9/11: The Smoking Gun

[threadworm]

Nyuck, Nyuck. Because all "no planers" are associated with JudyWoodtards.

You can all be scooped from the same swill bucket.

 

[beachnut]

Fantasy missiles

I must have missed where you explained how the jet wing managed to cut the steel behind the aluminum sheeting but didn't cut the sheeting that covered the steel, and in fact, pushed it out in the opposite direction than the wing was traveling. That's one magic loogie!

A legacy of woo for your loved ones.

How did your fantasy missile(s) hold 10,000 gallons of jet fuel to make the exact jet fuel fireball a Boeing jet made, or in your case of fantasy woo not a Boeing jet, ??? - how did your fantasy version make the fireball?

You realize the jets which hit the WTC towers are missing, not one missile is missing.

Physics, not used for the missile fantasy, just a sad delusion. Like Judy's delusions, dumber than dirt claims based on BS.

Are you upset the Taliban was out of power for 20 years? Why do you apologize for terrorists with a silly fantasy of missiles, mocking the murder of thousands.

There is nothing wrong with being antiwar. Making up dumber than dirt lies to protest... dumber than dirt. Mocking the murder of thousands with lies.

 

[Cosmic Yak]

I have pointed out to yankee451 that, according to his own figures, the missiles would have been too wide to pass between the columns without impacting them.
I have yet to see him reassess his claims in the light of this fact.

Nyuck, Nyuck. Because all "no planers" are associated with JudyWoodtards.

And he breezes straight past that inconvenient facts once again.
Strange how 'truthseekers' are so didinterested in facts.

 

[smartcooky]

A legacy of woo for your loved ones.

How did your fantasy missile(s) hold 10,000 gallons of jet fuel to make the exact jet fuel fireball a Boeing jet made, or in your case of fantasy woo not a Boeing jet, ??? - how did your fantasy version make the fireball?

Oh, and not just the visible fireball either.

Jet fuel literally whistled down the elevator shafts and exploded, engulfing people on floors immediately below the impact point - many of whom ultimately survived to tell their stories. People dozens of floors below told of the overpowering smell of unburned jet fuel as they made their way down the stair wells to escape. How did these alleged cruise missiles, which all up weight only 2,700 to 3,900 pounds carry what would have amounted to 70,000+ pounds of Jet A1?

 

[TJM]

No, see, them towers were really just shells of buildings and there were in fact no occupants. All that bilge about planes, fireballs and those poor widdle victims is just something you saw on the teevee, right Steve?

 

[Robin]

"...wings had entered the wall..."

This pretty much nullifies the video from the beginning.

Don't you know what happened to the wings?

 

[Robin]

"We?" Do you have a mouse in your pocket?

Why don't you just explain how the jet wing could cut three sides of the steel, but missed the aluminum sheeting that covered the steel?

For a start it clearly didn't miss the aluminium cladding, you. An see the damage.

The cladding has more or less the same damage pattern as the column if you look closely. The damage is at the front and on part of the sides.

 

[Robin]

What happened to the rest of the missile including the right wing?
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_13409632c4c4c0280a.png[/qimg]

Where's the right wing of the missile that would have ripped that cladding off?
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_13409632c4cd49670c.png[/qimg]

You clearly don't care about your different pieces of evidence corroborating/matching each other. All in the name of fitting a square peg into a round hole.

Very sloppy work indeed!

Yes, I think Yankee451 has demolished his own claim right there where he has to make the rest of the missile disappear leaving just the warhead.

All this stuff.

 

[Allen773]

I swear to God these conspiracy theorists are being paid by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to distract attention from---

Oh wait, now I'm turning into a conspiracy theorist!

 

[Crazy Chainsaw]

I swear to God these conspiracy theorists are being paid by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to distract attention from---

Oh wait, now I'm turning into a conspiracy theorist!

When you realize these conspiracy theorists over looked the fact they have mental Illness, the conspiracy theories start too make sense to you.
They were all debunked decades ago, nothing left but crazy now.

 

[Fonebone]

See image below.

Are you saying the warhead/missile impacted the perimeter columns where the red arrow points, ripped the steel plate in the blue oval away, and separated the aluminum cladding from the column pushing it in the direction of the yellow arrows?




How did the missile/warhead's wings not cut the aluminum cladding like it did the steel plates? How did it just push it aside?

That's one magic missile!!!

[FONT=&quot]Maybe it was a missile designed to fly without wings.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] I think Yankee is correct on one point and incorrect on a second point. The evidence indicates a cruise missile struck each WTC tower at a near perfect perpendicular angle in the X axis and created the center circular round 767 fuselage scars. The explosion of the cruise missile created the circular hole. The payload of the missile, Napalm II, created the JP4 fireball illusion. The fireball also served to camouflage the the two projectiles that created the plane wing scars seconds after the cruise missile impacts/explosions.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]A separate projectile struck the exterior column structure at an extreme oblique angle to create the illusion of a left wing impact. A second projectile, also launched at an extreme oblique angle' from slightly higher position was used to create the illusion of a right wing impact on both WTC towers. In both towers the left wing impact outline was elevated from left to right indicating the projectile[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]that created the impact scar illusion was launched from a position lower than[/FONT][FONT=&quot] the missile that was camouflaged as a Boeing 767 creating the center round[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]hole of the cruise missile. The combination of the cruise missile in the center and the two separate projectiles from oblique angles created the illusion of the aircraft complete with a pseudo dihedral appearance. Modern cruise missiles, circa 2001, had a target precision accuracy of several meters allowing the two projectile firing platforms that created the aircraft wing scar illusions[/FONT][FONT=&quot] could be pre-positioned beforehand. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Both WTC tower strikes were carefully staged and executed illusions that formed the basis of the Psyops .[/FONT]

 

[beachnut]

these claim can't get dumber... but they do

[FONT=&quot]Maybe it was a missile designed to fly without wings.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] I think Yankee is correct on one point and incorrect on a second point. The evidence indicates a cruise missile struck each WTC tower at a near perfect perpendicular angle in the X axis and created the center circular round 767 fuselage scars. The explosion of the cruise missile created the circular hole. The payload of the missile, Napalm II, created the JP4 fireball illusion.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]A separate projectile struck the exterior column structure at an extreme oblique angle to create the illusion of a left wing impact. A second projectile, also launched at an extreme oblique angle' from slightly higher position was used to create the illusion of a right wing impact on both WTC towers. In both towers the left wing impact outline was elevated from left to right indicating the projectile[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]that created the impact scar illusion was launched from a position lower than[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]the missile that was camouflaged as a Boeing 767 creating the center round[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]hole of the cruise missile. The combination of the cruise missile in the center and the two separate projectiles from oblique angles created the illusion of the aircraft complete with a pseudo dihedral appearance. Modern cruise missiles, circa 2001, had a target precision accuracy of several meters allowing the two projectile firing platforms that created the aircraft scar illusion[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]could be pre-positioned beforehand. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Both WTC tower strikes were carefully staged and executed illusions that formed the basis of the Psyops .[/FONT]

NUTS

 

[Fonebone]

Instead of refuting the evidence you choose to quote an American Army hero from WWII ...

General Anthony Clement "Nuts" McAuliffe ???
https://www.geni.com/people/General-Anthony-Nuts-McAuliffe/6000000013342410096#:~:text=General%20Anthony%20Clement%20%22Nuts%22%20McAuliffe%20%28July%202%2C%201898,single-word%20reply%20to%20a%20German%20surrender%20ultimatum%3A%20%22Nuts%21%22


[excerpt]

General Anthony Clement "Nuts" McAuliffe (July 2, 1898 – August 11, 1975) was the United States Army general who
commanded the 101st Airborne Division troops defending Bastogne, Belgium during the Battle of the Bulge in World War II.

He is famous for his single-word reply to a German surrender ultimatum: "Nuts!" [/excerpt]


Some have something to say...
And some have to say something

 

[beachnut]

when spewing nonsese, double down - 9/11 truth

Instead of refuting the evidence you choose to quote a hero from WWII ...

General Anthony Clement "Nuts" McAuliffe ???
https://www.geni.com/people/General-Anthony-Nuts-McAuliffe/6000000013342410096#:~:text=General%20Anthony%20Clement%20%22Nuts%22%20McAuliffe%20%28July%202%2C%201898,single-word%20reply%20to%20a%20German%20surrender%20ultimatum%3A%20%22Nuts%21%22


[excerpt]

General Anthony Clement "Nuts" McAuliffe (July 2, 1898 – August 11, 1975) was the United States Army general who
commanded the 101st Airborne Division troops defending Bastogne, Belgium during the Battle of the Bulge in World War II.

He is famous for his single-word reply to a German surrender ultimatum: "Nuts!" [/excerpt]


Some have something to say...
And some have to say something

You have no evidence, no facts, no rational claims this issue...

My Dad was there... He heard what the General said that day in Bastogne.

The reply is perfect for your fantasy version of 9/11.

 

[Oystein]

Alrighty, Fonebone, let me quote ALL the evidence (and delete the bare, unsupported claims borne out of sheer imagination) in your post - and refute it:

Maybe... I think... could be ...

Oops! No evidence there! Nothing to refute!

Ths is what the dying 9/11 "Truth Movement" has come to in 2022: Old chumps pretending their fantasies become evidence by posting them on an internet board.

 

[Fonebone]

You have no evidence, no facts, no rational claims this issue...

My Dad was there... He heard what the General said that day in Bastogne.

The reply is perfect for your fantasy version of 9/11.

Every soldier tells "war stories" to their children Beachnut.
Was your father a member of General McAuliff's staff ?
Here is a group picture of the general and his staff 2 days later on
Christmas Day. If you cannot find your father in the group photo at this link
https://militaryhistorynow.com/2020...o-the-german-surrender-ultimatum-at-bastogne/
I'm afraid your father's story may be ....
Bic?

 

[Robin]

Instead of refuting the evidence ...

What evidence? You didn't supply any evidence.

 

[smartcooky]

[FONT=&quot]Maybe it was a missile designed to fly without wings.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] I think Yankee is correct on one point and incorrect on a second point. The evidence indicates a cruise missile struck each WTC tower at a near perfect perpendicular angle in the X axis and created the center circular round 767 fuselage scars. The explosion of the cruise missile created the circular hole. The payload of the missile, Napalm II, created the JP4 fireball illusion. The fireball also served to camouflage the the two projectiles that created the plane wing scars seconds after the cruise missile impacts/explosions.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]A separate projectile struck the exterior column structure at an extreme oblique angle to create the illusion of a left wing impact. A second projectile, also launched at an extreme oblique angle' from slightly higher position was used to create the illusion of a right wing impact on both WTC towers. In both towers the left wing impact outline was elevated from left to right indicating the projectile[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]that created the impact scar illusion was launched from a position lower than[/FONT][FONT=&quot] the missile that was camouflaged as a Boeing 767 creating the center round[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]hole of the cruise missile. The combination of the cruise missile in the center and the two separate projectiles from oblique angles created the illusion of the aircraft complete with a pseudo dihedral appearance. Modern cruise missiles, circa 2001, had a target precision accuracy of several meters allowing the two projectile firing platforms that created the aircraft wing scar illusions[/FONT][FONT=&quot] could be pre-positioned beforehand. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Both WTC tower strikes were carefully staged and executed illusions that formed the basis of the Psyops .[/FONT]

Yet no-one.... NO-ONE saw missiles impact. NO-ONE saw them approach New York City. No ATC radar detected them. EVERYONE who was there saw airliners hit the buildings, EVERY camera recorded airliners hitting the buildings.

 

[Cosmic Yak]

Maybe it was a missile designed to fly without wings.
I think Yankee is correct on one point and incorrect on a second point. The evidence indicates a cruise missile struck each WTC tower at a near perfect perpendicular angle in the X axis and created the center

1. Cruise missiles have wings. If it didn't have wings, then it wasn't a cruise missile.
2. That doesn't matter, because you're just making stuff up. Your fantasies do not count as evidence.
3. Does your new-found adherence to yankee451's missile fantasy mean you have abandoned your previous CD fantasy?

 

[Axxman300]

[FONT=&quot]Maybe it was a missile designed to fly without wings.[/FONT]

Cool, that would be a regular missile. Please tell us which type of missile. Be specific. Was it air-to-ground, or ground to ground? If it was ground-to-ground, who launched it?

I think Yankee is correct on one point and incorrect on a second point. The evidence indicates a cruise missile struck each WTC tower at a near perfect perpendicular angle in the X axis and created the center circular round 767 fuselage scars.

Cool, where'd it come from? What is the "evidence" indicating a cruise missile strike? I ask only due to the lack of anything about the WTC impacts looking like a cruise missile. Also, no cruise missiles have ever been reported missing by the USAF or USN. No ground crew or Navy destroyer crew, or submarine crew has ever reported firing cruise missiles within 400 miles of Manhattan in 2001.

Do you even know how to launch a cruise missile?

The explosion of the cruise missile created the circular hole.

Then why was there no sound from the warhead detonating? I ask because you could have heard it in New Jersey, yet all the videos show it the sound of a large jet crashing into a steel building at high speed.

Wait, did they use a silencer?

The payload of the missile, Napalm II, created the JP4 fireball illusion.

First question: What is Napalm II?

Second question: What model cruise missile holds 20,000 gallons anything?

The fireball also served to camouflage the the two projectiles that created the plane wing scars seconds after the cruise missile impacts/explosions.

Lol, no.

A separate projectile struck the exterior column structure at an extreme oblique angle to create the illusion of a left wing impact. A second projectile, also launched at an extreme oblique angle' from slightly higher position was used to create the illusion of a right wing impact on both WTC towers. In both towers the left wing impact outline was elevated from left to right indicating the projectile

I could ask why none of the 150,000 eye-witnesses never saw all of this incoming missile traffic, and why it is invisible on all video recordings, and why none of these warheads made any noise...but I won't. This claim is stupid.

Why not just hijack a pair of 767s and crash them into the buildings?...You know...Like Al Qaeda did on 9-11.

that created the impact scar illusion was launched from a position lower than the missile that was camouflaged as a Boeing 767 creating the center round

Dumb. Who made this missile? Why "disguise" it as a 767? You just said a cruise missile did this, but now you're saying a missile disguised as a jet did it? Make up your mind.

The combination of the cruise missile in the center and the two separate projectiles from oblique angles created the illusion of the aircraft complete with a pseudo dihedral appearance. Modern cruise missiles, circa 2001, had a target precision accuracy of several meters allowing the two projectile firing platforms that created the aircraft wing scar illusions could be pre-positioned beforehand.

Delusional. And you've contradicted yourself. Do you even read what you write? You just said the secondary strike was a cruise missile designed to look like a 767, but now your back to conventional cruise missiles. Why not take the intellectually sound CT tangent of remotely piloted 767s crashing into the buildings? Why do you need cruise missiles?

Both WTC tower strikes were carefully staged and executed illusions that formed the basis of the Psyops .

How do you know 9-11 Truth isn't a PsyOp? If you think about it, you and your fellow Truthers killed the anti-war movement with your lies. Who benefits from 9-11 Truth killing the anti-war movement.

Who are you and Yankee really working for?