• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: Cancel culture IRL Part 2

On the side that cancel culture does not exist Joe Rogan can call black people apes and not lose his $100 million deal. Clearly society is getting new standards with regards to blatant racism.
 
Brand new standards revealed by an episode from over ten years ago.

Which most people were not aware of until now. Finding it acceptable now is still relevant to standards today.

That part isn't exactly complex.
 
Author Kate Clanchy discussing her experience with 'Sensitivity Readers' (aka Censorship Officers...)


The excerpt is the most telling point of all:


I struggle with all this. I baulk, besides, perhaps snobbishly, at their language: the imprecision of phrases such as “feels like the kind of saying that could be deemed insensitive these days”, or “white knight tone/verve” (verve?). I snarl when Excel helpfully suggests I have made a typo with e. e. cummings, and lost his capital letters. It upsets me in particular, when so many of their criticisms depend on it, that none of the Readers deploy the word “irony”, but use “sarcasm”, “jocular aside” and “subtlety” instead, always as negatives. Comment Button condemns my entire chapter on Prizes as “it shows none of the adults involved in a good light”. Indeed it doesn’t. They are being satirised, even though one of them was me.


https://unherd.com/2022/02/how-sensitivity-readers-corrupted-literature/
 
Author Kate Clanchy discussing her experience with 'Sensitivity Readers' (aka Censorship Officers...)


The excerpt is the most telling point of all:





https://unherd.com/2022/02/how-sensitivity-readers-corrupted-literature/


Counterpoint:
Cancel culture is a term bounced around by people afraid of accountability. But freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences. We had every right to critique a publicly available book on a public forum, not least because the author had drawn attention to the racist language in it herself. Singh, Suleyman and I did not want to “cancel” Clanchy or her book, as evidenced by the educational links continuously shared by Singh that pointed towards writing about other cultures, and my own pleas to our detractors to understand why the language was so distressing. None of us disputed the fine work Clanchy has done with her pupils’ poetry. None of us had any hand in Picador’s decision to rewrite the book, nor do we feel that the book should be rewritten. No one is policing imaginations or telling authors what they should or shouldn’t write about. But we owe each other due diligence before we set out to write.
 
Not that I recall, no.

Does it make sense to act like Rogan is trying to defend it now and must therefore be entirely scrubbed from all streaming services?

About as much sense as it makes that a mook like Joe Rogan was given such a ridiculously large platform in the first place. No one has an inalienable right to a hit podcast, so whether Rogan is on every streaming service or none, his right to free speech remains intact.
 
About as much sense as it makes that a mook like Joe Rogan was given such a ridiculously large platform in the first place. No one has an inalienable right to a hit podcast, so whether Rogan is on every streaming service or none, his right to free speech remains intact.
Not sure why you're bringing up legal rights. Seems to me those are downstream of culture, or at least in another area.
 
Last edited:
Not that I recall, no.

Does it make sense to act like Rogan is trying to defend it now and must therefore be entirely scrubbed from all streaming services?

Oh I'm sorry I thought we were talking reality, not you the insane lying scenario in your head. My apologies, how could I have been so mistaken.

Nothing you said had any connection to actual reality.
 
Great. What’s the problem then?

Because we've proven to scientific levels of rigor that the second the people who complain the most about "Cancel Culture" actually clearly define it either:

1. It ceases to exist.
2. It makes them look really, really bad.
 
Which streaming services ought not cancel Rogan, in your view? I thought the pro-cancellation folks were pretty much on the same page for once, led by *checks notes* an anti-GMO musician.

Wait, isn't Neil Young trying to cancel himself over those homophobic remarks he made in the past? It's so hard to keep track.
 
Which streaming services ought not cancel Rogan, in your view? I thought the pro-cancellation folks were pretty much on the same page for once, led by *checks notes* an anti-GMO musician.

Streaming services can choose to carry whoever they want. You can join the discussion at the adult table when you stop pretending you don't understand that.
 

Back
Top Bottom