Is that important? I believe it was a Tim Pool video, if you must know.Where?
Is that important? I believe it was a Tim Pool video, if you must know.Where?
Good news, everyone.
They found fraud:
Postal worker recanted allegations of ballot tampering
He received $136K inbribesdonations from Republicans.
No, it's not that is "must be true", but you guys seem to be utterly ignorant about the claims that are being made. At the moment, I agree with you all that it's all quite preliminary and it could be that it all ends up being rebutted.If Giuliani says so, it must be true. The same Giuliani who said it was 'mathematically impossible' for Biden to overtake Trump in the vote counting? That one?
Jerry Nadler said:“I just, as a very experienced practical politician from New York, feel constrained to observe that in my experience in New York, paper ballots are extremely susceptible to fraud,” the veteran House Democrat said. “And at least with the old clunky voting machines that we have in New York, the deliberate fraud is way down compared to paper.”
Three unnamed people were told by some other unnamed people that the guy who says he didn't recant, recanted.... glad we are keeping to our standard of evidence.https://nypost.com/2020/11/11/usps-whistleblower-denies-wapo-claim-he-recanted-allegations/
"In a video posted Tuesday evening, Richard Hopkins, a United States Postal Service worker in the must-win swing state, denied taking back his statements when speaking to authorities.
“I’m here to say I did not recant my statements. That did not happen,” said Hopkins, 32."
Richard Hopkins, the Postal worker, has stated the WAPO should recant their article.
And it appears to be another example of fake news by the Washington Post. Now I'll just go ahead and let everyone know in advance that I'm not going to debate whether his allegations are true or false. I'm merely pointing out that you have been had by the WaPo. The evidence of a Postal worker recant is fake news. Why would they do that?
CNN said:A New Jersey judge invalidated a city council election and ordered a new one after allegations of voter fraud, according to a ruling issued Wednesday.
The May 12 election for Paterson's Third Ward city council was "rife with mail in vote procedural violations," Judge Ernest Caposela said in his ruling, though he left the decision on whether there was voter fraud to the criminal courts.
"It was the right ruling. That past election was fraught with fraud," Mayor Andre Sayegh told CNN. "The City will comply with the judge's decision and we created the Mayor's Election Awareness Team to preserve the value of the vote in Paterson."
Apologies Darat, I don't have ring binders of this stuff.
https://youtu.be/lysRM0q4ikM?t=39
That's Giuliani saying 50-60 poll watchers. I heard he had since upped that to 70, but I don't have a source of Giuliani saying it.
we have to see
No, it's not that is "must be true", but you guys seem to be utterly ignorant about the claims that are being made. At the moment, I agree with you all that it's all quite preliminary and it could be that it all ends up being rebutted.
https://nypost.com/2020/11/11/usps-whistleblower-denies-wapo-claim-he-recanted-allegations/
"In a video posted Tuesday evening, Richard Hopkins, a United States Postal Service worker in the must-win swing state, denied taking back his statements when speaking to authorities.
“I’m here to say I did not recant my statements. That did not happen,” said Hopkins, 32."
Richard Hopkins, the Postal worker, has stated the WAPO should recant their article.
And it appears to be another example of fake news by the Washington Post. Now I'll just go ahead and let everyone know in advance that I'm not going to debate whether his allegations are true or false. I'm merely pointing out that you have been had by the WaPo. The evidence of a Postal worker recant is fake news. Why would they do that?
Wait, the guy who is upset that his GoFundMe page worth some $130k is being held up because he recanted is now claiming that he didn't recant? Yeah, I totally believe him because he has absolutely no motive to lie now that he's about to lose his job.
Well, I guess it goes back to Skeptic Ginger claiming that the claims were "piddly" and only about insignificant numbers of votes. You guys seemed to be almost completely ignorant about what the claims actually are. Hence I thought maybe it would be worth letting you know what the claims actually are since clearly what ever sources of news you are relying on aren't telling you.Then why even bring it up?
Three unnamed people were told by some other unnamed people that the guy who says he didn't recant, recanted.... glad we are keeping to our standard of evidence.
Sure. But then I'm not coordinating any of the court cases, so that isn't particularly surprising.Translation: I have nothing.
Three unnamed people were told by some other unnamed people that the guy who says he didn't recant, recanted.... glad we are keeping to our standard of evidence.
Absentee Voter Fraud in New Jersey results in election do-over:
Apart from the evidence you are ignoring?
I would assume more evidence will be coming out over the next few days for you to also ignore.
As has been stated many, many times.... we have to see what happens with these cases.
Good point. You're just spreading bull **** on an Internet forum and pretending it's meaningful. The meanies here shouldn't make you back anything up. They should just post laughing dog GIFs then ignore you.Sure. But then I'm not coordinating any of the court cases, so that isn't particularly surprising.