I don't think space is expanding.

Status
Not open for further replies.
hecd2 said:
I doubt it.
Click to expand...

Once I had the basic structure of the simulation, I tried adding "the expansion of time", by adjusting the clock rate of the distant observer.

It got to be a strange looking simulation where the photon was moving to two different clocks.

So I just gave the photon it's own clock with an adjusted rate based on distance, and the observer's clocks are stationary and synced.

That fixes the least time principle violation too.
 
theprestige said:
He's still trying to come up with a scheme that replaces his previous scheme.
Click to expand...

I believe that you are correct.

Whenever 'Mike Helland' runs the course of one bit of nonsense, then he simply starts a course of new nonsense in order to show that he has corrected his previous bit of nonsense.

And what is barely interesting and what is always consistent, is that in all cases the results are just more worthless nonsense regardless of whatever course of nonsense that he happens to follow at any given moment.
 
Crossbow said:
I believe that you are correct.

Whenever 'Mike Helland' runs the course of one bit of nonsense, then he simply starts a course of new nonsense in order to show that he has corrected his previous bit of nonsense.

And what is barely interesting and what is always consistent, is that in all cases the results are just more worthless nonsense regardless of whatever course of nonsense that he happens to follow at any given moment.
Click to expand...

Yeah, well, that's cosmology for you.

Since this thread started, the Hubble tension has gotten worse, and some 120 new ideas about dark energy and its different modes and dynamics have been put on arxiv.

Also, Ziggurat showed me how to properly model the expansion of space (Thanks!) and hecd2 showed me how to properly convert supernovae data to distances I can compare with my models (Thanks!)

Now I have a simple z-distance relation that fits the empirical evidence with no other parameters z=HD2 +2HD.

It has been shown to me, in a variety of ways, that a slow photon does not reflect properly. Now I know that instead of the photon slowing down, it remains in c, but it has it's own clock that slows down with distance by 1/(1+z), or 1/(1+HD)2.

All in all, I think its been a pretty successful endeavor. But the real prize is the friends we made along the way.
 
Mike Helland said:
Once I had the basic structure of the simulation, I tried adding "the expansion of time", by adjusting the clock rate of the distant observer.

It got to be a strange looking simulation where the photon was moving to two different clocks.
Click to expand...
That's a sure sign that you had some basic misunderstanding or inconsistency built right into your program.

So I just gave the photon it's own clock with an adjusted rate based on distance, and the observer's clocks are stationary and synced.

That fixes the least time principle violation too.
Click to expand...
Not so fast, Kemosabe. You will have to produce a coherent description of idea no 7, so that we can assess whether it "fixes the least time principle violation". All of your claims of this nature so far have been wrong.
It has been shown to me, in a variety of ways, that a slow photon does not reflect properly. Now I know that instead of the photon slowing down, it remains in c, but it has it's own clock that slows down with distance by 1/(1+z), or 1/(1+HD)2
Click to expand...
This I am afraid is incoherent babble. You'll have to describe this more clearly.
 
Writing programs to make animated cartoons is one thing. Mike is very good at that.

Drawing diagrams that accurately describe an internally-consistent mathematical model is something else entirely.

All Mike is doing is drawing pictures of what he hopes a mathematical model would produce. If he actually had a mathematical model, the pictures would draw themselves.
 
Mike Helland said:
Yeah, well, that's cosmology for you.

Since this thread started, the Hubble tension has gotten worse, and some 120 new ideas about dark energy and its different modes and dynamics have been put on arxiv.

Also, Ziggurat showed me how to properly model the expansion of space (Thanks!) and hecd2 showed me how to properly convert supernovae data to distances I can compare with my models (Thanks!)

Now I have a simple z-distance relation that fits the empirical evidence with no other parameters z=HD2 +2HD.

It has been shown to me, in a variety of ways, that a slow photon does not reflect properly. Now I know that instead of the photon slowing down, it remains in c, but it has it's own clock that slows down with distance by 1/(1+z), or 1/(1+HD)2.

All in all, I think its been a pretty successful endeavor. But the real prize is the friends we made along the way.
Click to expand...

It would be much better for all concerned if you were to stop the constant demonstrations of your ignorance and if you were to stop acting nice.
 
Mike Helland said:
It has been shown to me, in a variety of ways, that a slow photon does not reflect properly. Now I know that instead of the photon slowing down, it remains in c, but it has it's own clock that slows down with distance by 1/(1+z), or 1/(1+HD)2.
Click to expand...

That doesn't actually make any sense.
 
Mike Helland said:
It was a pretty good idea to look at it from the opposite direction though.
Click to expand...

Such a good idea that people did look at it from the other direction right away, and tell you that it looked wrong and couldn't work.

Such a good idea that they told you to look at it from the other direction yourself, and see for yourself that it couldn't work.

Such a good idea that one wonders why you didn't think of it yourself, and look at it from all directions and see that it didn't work before posting it here. Especially given that every single proposal you've posted here so far hasn't passed even a cursory examination. One would expect that you'd have learned from experience by now, and looked at these things yourself before posting them. Just to save yourself some embarassment.

Is it the embarassment itself you're going for?
 
Ziggurat said:
Your ignorance knows no bounds.

The photon cannot have its own clock.
Click to expand...

It does in my hypothesis.

A light-like path in spacetime is equal parts time and space.

The photon moves forward in time. That's pretty obvious from the light cone. It doesn't stay at t=0.
 
Ziggurat said:
Your hypothesis is self-contradictory where it is not completely incoherent.
Click to expand...

It was falsified by observation, the reflection off HST's mirror.

Now I've shown that it is not.

The self contradictory hypothesis was that time doesn't flow at the same rate across all distances. That was a failed route, but it inspired the solution to the decelerating photon hypothesis's reflection problem.
 
Ziggurat said:
No, Mike. You haven't.
Click to expand...

qed.gif


https://mikehelland.github.io/hubbles-law/other/reflection_nm.htm
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom