Ranks right up there with "If your aunt had balls she'd be your uncle."If the 2020 election was stolen, then Donald Trump must be re-installed as President. It’s right there in the US Constitution, between the UFO Clause and the NWO Clause.
I don’t make the rules.
I wonder when the next "this time for sure" Trump reinstatement date will be announced now that the last one came and went with no fanfare.
Bubba's posting again after his >5 month imposed/voluntary sabbatical, so maybe we'll find out.
Lindell is Trump's Harold Camping.
I am now convinced, given the increasing insanity of is rants, that Lindell has fallen off the wagon and is back on Peruvian Marching Powder.
Time told.
After two years and who knows how many millions spent Florida Desantis cultists proudly announce they have found …. 20 cases of voter fraud….all of them hard-case felons who registered not know there were exceptions to allowing felons to vote.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politi...on-police-unit-announces-20-voter-fraud-cases
Then they should counter-sue for criminal entrapment. Times 20. Which is what it is, and DeSantis is responsible. And I expect that's a much more serious crime than unintentionally voting-while-unregistered.Desantis’ big win is turning into a bust as it turns out election officials thought these people could legitimately vote. So his little SWAT raids were not on die-hard cheats but on people who were entrapped by Desantis’ Byzantine election rules.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics...raud-election-police-desantis-entrapment.html
The film's allegations were often vague, and largely based on data that have not been made public. As a result, some elements of the film were difficult, if not impossible, to fully fact-check. The book adds new details, however, which NPR has been able to scrutinize.
NPR contacted organizations named in the book for comment about some of D'Souza's written claims. They referred to passages in the book as "malarkey," "inaccurate," and "trash."
One group, whose data are cited in the book, said it would request a correction. Another raised the possibility of legal action.
I'm interested to see how the reportage issue survives legal scrutiny. Various defendants such as Fox News are trying to escape liability for defamation by saying, in effect, "We were just reporting the newsworthy claims being made by newsworthy people, without commenting on the truth or falsity of them." What role does amplifying those claims to reach an audience of millions play in defamation? How does one's choice of guests create a responsibility? Does any news organization have a responsibility for the claims made by its sources?
The team of so-called “Kraken” lawyers behind efforts overturn the 2020 presidential election outcome and keep Donald Trump in office has accused a federal judge in Michigan of targeting them for sanctions because of their political views.
During the presidency of President Donald Trump, it became evident to me that the prophecies about the Son of Man, as predicted by Jesus in the Bible were, to a significant extent, fulfilled at the hands of Mr Trump. The Bible speaks about two different Christs-or Messiahs. Jesus, the Son of God is the one Christ, whereas the Son of Man is the other. Jesus always referred to the Son of Man in the third person.