• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Answer to the Problem of Evil

Has "free will" been defined in this thread? It seems like something different is being intended by the term in recent posts than in the OP.
Have you got a definition of "free will" that would render the discussion in this thread moot?
 
Apparently. It's your claim, you explain what you meant.
"We have no free will" is your claim, not mine.

Yes
Because you can't exercise free will if you can never sure if God made you do something for not.
How frequently would one's free will have to be overridden for this to be true? Hourly? Weekly? Once every billiion years?
 
Umm. Yes. If the god entity existed.
That is a long stretch.

Assuming that you really believe this then it means that your argument is that there is no such thing as free will. God programmed everybody to do whatever they do.

Have you got a biblical reference for this position or are you just making up your own story?
 
Before we disprove free will, have we defined it yet? I'm not at all sure that the same idea of free will is being argued about as was put forward in the OP.
 
That is a long stretch.

Assuming that you really believe this then it means that your argument is that there is no such thing as free will. God programmed everybody to do whatever they do.

Have you got a biblical reference for this position or are you just making up your own story?

Isaiah 45:7 King James Bible
I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.
 
You can stop right there. The assumption is that God created people with free will. He didn't program people to be thieves, rapists or murderers. Those are choices that people are free to make or not make entirely of their own volition.

How convenient! As a matter of necessity you now invented a godthingy that "creates" hollow people ready for them to program their own nature through a now convoluted process called "free will".

As I already said "free will" is an invention born in the need for the deity to go scot-free for the evil in the world. You're just one of many tailoring "free will" according to your rhetorical needs. You simply failed.
 
Before we disprove free will, have we defined it yet? I'm not at all sure that the same idea of free will is being argued about as was put forward in the OP.

The theist side of this discussion has chosen to call free will the ability to choose. Goddygod gave free will to Montoto and Montoto freely chose to be a child rapist.

That's not the way it works. Computer programs make choices. Any machine with a slot to insert loose change makes choices. That's not the point. "Free will" suppose the ability of having chosen differently provided all the circunstances are the same.

We should start to pile up here all the studies done on the matter of people and their "choices". Even discussing how magicians exploit the seamingly free choices of volunteers in their acts. This universe isn't hard deterministic but it's apparently highly deterministic and that leaves little room for a "free" to go together with our "choices".
 
The theist side of this discussion has chosen to call free will the ability to choose. Goddygod gave free will to Montoto and Montoto freely chose to be a child rapist.

That's not the way it works. Computer programs make choices. Any machine with a slot to insert loose change makes choices. That's not the point. "Free will" suppose the ability of having chosen differently provided all the circunstances are the same.

We should start to pile up here all the studies done on the matter of people and their "choices". Even discussing how magicians exploit the seamingly free choices of volunteers in their acts. This universe isn't hard deterministic but it's apparently highly deterministic and that leaves little room for a "free" to go together with our "choices".
I'm not sure that this is exactly true. The OP's link contains the following statement:

"Since Allah Almighty knows who will do what with their free will and what their character will be like even before they are created, "

It looks like we are talking about a type of free will where your choices are predestined, much in the manner of a computer program.

The issues of determinism and free will were known to Aristotle. I don't know about Islam, but this was integrated into Christianity in the first millennium.
 
"We have no free will" is your claim, not mine.


How frequently would one's free will have to be overridden for this to be true? Hourly? Weekly? Once every billiion years?
If it's possible, then how often the possibility is exercised is irrelevant. If God can override free will and can decide when to do it, then he may treat us to an arbitrary period during which we can act as if we had it, and in which our actions are identical to those of one who has it, but it's a dispensation. It's not real free will. We're characters in a story of which he is the editor.
 
When I haven't been to the barber in a while, my hair starts rucking up in back. Not much, it's just a wee frill.
 
In doing my search for the verse in my previous post I came upon this one in 1 Samuel 18:

10 And it came to pass on the morrow, that the evil spirit from God came upon Saul, and he prophesied in the midst of the house: and David played with his hand, as at other times: and there was a javelin in Saul's hand.

You can't make this **** up - well I guess some one did.


:bunpan
 
How convenient! As a matter of necessity you now invented a godthingy that "creates" hollow people ready for them to program their own nature through a now convoluted process called "free will".

As I already said "free will" is an invention born in the need for the deity to go scot-free for the evil in the world. You're just one of many tailoring "free will" according to your rhetorical needs. You simply failed.
The failure is all yours.

If the "godthingy" is purely born of the imagination then there is no rule that says you can't imagine that this "godthingy" created people with free will.

You need to deny free will so that this imaginary "godthingy" can only be described as evil.
 
If it's possible, then how often the possibility is exercised is irrelevant makes all the difference in the world.
ftfy.

It is ridiculous to say that during their life, somebody made 1,000,000 unforced choices and 1 choice was forced therefore all 1,000,001 choices were forced.
 
The theist side of this discussion has chosen to call free will the ability to choose. Goddygod gave free will to Montoto and Montoto freely chose to be a child rapist.

That's not EXACTLY the way it works.
ftfy.

Whether free will can exist or not in a deterministic universe is a scientific argument and has nothing to do with the imagination.
 
ftfy.

It is ridiculous to say that during their life, somebody made 1,000,000 unforced choices and 1 choice was forced therefore all 1,000,001 choices were forced.
You miss the point entirely. Of course the unforced choices were not forced, but is that all that free will is? If a god is watching you and proven to be willing and able to intervene, you are acting at his sufferance. Your actions might seem free, and might be the same as what you would do if you were free, and you might be led to believe you are free and might act as you would if you were, but if there is a god that can, at his discretion, intervene, then your freedom is a fiction, even if it's a very skillful, well engineered, and believable one.

If there's a law I have no desire to break, and if I live my entire life without breaking it, I can be effectively free, and behave as if I were free, but it's conditional.
 

Back
Top Bottom