turingtest
Mistral, mistral wind...
Darwin described a theory of evolution by natural selection. He did not describe evolution by God changing His mind and he did not describe a distinct form of evolution purely for humans. In fact he rather avoided stating directly that his theory also encompassed humans as he recognised that would have been troubling to some readers.
Once again, declaring that an ancient text contains passages which can be reinterpreted as vague poetic allusions to modern science is not impressive.
I've taken the liberty of highlighting what you had already emphasized, in the hope that perhaps heydarian will see the problem. He appears to think that the entirety of the theory of evolution is "living things change over time," when it's more accurately a description of the mechanism behind that tritely obvious observation. A holy book that makes humans a goal of change certainly can't be said to anticipate a theory that it actually contradicts in that theory's most basic feature- that the change, for any life, including humans, is not driven by any normative engine.