• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Cont: [ED] Discussion: Trans Women are not Women (Part 5)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm fond of mythology, and I always loved Eris's stunning effectiveness with such a little gesture...

But I confess that I am not following you with this analogy. I'm missing a few steps needed to connect it to this interaction. Care to elaborate?

Me neither. The only place I've heard of the golden apple was on the TV show Hercules starring Kevin Sorbo. And I gather that was quite different from the original legend.
 
I will not get bogged down in definitions of what a woman is
{...}
I don't really care if it is or isn't scientifically accurate to call myself female

Here's what I don't understand. Even if you don't care about defining your terms or whether your claims are scientifically accurate or not, surely you must have known that making such claims here would get them scrutinized on exactly those grounds and rejected when you'd fail to support them? I'm not saying that you have to care about definitions or scientific accuracy, but then why, out of all places on the internet, would you choose to come make them here - one of the few places on the internet where you know they would get scrutinized, and ultimately rejected, on those grounds?
 
Cervical smears no, since some forms of vaginoplasty create a cervix. WNBA no, since we should have the right to play sports equally with our own gender. A private club on the other hand can discriminate, as SuburbanTurkey pointed out.


You should have the right to play sports equally with your own sex. That is an absolute red line and while there is a lot of nonsense going on at the moment the nonsense will not prevail.

If there are post-op transwomen who are actually at risk of cervical cancer then of course they should be included in cervical smear clinics. Please provide evidence that such people actually exist. A structure created by plastic surgery out of male tissue is not a cervix and I require evidence that such a structure is susceptible to the type of cancers that can be diagnosed using the cervical smear technique.

Women are not here to cosset you in your delusions. Use the spaces you're entitled to, enter the sports you're entitled to enter by your sex. If other men do anything to make this difficult for you, take it up with them. Don't expect women to throw themselves under your feet as your personal doormat.
 
Do you feel that females in a women's locker room would have the right to discriminate against cismen?



Do you believe that a cisman should have the right to undress and expose himself in front of young women?

Yes to the first and no to the second. Cisgender men are men and shouldn't be allowed in women only spaces if we don't want them in there. Same goes with transgender men as well since they are men as well.

Sent from my moto g(7) using Tapatalk
 
As a "physically untransitioned transgender woman" based on your criteria here, if a cisgender woman wanted to kick me out of such a place, she shouldn't be allowed to as I have the right to be in there as a woman.

In women's locker rooms and spas I've been in I try to keep to myself and don't get fully naked around anybody. But regardless if I did or not, it shouldn't be allowed for her to discriminate against me based on what genitals I have.

She is free to go elsewhere if she wants.


You are not a woman. This is what we are trying to explain to you. You are stating that you have rights that you simply do not have, or that your mates have bullied and gaslighted organisations into caving in and giving you.

The entire point of male and female locker rooms is to discriminate between (not against) people on the basis of what genitalia they have. You are not being discriminated against, you are correctly being discriminated into your correct sex-class to change with people who are of the same sex as you are. So quit with the entitlement, the bullying and the gaslighting. Telling women to get out of their own spaces because you want to dress up and play at being a woman is an absolute tell for male entitlement, don't ever imagine you have a "woman's mind".
 
Last edited:
We have to deal with sex-based bias and the risk of dangerous men as well. And even sex-based conditioning, since much of my childhood and teen years were spent rejecting male conditioning since I felt it didn't apply to me. And embracing current female conditioning due to living fully as a woman.

We are not as different from you as you may think. We have similar barriers and sex-segregated spaces are important just as much for us.

Sent from my moto g(7) using Tapatalk

You do not have to deal with sex-based bias at all. For example, by definition, you have no risk of pregnancy. The many female fetuses aborted, babies killed and girls subjected to female genital mutilation could not escape their fate by not identifying as female. Moreover, TW will never be seen as a subset of women (the way say- tall women are) because of that reproductive potential. Males will always figure out the difference - there is rather strong selection (putting it mildly) to do so.
 
Last edited:
Do you have a link for this?

As far as I can tell, a neocervix created for aesthetics could potentially become cancerous, but it wouldn't be cervical cancer. That is, it wouldn't be the same squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma that a cervix is subject to. Screenings may still be appropriate, but I'm not sure that a gynecologist would be the one who does it. Especially depending on the type of vaginoplasty performed. If it were created from a bowel, for example, it would be a different type of cancer, and I don't know that a standard gynecological cervical screening would even test for the right things.


That's what I thought. Any screening that might be appropriate would need a different technique from cervical smears used on people who actually have cervixes. So no, they don't get to go to the cervical smear clinic.
 
:rolleyes: That person is free to say whatever ridiculous hateful stuff they want to.

I would like to be able to take their behavior and their frankly misogynistic commentary into consideration and refuse them admittance to my presence when I am vulnerable.

I agree that that specific person should not be allowed in women's spaces.
 
Me neither. The only place I've heard of the golden apple was on the TV show Hercules starring Kevin Sorbo. And I gather that was quite different from the original legend.


I've just finished watching Das Rheingold from the Met. Are these Idun's apples of eternal youth that the Aesir eat?
 
Here's what I don't understand. Even if you don't care about defining your terms or whether your claims are scientifically accurate or not, surely you must have known that making such claims here would get them scrutinized on exactly those grounds and rejected when you'd fail to support them? I'm not saying that you have to care about definitions or scientific accuracy, but then why, out of all places on the internet, would you choose to come make them here - one of the few places on the internet where you know they would get scrutinized, and ultimately rejected, on those grounds?

What I don't understand is why anyone committed to the cause of transsexuality wouldn't care what science - biology, psychology - has to say about the subject? If we drop science from the conversation, what's left? Transwomen are women because witchcraft?
 
What I don't understand is why anyone committed to the cause of transsexuality wouldn't care what science - biology, psychology - has to say about the subject? If we drop science from the conversation, what's left? Transwomen are women because witchcraft?

Ultimately few people care about scientific accuracy or precise definitions. We're a minority on that in the population at large. Which is why I don't understand why Boudicca would specifically come here, one of the few places on the internet where people do scrutinize claims on their scientific accuracy and logical consistency, to make claims when there are tons and tons of alternatives available where she can make such claims all day long without them ever getting scrutinized on these grounds.

It's like joining a soccer team while not caring for the rules of soccer. Sure, nobody is required to care about the rules of soccer and few people actually do, but then why go join a soccer team? Surely such person should know that this would cause problems with the rest of the team, the fans, and especially the referee of the game.
 
What I don't understand is why anyone committed to the cause of transsexuality wouldn't care what science - biology, psychology - has to say about the subject? If we drop science from the conversation, what's left? Transwomen are women because witchcraft?

Of course we don't drop science! We drop ideology. What's left? Rejecting unanswerable questions, and just sticking to the truth -- trans women are people.
 
Of course we don't drop science! We drop ideology. What's left? Rejecting unanswerable questions, and just sticking to the truth -- trans women are people.

"Transwomen are people" is an ideological position. Societies picking and choosing who are the people and who are not is always an ideological game.
 
If Boudicca has been misled by ideology, what is wrong about what she believes?

According to you, what is the right way for Boudicca to think about her sex and gender?

She believes, as does Rolfe, that "being a man" and "being a woman" are essential forms. Boudicca is someone who was born male, and for some unknown reason feels ineluctably that he should be female. That doesn't give him extra inalienable rights. It may however give him extra liberties in certain jurisdictions, depending on the consensus of civil society. Any movement that prevents people from freely weighing whether or not to sustain the consensus on specific issues, is detrimental to democracy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom