. In 2001 Neitzel discovered a new source for researching the Third Reich and its military machine: secretly recorded conversations of German prisoners of war (POWs) in British and American captivity. The reports, held in the National Archives in London and Washington, D.C., run to about 150,000 pages.

Unlike official documents or even private letters—which German soldiers knew would be reviewed and censored—the recorded chats of the German POWs represent candid, even casual, exchanges between comrades.

Neitzel’s research revealed that most soldiers were not interested in National Socialism or the ‘new order’ that Nazi leaders sought to impose upon Europe. Their worldviews, shaped by the violent exigencies of war, were largely shaped by the core group to which they belonged, their unit, their duty, the next battle, and their weapons of war.

Critically, Neitzel’s research underscored that for most German soldiers the Second World War was in the main a continuation of the First World War: bigger, probably more brutal, but in the end the same war for the same reason, which was defence of the Homeland against foreign aggression.​

I know the Iron cross was used before the nazi era, but we were talking about nazi memorabilia, not those of the German empire or of Prussia. Nazi memorabilia.

And yes of course the nazis were just defending their homeland from the foreign aggression of countries like Luxemburg, Denmark or for example the Netherlands.
And in defending their homeland they just happened to slaughter the civilians here in their thousands upon thousands!
Because nazi soldiers were just like any other, more than 100.000 jewish fellow Dutchmen slaughtered notwithstanding. And let’s not speak about the untold milions of Polish inhabitants they slaughtered.

But yeah, let’s pretend the nazis were just like any other soldiers and that collecting their memorabilia is just innocent fun. :rolleyes:
 
I know the Iron cross was used before the nazi era, but we were talking about nazi memorabilia, not those of the German empire or of Prussia. Nazi memorabilia.

And yes of course the nazis were just defending their homeland from the foreign aggression of countries like Luxemburg, Denmark or for example the Netherlands.
And in defending their homeland they just happened to slaughter the civilians here in their thousands upon thousands!
Because nazi soldiers were just like any other, more than 100.000 jewish fellow Dutchmen slaughtered notwithstanding. And let’s not speak about the untold milions of Polish inhabitants they slaughtered.

But yeah, let’s pretend the nazis were just like any other soldiers and that collecting their memorabilia is just innocent fun. :rolleyes:


None of that has anything to do with the collecting of memorabilia. People's feelings should never override the rights of others.

People have the right to collect what they want - stamps, coins, bottles, medals, records, items from rock bands, sports teams, actors or famous people. No-one, including you, has yet put up a convincing argument that the collecting of Nazi memorabilia causes any actual, unavoidable harm to anyone. Anyone who feels harmed by someone else collecting Nazi memorabilia can avoid that harm by simply having nothing to do with the memorabilia or the collector - if you don't like certain music, don't listen to it.

When someone is able to come up with a convincing and/or compelling argument that collecting Nazi memorabilia causes actual, measurable harm to people (and it muss be harm that they cannot avoid being exposed to) then I will reconsider my position. Until such time, I remain unmoved and unswerving in my opinion.
 
There is this story in Finland very recently.

A MAN WHO COLLECTED MATERIAL FOR A NEO-NAZI ORGANIZATION has been sentenced to four years in prison for a stabbing in Aurajokiranta. A 22-year-old man unexpectedly stabbed another man in the back in July.

Read more: Nazi props and Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf were found in Turku's knifeman's home

According to the prosecutor, there was a racist motive behind the act, and the stabber chose his victim based on race, skin color, descent, national or ethnic origin, religion or belief.

According to the district court, the racist motive was not shown in the case.
HS


Click on link to see the type of memorabilia this neo-nazi collected, including the hateful flag. This guy knifed a complete stranger in the back who was of what they euphemistically call 'foreign background'.

The convict saw a man with a foreign background talking on the phone on Itäinen Rantakatu on Friday evening. The 22-year-old went after the man. The stabber did not know the man. When the victim walked to the riverbank, the 22-year-old suddenly hit him with a knife below the right shoulder blade. After that, the stabber quickly left the scene.

He was very lucky he didn't die, if not for quick medical care after dragging himself to a nearby restaurant, and now he has a fear of going out.
 
There is this story in Finland very recently.

HS


Click on link to see the type of memorabilia this neo-nazi collected, including the hateful flag. This guy knifed a complete stranger in the back who was of what they euphemistically call 'foreign background'.



He was very lucky he didn't die, if not for quick medical care after dragging himself to a nearby restaurant, and now he has a fear of going out.

You missed the chance to do this...

A MAN WHO COLLECTED MATERIAL FOR A NEO-NAZI ORGANIZATION has been sentenced to four years in prison
for a stabbing in Aurajokiranta.
 
There is this story in Finland very recently

HS


Click on link to see the type of memorabilia this neo-nazi collected, including the hateful flag. This guy knifed a complete stranger in the back who was of what they euphemistically call 'foreign background'.

He was very lucky he didn't die, if not for quick medical care after dragging himself to a nearby restaurant, and now he has a fear of going out.

There is this story in Germany not very recently.

AH

Click on to see the type of paintings this artist painted. The guy was responsible for the deaths of 6 million Jews and a few million others in what was euphemistically called 'The Final Solution'

He was very lucky he didn't die (someone moved the bomb before it went off) but he later died by his own hand anyway.

- - - - -

OK, I'm just having a bit of fun at your expense, but I trust the point is clear.

This guy in Finland collected this memorabilia and he was also a scumbag - he tried to murder the "foreigner" because he was a scumbag NOT because he was a collector.
 
Last edited:
None of that has anything to do with the collecting of memorabilia. People's feelings should never override the rights of others.

People have the right to collect what they want - stamps, coins, bottles, medals, records, items from rock bands, sports teams, actors or famous people. No-one, including you, has yet put up a convincing argument that the collecting of Nazi memorabilia causes any actual, unavoidable harm to anyone. Anyone who feels harmed by someone else collecting Nazi memorabilia can avoid that harm by simply having nothing to do with the memorabilia or the collector - if you don't like certain music, don't listen to it.

When someone is able to come up with a convincing and/or compelling argument that collecting Nazi memorabilia causes actual, measurable harm to people (and it muss be harm that they cannot avoid being exposed to) then I will reconsider my position. Until such time, I remain unmoved and unswerving in my opinion.

Well. Luckily the law does have something to say about this, specifically article 137e of the Dutch criminal law. Anybody of 'law and order', should recognize this as being a compelling rreason.

But even if this would not be the case. Some people hide so much behind the concept about what they 'could do' instead of what they 'should do'.

Us common decent people do recognize these kinds of people for the filth that they are and indeed don't want anything to do with them.
And if really needed, we can always verbally 'spit them in the face'. Or literal, that is of course also always an option.
 
There is this story in Germany not very recently.

AH

Click on to see the type of paintings this artist painted. The guy was responsible for the deaths of 6 million Jews and a few million others in what was euphemistically called 'The Final Solution'

He was very lucky he didn't die (someone moved the bomb before it went off) but he later died by his own hand anyway.

- - - - -

OK, I'm just having a bit of fun at your expense, but I trust the point is clear.

This guy in Finland collected this memorabilia and he was also a scumbag - he tried to murder the "foreigner" because he was a scumbag NOT because he was a collector.

Except that the kind of collection he had was because he was the scumbag he was.
It was a scumbags collection, so to say.
 
Except that the kind of collection he had was because he was the scumbag he was.
It was a scumbags collection, so to say.

...and other people who collect the same sorts of things are not scumbags.

You are making judgements against people based on no evidence other than your own prejudices.
 

Back
Top Bottom