Cont: Corona Virus Conspiracy Theories Part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
That CBS is also corrupt, with or without a drug pusher sitting on their Board.
So the other MSM would be corrupt without a drug pusher on their Board, too, presumably.

So why does it matter if a drug pusher is on their Board? They'd be corrupt like CBS presumably is.
 
No body said that, but you keep harping as if otherwise were the case

(after you were corrected)
And it is "nobody". "no body" merely means the corpse is missing.

Jeez. How did we all end up teaching remedial grammar?

Tell me, bubba, have you ever used left handed toilet paper?
 
And it is "nobody". "no body" merely means the corpse is missing.

Jeez. How did we all end up teaching remedial grammar?

Tell me, bubba, have you ever used left handed toilet paper?

Yes, to wipe his mouth after spewing bull crap.
 
No body said that, but you keep harping as if otherwise were the case

(after you were corrected)
And it is "nobody". "no body" merely means the corpse is missing.

Jeez. How did we all end up teaching remedial grammar?

Tell me, bubba, have you ever used left handed toilet paper?

Now the chap who thought this up was shot down in the boardroom, but then an engineer on the shop floor said we can flip the rollers end for end at pretty much zero cost and have the tissue wrinkles going the other way.

And so it is that the 10% lefthanders pay twice as much for TP as the other 90% of us righthanders. And this has been going on since the 1950s. How much profit they must have gouged over those decades from all the lefthanders. Same process but twice the price? Wow. That is big loot.
 
Now the chap who thought this up was shot down in the boardroom, but then an engineer on the shop floor said we can flip the rollers end for end at pretty much zero cost and have the tissue wrinkles going the other way.

And so it is that the 10% lefthanders pay twice as much for TP as the other 90% of us righthanders. And this has been going on since the 1950s. How much profit they must have gouged over those decades from all the lefthanders. Same process but twice the price? Wow. That is big loot.

I have it on good authority that Big Toilet Paper has representatives on the boards of every media outlet.
 
No body said that, but you keep harping as if otherwise were the case

(after you were corrected)
And it is "nobody". "no body" merely means the corpse is missing.

Jeez. How did we all end up teaching remedial grammar?

Tell me, bubba, have you ever used left handed toilet paper?

Now the chap who thought this up was shot down in the boardroom, but then an engineer on the shop floor said we can flip the rollers end for end at pretty much zero cost and have the tissue wrinkles going the other way.

And so it is that the 10% lefthanders pay twice as much for TP as the other 90% of us righthanders. And this has been going on since the 1950s. How much profit they must have gouged over those decades from all the lefthanders. Same process but twice the price? Wow. That is big loot.
Go to whatever your local supermarket may be and check out the prices on TP. Make careful note of the price variations. Those that are double the price of the rest are the lefthanded ones.
 
I have it on good authority that Big Toilet Paper has representatives on the boards of every media outlet.
Dunno. If 10% of your customers pay twice the price, suddenly your sales are at 110%. Good result for any sales exec, no? That is how it works in the corporate world.
 
VAERS stats with reasonably inferred reporting rates indicate deaths in the tens or even hundreds of thousands, injuries in the millions, and moderate to severe adverse events in the tens of millions.
Still waiting for the evidence for this claim, Tippit.

Remember the process is:

1. Identify an adverse event with what appears to be a suspiciously high frequency (e.g. unexplained death in otherwise healthy people with no co-morbidities)

2. Establish, using historical data, what the expected frequency for this event is in the population(s) concerned

3. Show that (1) is significantly higher than (2)

4. Show that the increase identified in (3) is correlated with the vaccine rollout

Medical professionals have, so far as I'm aware, used this process to identify just one such adverse event, but you must be aware of many more (dozens, I would think) to make this claim. So please point us to the evidence for at least one of them.
 
Now the chap who thought this up was shot down in the boardroom, but then an engineer on the shop floor said we can flip the rollers end for end at pretty much zero cost and have the tissue wrinkles going the other way.

And so it is that the 10% lefthanders pay twice as much for TP as the other 90% of us righthanders. And this has been going on since the 1950s. How much profit they must have gouged over those decades from all the lefthanders. Same process but twice the price? Wow. That is big loot.

Aha! But only sheeple fall for this. The ones who DO THEIR OWN RESEARCH know that all you have to do is buy the cheaper right hand toilet paper and rewind it backwards on a different roller. The smartest survivalists, fearing what would happen if Big Pooper caught on, have saved closets full of empty rollers just in case.
 
Aha! But only sheeple fall for this. The ones who DO THEIR OWN RESEARCH know that all you have to do is buy the cheaper right hand toilet paper and rewind it backwards on a different roller. The smartest survivalists, fearing what would happen if Big Pooper caught on, have saved closets full of empty rollers just in case.
Wait, are they trying to get into the closet or out of it? And where is Narnia in either case?
 
So the other MSM would be corrupt without a drug pusher on their Board, too, presumably.



So why does it matter if a drug pusher is on their Board? They'd be corrupt like CBS presumably is.
Having pushers on their Boards or not, under-reporting/coddling big pharma/tobacco/oil/etc defines being corrupt, doesn't it?...(when your job is straight reporting, even if you are not doing investigative journalism)

Sent from my moto g(7) power using Tapatalk
 
Still waiting for the evidence for this claim, Tippit.

Remember the process is:

1. Identify an adverse event with what appears to be a suspiciously high frequency (e.g. unexplained death in otherwise healthy people with no co-morbidities)

2. Establish, using historical data, what the expected frequency for this event is in the population(s) concerned

3. Show that (1) is significantly higher than (2)

4. Show that the increase identified in (3) is correlated with the vaccine rollout

Medical professionals have, so far as I'm aware, used this process to identify just one such adverse event, but you must be aware of many more (dozens, I would think) to make this claim. So please point us to the evidence for at least one of them.

Well, we went from virtually no "vaccine"-associated deaths to 22,193 "vaccine"-associated deaths to date, which obviously correlates with the largest rollout of "vaccines" in history. Your apparent claim is that of all of these deaths, where health professionals or others have sought to go through the trouble to do the paperwork required for a VAERS report after the death of their patient or loved one, exactly one of them (or one type of adverse event, I'm not sure what you meant) died. I'm not sure of the naivety or gullibility required to believe this, but lets just say it goes well beyond confirmation bias. And then there is the basic arithmetic associated with the reporting rate, which indicates that the vaccine-associated deaths are a multiple, perhaps even a large multiple of 22,193 - but, not to worry, none of these deaths were vaccine-caused, because tens and possibly hundreds of thousands of people die in proximity to taking vaccines all the time I guess, historically. Or something.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom