When did I do that? When I apologized for making an assumption?
...that it was my fault in the end, yes.
Oh? If you have considered my points, why do you disagree with the political reasons for the adding of the "God" phrases?
I don't disagree that there were political reasons, I am saying that the reasons weren't all political: They feared the god-less Reds, so they put a religious reference in.
Why do you not answer my question about joking not being the only non-literal rhetorical device?
I did:
I haven't said anything to that effect.
Which, of course, you disagreed with. That you disagree with me is not the same as me not answering the question.
What supernatural being?
Any supernatural being.
A direct reference to an ambiguously defined "supernatural being"? Still not sure what you're talking about, but do you understand the context under which these decisions were made, especially given the atmosphere of the time?
Yes, I do.
Finish the statement: "...for political reasons."
Not merely for political reasons. Politics is people, and people were very worried about the godless Commie Bastards. They didn't put in "capitalist", did they? They didn't put in "freedom", did they?
It was still wrong, but it was not for the purpose of adding "God" to the US government.
That's where we disagree.
A reply is not necessarily an answer.
Indeed. I have, however, answered your question.