Emily's Cat
Rarely prone to hissy-fits
You can't prove the leftist anti-religion NGO drivers don't have an opinion about that.
It depends, what do you actually mean by "prove"? And how can you know for sure if it's really "proof" at all?
You can't prove the leftist anti-religion NGO drivers don't have an opinion about that.
I'm simply stating what seem to me to be obvious observations based on this thread and some google searches. I have no hypothesis about any kind of fancy behind-the-scenes deals that would qualify as a conspiracy theory.
They are male.Do you know why transmen can become pregnant? Because they are FEMALE and are NOT MALE. And because sex actually is quite important.
In a strange way I think Collin has a point. Not as a 'conspiracy', but I think that the current toxic trans activism is a type of cult, not all of the key players are transgender, and they are using people who are transgender for their own interests. Bret Weinstein said something similar in one of the videos I linked to a while back - that very few transgender people he knew were actually interested in 're-writing the rules of logic' or 'telling biologists what to think' (as TRAs are). Rather, transgender people are being used as an excuse for bullying and to gain the power to hard code preferred ideologies into society.
They are male.
Being able to become pregnant doesn't automatically mean they are female.
Have you come across a defintion of "female" which wouldn't put pregnant people in that category?Being able to become pregnant doesn't automatically mean they are female.
Being able to become pregnant doesn't automatically mean they are female.
Being able to become pregnant doesn't automatically mean they are female.
I registered online and clicked a box saying I was female. When I came to collect my race number from the Trinity Sports Centre, the lady there said “So you’re male?” as she went to make an adjustment to her spreadsheet. In a slightly triggered tone I said “No, I am female”, and that solved the matter.
Have you come across a defintion of "female" which wouldn't put pregnant people in that category?
I think you'll find it does, in the real world out there as opposed to topsy-turvy TRA la-la land.
Then what does?
Define female in a meaningful way that isn't pure, arbitrary self-determination.
Also... for the "nobody's just going to pretend to be trans just to compete in sports" side of this ****-show...
“I just clicked a box saying I was female” – male Trinity student comes 2nd in women’s race
I never claimed nobody would do it, only that it wouldn't happen often enough to be a big issue.Also... for the "nobody's just going to pretend to be trans just to compete in sports" side of this ****-show...
“I just clicked a box saying I was female” – male Trinity student comes 2nd in women’s race
For scientific and medical purposes, the ability to become pregnant is a distinction. But for all other matters, I don't see biology as that relevant when it comes to sex.Then what does?
Define female in a meaningful way that isn't pure, arbitrary self-determination.
For scientific and medical purposes, the ability to become pregnant is a distinction. But for all other matters, I don't see biology as that relevant when it comes to sex.
Like the census discussion earlier, I would put my sex as female, as I always do when I am given the option. Likewise a transgender man would put male.
They are male.
Being able to become pregnant doesn't automatically mean they are female.
I never claimed nobody would do it, only that it wouldn't happen often enough to be a big issue.
It's a big issue to the other competitors!
But hey, they're just females they don't matter, right?
They are male.
Being able to become pregnant doesn't automatically mean they are female.
There needs to be words for the real and important biological distinction.