Bill Barr and his October Surprise

According to that interview, Giuliani is claiming there are at least 2 other laptops that used to be Hunter's out there, that are or were in the possession of known Russian asset Derkach:



So the known Russian asset magically has possession of multiple laptops that Hunter Biden lost or forgot somewhere, and he's shopping them around? And we're expected to believe this isn't Russian disinformation?

It seems that Hunter has a habit of dropping laptops off for repair, forgetting that he's done so, and buying a new one. And repair shop owners have a habit of searching through these laptops and then giving the contents to random people.
 
Bobulinski said in his Tucker Carlson interview tonight that the reason he came forward was because blabbermouth Adam Schiff said the emails with his name on them was Russian disinformation from the Kremlin. Bobulinski contacted Biden's people and said that if a retraction wasn't issued he was coming forward with all of his information.

Thanks for being a lying idiot, Adam.

Why would anyone trust Tucker when Fox says you can not trust Tucker?

U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil wrote: "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."

The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "
 
Was today the day the FBI confirmed all the cool research done at the beginning of this thread that showed the Biden's committed multiple felonies?

Or, are we sticking with "deep state" and "things take time" for the reasons that "obvious criminals" are not being arrested by an FBI run by their political foe right before an election?

Just trying to get my calendar all cleared up, just in case.

Maybe it will be today. I'm not taking a shower today because I don't want to miss the news of Biden being arrested from his basement bunker.
 
Geez, it's amusing how quickly you guys forget the stuff that falls apart in this story.

Here you go.


And no where in there did I say it was true or anything, I quoted Giuliani, and said don't shoot the messenger. I repeatedly posted what the claims were and said as much.

What's amusing is you can't tell the difference between me posting what someone else is claiming, and what my claims are or aren't.
 
Last edited:
Geez, it's amusing how quickly you guys forget the stuff that falls apart in this story.

Here you go.

"LOL I was just............ *dramatic pause*..... *longer dramatic pause* ASKING QUESTIONS!" is going to be the excuse, hence the "Don't shoot the messenger" out they put in their original post.

Again this is a smear job, everyone is going to suggest a lot but very few people are going to go on record as saying anything.

Argumentative and intellectual cowardness. If you're going to accuse someone of something, own it.
 
"LOL I was just............ *dramatic pause*..... *longer dramatic pause* ASKING QUESTIONS!" is going to be the excuse, hence the "Don't shoot the messenger" out they put in their original post.

Again this is a smear job, everyone is going to suggest a lot but very few people are going to go on record as saying anything.

Argumentative and intellectual cowardness. If you're going to accuse someone of something, own it.


Anyone who reads the post can see I was not "asking questions" I was posting what the claim was. Hence "Giuliani goes there" and "don't shoot the messenger."

I can't help it if you or anyone else has a comprehension problem, or are so desperate to smear people that you will insert words into other people's mouths.
 
Anyone who reads the post can see I was not "asking questions" I was posting what the claim was. Hence "Giuliani goes there" and "don't shoot the messenger."

I can't help it if you or anyone else has a comprehension problem, or are so desperate to smear people that you will insert words into other people's mouths.

I could play your game and ask you if you think Giuliani was lying, but that was certainly not the impression you gave when you "didn't 'make the claim' per se, just repeated the claim, defended the claim, and tried to mock anyone who disputed the claim."
 
So you're just repeating baseless lies instead of making them up yourself.

I posted the claim, you can characterize it however you want. It's quite clear in the post that it was in no way my claim or that I thought it was true. Even going so far as to say "don't shoot the messenger." And yet that's exactly what is happening. Which only goes to show how clearly dishonest you and others here are. The mere fact that someone would declare I made a claim and provide a link that proves I made NO such claim, yet he and others try to spin it only makes them look foolish.
 
"Oh noes they are on to my cunning plan of just repeating smears and playing innocent when called on it, better come up with a new tactic..."

Our choices are:

- Huffy mock anger.
- Fringe reset.
- Whataboutism
- Distraction
- The Wildcard
 
"Oh noes they are on to my cunning plan of just repeating smears and playing innocent when called on it, better come up with a new tactic..."

Our choices are:

- Huffy mock anger.
- Fringe reset.
- Whataboutism
- Distraction
- The Wildcard

You forgot All Of The Above.
 
I'm really disappointed. I expected that Giuliani could at least produce a photo of Joe and/or Hunter Biden wearing a tan suit.
 
I could play your game and ask you if you think Giuliani was lying, but that was certainly not the impression you gave when you "didn't 'make the claim' per se, just repeated the claim, defended the claim, and tried to mock anyone who disputed the claim."

Now link to me defending the claim that there is child porn on the laptop. Since your last claim has been debunked.
 
"Oh noes they are on to my cunning plan of just repeating smears and playing innocent when called on it, better come up with a new tactic..."

Our choices are:

- Huffy mock anger.
- Fringe reset.
- Whataboutism
- Distraction
- The Wildcard

You have a problem with someone posting the actual claims being made that are central to the discussion?
 
So you're just repeating baseless lies instead of making them up yourself.

To be fair, I don't even think Giuliani is making them up. It's not like he is talented enough to pull this kind of garbage out of his pants, no matter how deep the tuck.
 
When they even lost FOX: ‘Our Interview Is Now OVER’: Giuliani Erupts on Fox’s Kennedy Over Biden, Shouts at Her for ‘Outrageous Defamation’

The sequence starting at minute 7 is delicious.

https://www.mediaite.com/tv/our-int...iden-shouts-at-her-for-outrageous-defamation/

It really is strange with the current batch, they seem to only be able to accuse others of what they have or are doing and this video was a good example. Rudi’s comments about Steel himself were defamation.
 
You have a problem with someone posting the actual claims being made that are central to the discussion?

There's no discussion. There's you repeating someone else repeating some baseless lie and doing the whole "What? I'm not saying it..." routine when called on it. It's not just sad, it's cliche.

And survey says.... *DING* Distraction.
 
There's no discussion. There's you repeating someone else repeating some baseless lie and doing the whole "What? I'm not saying it..." routine when called on it. It's not just sad, it's cliched.

And survey says.... *DING* Distraction.

This is a pitiful attempt to distract that a poster here attributed a position to me that I obviously never made. There are pages and pages of a discussion about the claims regarding the laptop.
 

Back
Top Bottom