• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Allegations of Fraud in 2020 US Election

Status
Not open for further replies.
Meadmaker said:
Well that would be a pretty big deal. Pity gatewaypundit didn't cite a source, but I'm sure we'll see it popping up elsewhere, if it's real, and on Twitter, if it's not.
Click to expand...

If you can’t trust the guys who still support Jacob Wohl, who can you trust?
 
BobTheCoward said:
I tried figuring out what they were thinking. Apparently it has to deal with fox news election website numbers reporting on election night.

This is like the 100,000 votes for Biden and zero for Trump thing. Why are people treating these sites like they are official?
Click to expand...

I suspected as much. In other words, six days ago, there was a software glitch that was detected and corrected.

And ST reports, via some twitter thingie, that Wisconsin has flipped to Trump.

I figured if there were any truth at all to that, it would take about 3 minutes to show up on CNN.

Another rumor bites the dust.
 
Meadmaker said:
I suspected as much. In other words, six days ago, there was a software glitch that was detected and corrected.

And ST reports, via some twitter thingie, that Wisconsin has flipped to Trump.

I figured if there were any truth at all to that, it would take about 3 minutes to show up on CNN.

Another rumor bites the dust.
Click to expand...

And to be clear....a glitch on a news site
 
I looked up Leigh Dundas, to return to this morning's discussion. She's the source of "statistically impossible voter turnout". She made a video after participating on a phone conference with the Trump team.


Or.....did she?

I looked her up. She seems crazy. I didn't see any reference to her being associated with Trump. I didn't look very hard, but I'm not sure she just wasn't making the whole thing up.
 
The "system glitch" report appears only to be on far right sources.

The official count for WI is still showing Biden with a lead of 20,500 at this time.


ETA: just updated to 20,539
 
Last edited:
No Other said:
Benford's Law does not indicate a fraudulent election any more than an x-ray indicates a fracture. Both processes provide you with information in order to go to the next level of evaluation. Predetermined criteria will be applied to the added knowledge for scrutiny.
Click to expand...

Maybe, maybe not. Physicians use xrays to find fractures. Can you identify election fraud with Benford's law? Sounds like people are just talking nonsense to me at this point.
 
Meadmaker said:
Well that would be a pretty big deal. Pity gatewaypundit didn't cite a source, but I'm sure we'll see it popping up elsewhere, if it's real, and on Twitter, if it's not.
Click to expand...

I looked that up. Gateway pundit claims that "When this one is confirmed" it will mean something. As in, it is not confirmed.

A quick skim of RealClearPolitics still shows Biden well ahead in Pennsylvania. The gallop goes on, Trump ought to pass out saddles for our resident Gish Jockeys.
 
acbytesla said:
The Heritage Foundation. Now that's a reliable source.:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
There are more than 50 cites which include Grand Jury Report, FBI, associated press, Chicago Tribune, etc. Are you able to give any justification for dismissal other than ad hom attacks?
 
No Other said:
Benford's Law does not indicate a fraudulent election any more than an x-ray indicates a fracture. Both processes provide you with information in order to go to the next level of evaluation. Predetermined criteria will be applied to the added knowledge for scrutiny.
Click to expand...

Your medical expertise is impressive, on a par with our current president. The vast majority of fractures are diagnosed by x-rays alone. Even fractures not definitively identified by x-ray (e.g., nondisplaced fractures) are often simply treated presumptively with splints/casts and rechecked on x-ray later. More advanced imaging is usually reserved for complex fractures with joint involvement or chronic indicators of fractures that aren't showing up on x-ray; the latter is uncommon for multiple reasons including cost and the desire to avoid large radiation doses (from CT) for questionable diagnostic utility.
 
slyjoe said:
See that word? That's the problem. As others have pointed at, they all fall apart (affidavits). Present the evidence if there is any.
Click to expand...
You don’t understand how these types of crimes work, are discovered, or the amount of effort and time it takes to investigate them. Read the article I posted about an actual historic example of wide scale voter fraud that took place in the 1982 Chicago election and was prosecuted. Rob Blagojevich (Disgraced Chicago politician caught trying to sell congressional seat in Chicago and served jail Time) recently shared that this type of activity occurred during his career in the mid-2000’s.

What is the harm in verifying the integrity of the 2020 election in a similar way that the FBI did in 1982?

For the 2016 election, Congress spent millions of dollars blindly knowing how it would turn out, hired special counsel, empowered the counsel with anything they need to complete the task and spent months investigating it. Why can’t the validity of this election be verified with a similar amount of commitment and ambition?
 
ServiceSoon said:
What is the harm in verifying the integrity of the 2020 election in a similar way that the FBI did in 1982?

For the 2016 election, Congress spent millions of dollars blindly knowing how it would turn out,
Click to expand...
And there's your answer.

You see, I know the real reason you want to spend millions in the vain hope of finding some way to reverse the result, and no amount of denial can change that fact.
 
Meadmaker said:
I suspected as much. In other words, six days ago, there was a software glitch that was detected and corrected.

And ST reports, via some twitter thingie, that Wisconsin has flipped to Trump.

I figured if there were any truth at all to that, it would take about 3 minutes to show up on CNN.

Another rumor bites the dust.
Click to expand...


So we've all seen the meme:

[imgw=640]https://i.imgur.com/pie7Tdk.jpg[/imgw]

That is supposed to be the voting count in time in Wisconsin. Allegedly some 138 thousand votes were added for BIDEN in the middle of the night while ZERO were added for Trump. The "debunking" of that is that it was a news reporting glitch? While Wisconsin has allegedly a close to 90% voter turnout? Twenty percent more than ever in history?
 
btw I can report that a German lawmaker whom I greatly respect (Andrej Hunko) was in the US as an election observer for the OSCE and he thinks everything was fine. But he was supposed to observe the election in North Carolina but wasn't let in. He then observed the election in Missouri (which to my knowledge is undisputed and irrelevant in the greater picture).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom