The Jan. 6 Investigation

Status
Not open for further replies.
They'll have to, if law and order mean anything at all.

They don't. Law and Order needs facts to make sense and we are in a post facts world.

Bannon will defy the subpoena and probably get away with. Trump will defy the subpoena and definitely get away with it if they try to subpoena him.

We are not going to get justice for Jan 6 or anything thing else that happened under Trump.
 
I'm on the fence as to how many beers it would take for this one...but I bet she is a minx.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/na...itol-riot-pennsylvania-charges-riley-williams

I don't follow.

Remember how, when you were a teenager, there was always that one guy in the group who thought it was really sophisticated to point to a passing girl and say something like "yeah, I'd do her- if I had enough beers first," and then think him being the only one laughing at his wit was enough to validate it? Yeah- it's like that.

And the ironic thing is that "angsty edgelord teenager" is quite possibly the real reason the young lady in the story did what she did. So she and Warp probably have at least that much in common.
 
Bannon's announced he's just going to not listen to the subpoena, furthering the Republican strategy of "Okay, make me."

He is citing Trump orders as his justification.
In other words the Leadership Principal: The will of the Furhrur, excuse me ,Leader is the surpreme law of the land. Where have we heard that before?

The Dems cannot afford to back down. Send out US Marshalls to arrest his butt.
 
He is talking about the woman who stole Pelosi's laptop.
Edited by zooterkin: 
<SNIP>
Edited for rule 12.

don't be fooled, these guys all want to be punished by Pelosi
 
Last edited by a moderator:
He is citing Trump orders as his justification.
In other words the Leadership Principal: The will of the Furhrur, excuse me ,Leader is the surpreme law of the land. Where have we heard that before?

The Dems cannot afford to back down. Send out US Marshalls to arrest his butt.

I agree, and it's more of a matter of respect than anything at that point. A former president's crony, well disavowed crony really, defying a congressional subpoena on his authority and being allowed to get away with that is complete disrespect for the rule of law. They can't let that go unchecked, especially to a guy like Steve Bannon.

But they have a really poor track record of accountability, which is why Steve Bannon feels empowered to do that. That is what needs to end.
 
He is talking about the woman who stole Pelosi's laptop.
Edited by zooterkin: 
<SNIP>
Edited for rule 12.


Edited by xjx388: 
Response to moderated content


Below, Riley Williams' mug shot. She's no glamour girl but she seems reasonably attractive. Physically anyway. The kind of person she appears to be is NOT attractive.
 

Attachments

  • Riley Williams.jpg
    Riley Williams.jpg
    44.1 KB · Views: 12
Last edited by a moderator:
You know, this is starting to make me wonder. Why did they have to shoot and kill Ashli Babbit? I mean, no physical confrontation of this unarmed lady, no warning shot (is that even a thing?), no Taser...nothing? Just how great of a threat was she?

https://www.foxnews.com/us/documents-ashli-babbitt-death-foia-capitol-police

I'm not saying I agree with the article on all (or even most) points, but food for thought.
 
Last edited:
It doesn't surprise me that Judicial Watch would report it skewed this way:

MediaBias/Fact Check rates JW:

Overall, we rate Judicial Watch Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories, and an abysmal fact check record.

Reasoning: Conspiracy, Propaganda, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

Founded in 1994 by Larry Klayman, Judicial Watch (JW) is an American conservative activist group that files Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits to investigate government officials’ alleged misconduct. They primarily target Democrats such as the Clinton’s, Obama, and climate scientists as they label climate science “fraud science.” Judicial Watch has made numerous false and unsubstantiated claims, with a “vast majority” of their lawsuits dismissed. They describe themselves as “a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, promotes transparency, accountability, and integrity in government, politics and the law.” The current President of JW is Tom Fitton.

Analysis / Bias
Judicial Watch reports news on their website using strong emotional language that is usually pro-right or anti-left. Common topics covered are anti-immigration, in which they highlight crimes committed by illegal immigrants such as this: Busy Month for Illegal Immigrants Committing Heinous Crimes or dedicating an entire website to exposing former President Obama’s alleged IRS scandal. They have also promoted debunked conspiracy theories such as this. Further, the founder of JW, Larry Klayman, recently promoted the conspiracy that the Clintons were killing people. In general, the majority of content and story selection is anti-left.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/judicial-watch/


Nuff said on the credibility of this 'report'. The fact is that Ashli Babbitt was engaging in illegal activity having broken through the window with a mob behind that was just steps away from the House Chamber doors. They were were calling to hang Mike Pence and specifically looking for Nancy Pelosi. Unluckily for her, Babbitt was the first coming through the window. Lt. Byrd warned them to stop and they didn't. There is no one to blame but Ashli Babbitt and this turning her into a martyr by Trump and his ilk is just another example of their sick and twisted determination to turn her into a martyr.
 
The fact is that Ashli Babbitt was engaging in illegal activity having broken through the window with a mob behind that was just steps away from the House Chamber doors. They were were calling to hang Mike Pence and specifically looking for Nancy Pelosi. Unluckily for her, Babbitt was the first coming through the window. Lt. Byrd warned them to stop and they didn't. There is no one to blame but Ashli Babbitt and this turning her into a martyr by Trump and his ilk is just another example of their sick and twisted determination to turn her into a martyr.

Were there any other options besides deadly force? Seems obvious that there were.

As I say, I am not siding with the "report"...but I am opening my eyes to the simple fact that there were other alternatives to deadly force, certainly.

Deadly force should be the last choice for an officer, not the first. Or do you disagree?
 
Last edited:
Were there any other options besides deadly force? Seems obvious that there were.

As I say, I am not siding with the "report"...but I am opening my eyes to the simple fact that there were other alternatives to deadly force, certainly.

Deadly force should be the last choice for an officer, not the first. Or do you disagree?

would you say the same thing about a Home Invasion ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom