• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: Corona Virus Conspiracy Theories Part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
Do, please, put a cloth mask on and exhale some chunks of food, whilst videoing this. Report whether the mask prevents those chunks from leaving your mouth. Once you've stopped choking, clean yourself up and post the video.

I would think that if Tippit's (with two i's) lungs can contain the things he describes then COVID 19 may indeed uniquely be a non-issue for him. Ascribing his singular lung workings to the general population would be a non-starter though.
 
Except they’re not, as I described above. Using a bad analogy throwing around terms like RNA and DNA to describe how non-GMO smallpox vaccine elicits an immune response doesn’t account for the fact that the Covid experimental gene therapies are GMO, and the Smallpox vaccines aren’t.


Throwing around terms like “GMO” is probably not a good idea when you don’t know what all the letters stand for.
 
Great. Surgeons and surgical nurses and anesthetists and whatever do not need masks.

What fun.

That would be the dumbest conclusion you could possibly make. The correct conclusion, is that if they suspect viral contagion, they need more than an ASTM 3 surgical mask.
 
That would be the dumbest conclusion you could possibly make. The correct conclusion, is that if they suspect viral contagion, they need more than an ASTM 3 surgical mask.
Nope. Sans COVID they are performing an appendectomy. You think masks are useless. Having been under the knife a few times, I would be screaming at high volume if the team were not all masked up in scrubs. Long before COVID. OTOH, you claim that it is unnecessary. Thus surgery can be carried out in sweat pants by a surgeon not wearing gloves. That is where you are going. Somehow, I doubt you would be happy with that.
 
The CEO of Bayer debunked by a mere claim of an anonymous masked rat. Impressive.
Nope, debunked by post#1805, and by post#1801, and over and over and OVAH!

You'd think the smartest person I'm likely to encounter, and also employed in science would remember.
 
Nope. Sans COVID they are performing an appendectomy. You think masks are useless. Having been under the knife a few times, I would be screaming at high volume if the team were not all masked up in scrubs. Long before COVID. OTOH, you claim that it is unnecessary. Thus surgery can be carried out in sweat pants by a surgeon not wearing gloves. That is where you are going. Somehow, I doubt you would be happy with that.

You have a serious reading comprehension problem. I think surgical masks are useless to prevent viral infections, which means cloth masks are less than useless, which is what the linked study confirms. Surgical masks are useful for surgery without risk of viral contagion.
 
Whether the experimental gene therapies really qualify as experimental gene therapies, depends on your definition of gene therapy. If it means altering the genes of the patient, then they aren't (presumably). If it means altering the RNA used in the therapy, to produce GMO spike proteins, then they are.

Clearly, according to the second definition, they are, and this is an important distinction from a health risk perspective, just as is the distinction between eating GMO tomatoes spliced with cockroach genes versus non-GMO tomatoes. These aren't your grandfather's polio vaccines.

What we do know, is that all of the spike proteins, be they from wild viruses or "vaccines" are cytotoxic, regardless of whether they're GMO.
 
No, I did not thank you, I asked you to prove it, and you declined with your usual snark.
No gaslighting, Bubba, that's naughty.
If you want to continue with this claim, you need to show the evidence, or it will simply be dismissed again.
Up to you.


Really?
Sorry, I thought you thanked me. I also thought I recalled "showing the evidence".


Since some here sometimes seem to sound like they accept MSM reporting on covid and the injections as wholly reliable....here is "the evidence" again.` Let me know if you think the MSM covers big pharma fairly and responsibly.

Actual journalism matters in the age of covid, mandatory/coerced injections, and claims of dissenting doctors and scientists being censored.

According to a 2009 study by Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, with the exception of CBS every major media outlet in the United States shares at least one board member with at least one drug company. Let me put it in perspective for you, these board members wake up, they go to a meeting at Merck or Pfizer, and then they have their driver take them over to a meeting with NBC to decide what kind of programming that network is going to air.

For those board members who aren’t pulling double duty with a media conglomerate and a big drug company, they still understand that they can’t be honest and objective about big pharma because big pharma pays their bills. Drug companies spend about $5 billion a year on advertising with these corporate media outlets, so when Pfizer or Merck or Eli Lilly, or any of the drug companies, kill or cripple Americans with defective drugs, do you really think these board members are going to allow their story to be told on the air?

It can take anywhere from three days to a full week before the media reports on a drug or a medical device recall, if they report at all. In the case of Invokana it took 32 days before television outlets reported a single story involving an FDA warning about the potential problems with the product. The FDA began warning about the extreme dangers of Cook IVC filters as early as 2010 and it took about five years, five years, before television media started reporting that to the public.

It’s worth pointing out that in these instances it was only through non-corporate independent media outlets that these stories were told at all. It was the outlets who weren’t being forced, they weren’t being forced to remain silent about the drug industry. You can replace IVC or Invokana with any other drug or product and the story is all the same. Stryker hip implants, C8, Vioxx, RoundUp, Xarelto, talcum powder, they’re all the same thing.

The corporate media doesn’t care about these stories because they either share board members with these companies, or because they want those companies to keep throwing dollars their way in big advertising dollars. These gigantic media corporations aren’t going to do anything to threaten their relationship with big advertisers.


https://trofire.com/2017/04/11/big-pharma-owns-corporate-media-americans-waking-fighting-back/
 
Really?
Sorry, I thought you thanked me. I also thought I recalled "showing the evidence".


Since some here sometimes seem to sound like they accept MSM reporting on covid and the injections as wholly reliable....here is "the evidence" again.` Let me know if you think the MSM covers big pharma fairly and responsibly.

Actual journalism matters in the age of covid, mandatory/coerced injections, and claims of dissenting doctors and scientists being censored.
What, then, should we conclude about a story about drugs that is substantially the same on CBS as well as most/all other media?
 
What, then, should we conclude about a story about drugs that is substantially the same on CBS as well as most/all other media?



That CBS is also corrupt, with or without a drug pusher sitting on their Board.


The history of MSM not reporting on big pharma's sins is known
 
Last edited:
I said:
The history of MSM not reporting on big pharma's sins is known.



correction


Delaying/under-reporting pharma's sins is more accurate. (although I wouldn't be surprised if "not reporting" applies in some cases).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom