cosmicaug
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2012
- Messages
- 1,963
To take that generously, women are allowed to be defended in court as maybe having justification, even if their actions are "otherwise criminal." So not necessarily an instant conviction if you've got the money (or, given Louisiana, the right color of skin). They're still "murderers," though. I do admit that I could be confused with some of the specifics of the legalese, of course. Either way, removing "implantation" is more directly an attack on contraceptives (and potentially some early pregnancy loss that involved failures to implant, given the flow of things).Present law authorizes the defense of justification in certain circumstances, including when
any crime, except murder, is committed through the compulsion of threats by another of
death or great bodily harm, and the offender reasonably believes the person making the
threats is present and would immediately carry out the threats if the crime were not
committed.
Proposed law amends the above present law defense of justification to exclude murder where
the victim is not an unborn child.
That text was not too clear to me on first reading (or second or third, for that matter). It seems to be saying that, up to the point of this bill being passed and enacted, certain defenses exist for what otherwise would be criminal acts up to but not including murder; and that this bill extends these defensible crimes to include murder as long as the murder does not involve an "unborn child".
If my reading is not completely wrong, it would seem to make abortion from fertilization onward as special category of murder that might be less excusable than regular murder?