Cont: Trump et al continued “2020 election” conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
There is an interesting Twitter feed, called @FacebooksTop10, that posts the sources of the 10 top-performing link posts by U.S. Facebook pages every day, ranked by total interactions.

https://twitter.com/facebookstop10?lang=en

The pinned tweet links to a document explaining exactly what the data does (and doesn't) capture.
Still, the tweets shows how ridiculous the claims are that there is a war on right wing voices on Social Media.

The last three posted days:
Dec 18th:
1. Fox News
2. Franklin Graham
3. Ben Shapiro
4. NPR
5. Dan Bongino
6. Ben Shapiro
7. Occupy Democrats
8. ComicBook .com
9. CNN
10. Fox News

Dec 17th:
1. Dan Bongino
2. Donald J. Trump
3. Dan Bongino
4. Donald J. Trump
5. Donald Trump For President
6. Dan Bongino
7. Dan Bongino
8. Dan Bongino
9. Fox News
10. Jay Sekulow

Dec 16th:
1. Donald J. Trump
2. Dinesh D'Souza
3. NPR
4. Dan Bongino
5. Dios Es Bueno
6. Mark Levin
7. LeBron James
8. Dinesh D'Souza
9. Dan Bongino
10. Franklin Graham

See a trend?
 
Bubba said:
And yes, there are any number of cases where a double standard is the law. I just saw one reported today, where two sources, one conservative and one progressive, posted the exact same item on Twitter or FB. Only the conservative one got removed.
Click to expand...

And in contrast, one plucky invetigator took the content of some of Trump's tweets, and posted them as if he had created them (ie. not just retweeting). He was was banned for content.

These platforms are not perfect.

Sources: https://twitter.com/SuspendThePres , https://www.forbes.com/sites/carlie...eets-for-glorifying-violence/?sh=6a28108c7e20
 
Last edited:
Firestone said:
There is an interesting Twitter feed, called @FacebooksTop10, that posts the sources of the 10 top-performing link posts by U.S. Facebook pages every day, ranked by total interactions.

https://twitter.com/facebookstop10?lang=en

The pinned tweet links to a document explaining exactly what the data does (and doesn't) capture.
Still, the tweets shows how ridiculous the claims are that there is a war on right wing voices on Social Media.

The last three posted days:
Dec 18th:
1. Fox News
2. Franklin Graham
3. Ben Shapiro
4. NPR
5. Dan Bongino
6. Ben Shapiro
7. Occupy Democrats
8. ComicBook .com
9. CNN
10. Fox News

Dec 17th:
1. Dan Bongino
2. Donald J. Trump
3. Dan Bongino
4. Donald J. Trump
5. Donald Trump For President
6. Dan Bongino
7. Dan Bongino
8. Dan Bongino
9. Fox News
10. Jay Sekulow

Dec 16th:
1. Donald J. Trump
2. Dinesh D'Souza
3. NPR
4. Dan Bongino
5. Dios Es Bueno
6. Mark Levin
7. LeBron James
8. Dinesh D'Souza
9. Dan Bongino
10. Franklin Graham

See a trend?
Click to expand...

At last check, Facebook literally changed their algorithms to outright favor Republicans with Zuckerberg's direct approval, among a bunch of other pointedly Republican favoring choices/policies instituted by Republicans in power at Facebook who were being pressured/threatened by other Republicans.

May as well just treat Bubba as being yet another right-winger working hard to create and maintain a situation where the right-wing propagandists monopolize social media as a major part of creating a controlled media situation (all while claiming that he opposes controlled media).
 
Worm said:
And in contrast, one plucky invetigator took the content of some of Trump's tweets, and posted them as if he had created them (ie. not just retweeting). He was was banned for content.

These platforms are not perfect.

Sources: https://twitter.com/SuspendThePres , https://www.forbes.com/sites/carlie...eets-for-glorifying-violence/?sh=6a28108c7e20
Click to expand...

Looks like News Corpse is claiming that their Twitter account was banned without Twitter giving reason as to why, for that matter.
 
Trump Retweeted

Senator Ron Johnson
@SenRonJohnson
We are holding an oversight hearing tomorrow to examine the irregularities in the 2020 election.
A large percentage of Americans simply don't think this was a legitimate election. That’s an unsustainable state of affairs for our country.
https://hsgac.senate.gov/examining-irregularities-in-the-2020-election

So galling.
The purveyors of Russian disinformation have been the Democrats.
Today's hearing was about restoring confidence in our election integrity.
We need to find out where there are problems and fix it moving forward.
Quote Tweet

CSPAN
@cspan
@SenRonJohnson: "You lied repeatedly in the press that I was spreading Russian disinformation...I told you to stop..."
@SenGaryPeters: "This is not about airing your grievances. I don't know what rabbit hole you're running down..."
Full video here: https://c-span.org/video/?507292-1/senate-hearing-election-security-administration

There is a lot more to the story of Wisconsin’s 2020 election and recount.
3 million people in our state voted properly.
But @JudgeTroupis testified that over 200,000 votes were not valid.

What happened in Nevada?
Here's the story from attorney @jbinnall who testified his whistleblower hotline never stopped ringing.
Yet the mainstream media and the Democrats accused him of making it all up, and the courts ignored his evidence.
https://hsgac.senate.gov/examining-irregularities-in-the-2020-election
 
Last edited:
See all these Trump tweets from lots of sources? Donny never posted them. Donny hasn't the inclination to do even very basic research let alone curation and editing of reports for retweeting. So this is all the work of someone else in his dwindling band of sieg-heiling lunatics. My impression is that Miller the reactionary Nazi propagandist is the prime instigator.

Donny the fat orange toad is obviously spending his day doing "presidential stuff", which now appears to consist mostly of a solid fried food diet, doomscrolling with a TV remote, and encouraging the last few jackboots in the White House to find ways to lob the last few grenades into the path of the incoming administration, whilst continuing to fleece his one-eyed single-neuron flock for millions of dollars. Even if his own personal staff now try to stop this.

So expect all sorts of shenanigans come 20-Jan...unless he has been arrested for something criminally sleazy in the meanwhile.
 
Bubba said:
Wait

Are you really unaware of the censoring by FB-Twitter-Google-youtube.?

There now are legal actions against them for that
Click to expand...

Were that only true. It aren't, of course. Facebook may be facing an anti-trust claim, but that's far from a suit over censorship.

Now that you know this, may we assume you won't continue to misrepresent this particular fact?
 
SezMe said:
Gee, I sure don't remember Dems claiming 2016 was "fake" and certainly not for four years. But maybe I don't listen to the "right" media.
Click to expand...

Strangely the only people crying “fake” at the 2016 election were Trump and his supporters.
 
Bubba said:
Wrong. You must not be aware of whats happened. They have waged wholesale war on conservative voices, since 2016 and ramped up to scorched earth in the few months before the election. No exaggeration. This is why there is the legal action coming.







The coming legal action is to rightly revoke their status because they are behaving like publishers, not neutral platforms.
Click to expand...

A) The platforms worked to stop lies and misinformation about a lethal, pandemic and stupid ass conspiracy theories about voter fraud.

B) The success rate for Trump backed legal actions does not indicate that the social media companies have much to worry about.
 
Bubba said:
The coming legal action is to rightly revoke their status because they are behaving like publishers, not neutral platforms.
Click to expand...

A common talking point that is quite incorrect. There are no legal stakes in whether someone is a "publisher" or a "platform" as far as liability for content that third parties submit and the service chooses to allow.

If you have the courage of your convictions enough to read a detailed treatment of the matter, I suggest this.

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/2...-section-230-communications-decency-act.shtml
 
Bubba said:
Its not even about that. You obviously dont know what is going on. Simply being a trump supporter, like Diamond and Silk is enough to get you blocked.

I think you guys would be surprised if you knew the extent of it.
Click to expand...

I'm going to bet that if someone posts a list of Trump supporters that have regular content that is not blocked, we'll be advised they aren't a REAL Trump supporter. Or something.
 
He means Section 230 liability protection. However, it's not a "status" of an organization. A particular piece of content is either protected or not. There's no "status" that online services have or can lose.

Rather like arguing that a conviction for libel means that someone lost their "free speech" status.
 
Captain_Swoop said:
Trump Retweeted

Kevin McCullough
@KMCRadio
DIIVIDED NATION:America is 50 states.
Minus the states in question Trump won 25, Biden won 16.
Those states house 2974 counties.
Even with the “votes in question” Trump won 2496, Biden on 477.

Trump won 84% of America, Biden “won” 16%.
#PickSixCheatBigJoeDid

Biden supporters seem to be really losing their minds at how angry they get when you tell them that Biden “won” only 16% of the counties. They get even angry about that, than the fact that they are all supporting a cheater—who’s ok with the cheating.
#PickSixCheatBigJoeDid
Click to expand...

That would matter if dirt voted.
 
gnome said:
I'm going to bet that if someone posts a list of Trump supporters that have regular content that is not blocked, we'll be advised they aren't a REAL Trump supporter. Or something.
Click to expand...

TTINOs (Trump Toadies In Name Only).
 
Trump Tweets

THE DEMOCRATS DUMPED HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF BALLOTS IN THE SWING STATES LATE IN THE EVENING. IT WAS A RIGGED ELECTION!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom